Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to Privacy [email protected]English • 2 years ago

Google Resuming the transition to Manifest V3 - Chrome for Developers

developer.chrome.com

external-link
message-square
14
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
28
external-link

Google Resuming the transition to Manifest V3 - Chrome for Developers

developer.chrome.com

@[email protected] to Privacy [email protected]English • 2 years ago
message-square
14
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
Resuming the transition to Manifest V3 - Chrome for Developers
developer.chrome.com
external-link
Build the next generation of web experiences.

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/6008113

This will disable many popular extensions for example uBlock Orgin

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • moonwalker
    link
    fedilink
    2•2 years ago

    @ericjmorey and tha shitstorm continues

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2•2 years ago

      Firefox looking better for 2024

      • moonwalker
        link
        fedilink
        1•2 years ago

        @ericjmorey yup. at least they give a shit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4•2 years ago

    can someone refresh me on why exactly migrating to manifest v3 is bad?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8•2 years ago

      https://www.eff.org/am/deeplinks/2019/07/googles-plans-chrome-extensions-wont-really-help-security

      https://www.eff.org/am/deeplinks/2021/11/manifest-v3-open-web-politics-sheeps-clothing

      https://www.eff.org/am/deeplinks/2021/12/chrome-users-beware-manifest-v3-deceitful-and-threatening

      https://www.eff.org/am/deeplinks/2021/12/googles-manifest-v3-still-hurts-privacy-security-innovation

      Mozilla is implementing it differently https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2022/05/18/manifest-v3-in-firefox-recap-next-steps/

      They have published a guide https://extensionworkshop.com/documentation/develop/manifest-v3-migration-guide/

    • mephiska
      link
      fedilink
      2•2 years ago

      From what I’ve read it will disable ad-blocking extensions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1•2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • RandomLegend [He/Him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12•2 years ago

    can they please just like… don’t?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3•2 years ago

      Seems like something they can’t stop pushing because … reasons.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6•2 years ago

      That’s what happens in a quasi monopoly. They would suffer no consequences from it and the others like Mozilla would just have to follow along.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2•2 years ago

        Mozilla will want to be API-compatible, but there’s nothing inherent to the API that requires the arbitrary content-blocking limitation that Google put in. So, Mozilla will be API-compatible without adopting this shitty limitation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3•2 years ago

          Manifest V3 isn’t just an arbitrary limitation on numbers; it also includes limitations on allowing the lists to be downloaded dynamically, and on blocking elements on pages dynamically

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3•2 years ago

            Interesting, I didn’t know that, but it doesn’t really change anything about my comment. Mozilla can offer APIs in addition to what Manifest v3 offers, allowing extensions that want to do these things to do them. It’s already the case today, for example, that uBlock Origin makes use of additional APIs for more effective ad blocking on Firefox.

    • Vexz
      link
      fedilink
      4•2 years ago

      Why would they want to stop? This is their fight against adblockers and on Chromium based browsers it’s an effective way so of course they keep pushing. ;)

      • RandomLegend [He/Him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3•2 years ago

        I don’t want to hear the realistic argumentation of why this is proceeding. I want to live in my fantasy headspace where comments like this can stop superpower megacorps from being assholes…okay? 😅

Privacy [email protected]

[email protected]
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

  • Subscribe on Kbin.social
  • Subscribe on Lemmy.one
  • Subscribe on Lemmy.ml
  • Subscribe on Beehaw.org

Learn more…


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We’ve tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the “official” Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other “Privacy Guides” communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don’t ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don’t repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don’t abuse our community’s willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

  • EFF: Surveillance Self-Defense
  • Consumer Reports Security Planner
  • Jonah Aragon (YouTube)
  • r/Privacy
  • Big Ass Data Broker Opt-Out List
  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 4 users / month
  • 588 users / 6 months
  • 2 subscribers
  • 717 Posts
  • 10.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org