• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    691 year ago

    I THINK THIS HAS TO DO WITH APP PERMISSIONS. IF YOUR APP NEEDS A PLACE TO READ/WRITE FILES, IT MAKES SENSE TO KEEP IT OUT OF YOUR DOWNLOADS FOLDER THAT COULD CONTAIN SENSITIVE INFORMATION LIKE BANK STATEMENTS OR OTHER THINGS. YOU DON’T WANT SOME RANDOM APP LOOKING AT EVERYTHING THAT ENDS UP IN YOUR DOWNLOADS FOLDER!!!

    GET RILED ABOUT GIVING THESE GREEDY DATA SNOOPING APPS THE LEAST PERMISSION POSSIBLE!!

    • glibg10bOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      I understand the security implications, but I think I should at least have a say about what happens on my own phone

      The app in question is popular and open source. My SD card’s downloads folder is also unused and empty, as you can see. There is absolutely zero risk here

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      The mildly infuriating part of this post is OP thinking that his consumer phone OS was made just for them and not millions of tech-illiterate people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    571 year ago

    Sounds like you’re part of the group they’re protecting if you refuse to understand and value the need for permission management ;)

    Unlucky!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      You joke but those and helmet laws all should be repealed. We need to stop protecting people from Darwin. When the stupid assholes can’t cull themselves naturally it drives the average intelligence downward.

      We see the results of this in modern society with the number of iPhone owners. No one should want an iPhone but marketing is all it takes for the stupid to be convinced.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        …until you’re personally involved in a fatal accident—even if by no fault of your own—where the other party would have survived. Post traumatic stress is no joke. I don’t think we should aspire to have a society with more suffering.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Lol. Forcing people to do your bidding just ‘in case’ someone dies in your vicinity. What a tyrant.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            The argument I’ve made is that I don’t wish to personally suffer psychological damage because of somebody’s death. We don’t allow others to inflict harm in other ways, and this is in my opinion no different. It has nothing to do with tyranny.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, you’ve demanded other people restrict themselves so that you are spared the ‘chance’ of “personally suffer psychological damage because of somebody’s death”.

              Pretending your demands have no consequence on others isn’t a valid defense. It’s pure selfishness expressed as tyranny.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                What an absolutely absurd position you’ve chosen to take on this. I can only hope for the sake of compassion that this is not what you actually believe.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  "Forces others to do their bidding and draws on ‘compassion’ to justify it. "

                  Narcissism defined folks.

      • HeartyBeast
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        When the stupid assholes can’t cull themselves naturally it drives the average intelligence downward.

        And yet … here you are.

  • Keith
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Just curious, as a rooted phone user is there any way to force this to allow you to use downloads?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      How is downloads folder not important? For most people this is literally the biggest folder of files containing everything they ever downloaded, and it may also include downloads from messengers, e.g. Whatsapp and Telegram.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    941 year ago

    While it is annoying to people like you and me, this is a good thing for the average user. Your average downloads folder probably contains sensitive information that shouldn’t be visible to apps. Same with Android/data. Locking it down is annoying for sure, but it’s admittedly a good privacy&security measure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      If the average user was more occupied dealing with identity theft they’d have less time to spread misinformation on Facebook and Twitter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Exactly.

      I have often found malware apps with all sorts of permission on my relatives phones which suddenly started to lag alot. These folders can be easily exploited by malware apps, so its kinda good.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Even if it’s blocked for the average user, it’d still be awesome if we could circumvent it with adb. I’ve used KDE Connect to access my phone remotely for a long time, and now that feature is useless.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    would you still be insulted if it said “only folders can be created in the root directory”?

  • bjorney
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    This is so every app can only read it’s own subfolder. Unless you think it’s better that advertisers and app developers can have access to 100% of your personal files