• Cyv_
    link
    fedilink
    1212 years ago

    Weird christian shame shit aside, here’s a nice security concern to top it off:

    “A US Congressman is allowing a 3rd Party tech company to scan ALL of his electronic devices daily and then uploading reports to his son about what he’s watching or not watching….,” Receipt Maven wrote. “I mean, who else is accessing that data?”

    • KptnAutismus
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      the 3rd party tech company maybe? or the people they sell the data off to?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      You’d think this obvious hole in cybersecurity would be a big deal to the “but her emails” types, if they had absolutely any moral consistency

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Huh? That’s so ridiculous it can’t possibly be true.

    Can we get another source?

    Edit: yeah. This is also reported by plenty of other sources.

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      272 years ago

      If you read the article, they link to a tweet where he discusses it at length on video.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      You probably already know this, but you need to keep a lookout for where the articles are actually sourced from. Just because multiple sources are reporting on something could simply mean they are affiliated outlets publishing the same story from the same original author.

      This saves time for affiliate outlets, but it’s a practice that is vulnerable to the rapid spread of misreporting or intentional misinformation.

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          No.

          You got blasted because you tried calling a local newspaper a non-credible source despite it being proven it was very credible.

          You just didn’t like that it was a left wing site and wanted to discredit it. You failed hard and you’re still moaning about it days later.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You’re getting blasted because you didn’t bother to read the “unbelievable story”, which contained a link to exactly what you asked for.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              During a conversation on the “War on Technology” at Benton, Louisiana’s Cypress Baptist Church — unearthed by X user Receipt Maven — the Louisiana representative talked about how he installed “accountability software” called Covenant Eyes on his devices in order to abstain from internet porn and other unsavory websites.

              Literally all you had to do was click the link.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    The real problem is people that should be our leaders don’t want anything to do with all the bullshit involved with politics. So we end up with weirdos and crazies instead.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Revealed: Mike Johnson watches more porn than the rest of the politicians combined, and apparently it’s a father-son activity.

  • zib
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    There’s a lot to unpack here and I’m not sure I want to.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1192 years ago

    Mike Johnson goes to the doctor for a checkup.

    Doctor says, “Mr. Speaker, you’ve got to stop masturbating.”

    Johnson says, “Why?”

    Doctor says, “So I can examine you.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    652 years ago

    If my parent asked me to monitor their porn intake I’d tell them to talk to a clinical sexologist because what the actual fuck‽ And if they asked about mine I’d honestly be concerned that there’s something incestous there.

    Like I’m super pro sex ed and parent-child communication on such things. But there are things that you’d like to keep private from that relationship unless it’s important. I’m so grateful I don’t know anything about my parents’ masturbation habits

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Yeah, the concept isn’t that much different than going to AA meetings, but having your minor son be your accountability partner is pretty weird.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Having your kid be your AA sponsor also sounds pretty dang irresponsible in most cases. But also compulsive porn consumption is something that’s less to be solved with “even more Christian AA” than it is with a clinical sexologist because there’s usually quite a bit going on there and many times it’s more related to being ashamed of having healthy sexual desires than it it is an addiction. But also it’s having your kid monitor your porn consumption. Not a friend. Not your spouse. Your child.

      • PeleSpirit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        That’s assuming that one or both have an addiction.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        It looks more like a control thing to me. He wanted to see his son’s porn habits and offered his own in return as an “olive branch”. And I wonder if both just use another device to consume porn without the other knowing.