• livus
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    That’s okay. Literally the only thing I use chrome for is gmail.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I’ve switched from reddit to Lemmy, from windows to Linux and just as easy as my devices are running Firefox. I was balls deep in Google, they keep on pushing me away

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Same here, man, same here. EndeavourOS + Firefox + Privacy Badger + uBlock origin + User agent switcher/manager + VPN is my favorite recipe so far.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    I wonder if there ever will be a point where the mayor populous actually goes “screw this” and starts finding out how to change their browser via “how to change internet” or “how to change google”

    will there ever be a point where this even happens i wonder, like at all

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      If you mean Manifest V3 (MV3) then yeah it’s been on the table for a while, they had to make additional APIs for other extension developers because of how restrictive it was to begin with. The question is how many APIs are they going to develop without inadvertently allowing more adblock extensions? It’s a tough problem for them it seems.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    On mobile I’m using DDG as primary browser. Firefox as secondary.

    On my personal machine it’s Firefox and Chromium.

    For my job I use Thorium as main (switched coming from Brave), Chrome, Firefox and Edge.

    Could do without Chrome any day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      On mobile I’m using DDG as primary browser.

      Don’t get me wrong, DDG’s app is a massive step up in privacy, but it’s hardly a browser, it’s simply a WebView frontend. You’re pretty much still using Chrome.

  • Cosmicomical
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    I limited google chrome a long time ago when i switched back to firefox for good

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Firefox’s decision to move to WebExtensions is starting to look even more questionable, IMO.

    • enkers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yeah, perhaps not their greatest move ever. I miss how customizable Firefox used to be. For a long time I used Waterfox Classic to postpone the switch, but it got harder and harder. Now you have to use stuff like paxmod to get back some of the old features.

      I don’t know the internal technical issues too well, though, and they have made a lot of headway in the speed department since switching. I do recall discussion around when they dropped them about being held back by the addon architecture.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        It definitely was their gratest move ever. So many improvements was blocked by supporting the old extensions. Firefox would be completely useless and dead by now if they was still supporting them. Their loss in market share to chrome is largely due to not killing them 5 years earlier.

        • enkers
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          OK, but even if I accept that there was a technical necessity, the new architecture needlessly blocked ui modification to offer a less flexible experience. They could have provided a solution that worked better for their most loyal users and long time advocates. Instead they caused the outflux of these highly technical users, many of whom instead championed chrome, and more or less got us into this mess in the first place.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            A lot of the Firefox users you mention have probably moved to Vivaldi, given that it has implemented features that Firefox had via extensions before they went all in on WebExtensions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        It was originally questionable because it completely hobbled extensions, and now Chrome is seeking to hobble the standard even more

    • snownyte
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Yeah and it’ll be very interesting as to what the Firefox fanboys will think then when that continues gaining traction.

      I’ll go back to what I said - all browsers are generally shit in one way or another. And they influence one and another. Very few browsers keep up the fight but browser hopping will be entirely meaningless when these people are out to redesign the web in their visage.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      This impacts all Chromium based browsers. Unless support is maintained separately by browser vendor, only other option is Firefox or any of its forks.

      This is kind of a time for Mozilla to shine, but I worry they will mess up and maybe even follow later.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I know you are being sarcastic, but it’s not sarcasm at all, and therefore no laughing matter, when more and more websites drop support for none-chromium browsers, or actively block them. Netizens tend to have some missguided belief that every problem can be solved with software alone. This is a trap.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 years ago

    I’d be very curious how they are going to try and fuck over Firefox, or similar browsers.

    It’s not “just business “, it’s personal. It’s all personal, Mike. You know who I learned that from? Your Father, the Godfather.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Google’s proposed “Web Integrity API” browser-DRM was probably the biggest attack on the open web since its conception. I don’t think they have fully given up on that idea and they’ll likely sneak it in more gradually and slowly. Manifest v3 is just a small baby step in this direction of taking away user control.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      The various websites will just say Firefox is “not supported”. I just wrote this in another comment, but Twitch doesn’t let you log in on FF because it has some kind of advanced tracking protection. I guess YouTube and the rest will just join the fuckery and block you from using their content if you’re on FF. I mean, I really hope they won’t do that, but knowing what degree of assholery these companies can pull off, I think it’s the next step.

      • ka-chow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I used to have that issue with Twitch and FF, the fix was to create a new Firefox profile :)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Presumably the FTC will have something to say about blatant anticompetitive actions such at these. Then again, that’s why corporations buy themselves representatives, senators and judges.

        Edit: such not suck

  • Lemmington Bunnie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    I’m only using Chrome for work because the profile switching & syncing is so much smoother and our company is split into two primary brands - my brain handles it better with an individual browser profile for each.

    We’re consolidating everything into one next year, meaning I can ditch the second browser!

    I’ve tried setting up a second profile but it was just too much effort to get it working and bring everything across from both, then do the same on my laptop for travel, so I’ll just wait for now.