The Yankee War Machine department expects me to believe this.
Their bombs arent deliberately targeting much of anything… Even though those bombs are extremely expensive and capable of centimeter precision targeting.
Got it, all those people in the refugee camps weren’t civilians.
I guess anything to justify mass murder…
All good then, you may resume. /S
God is dead still, they keep killing him for some reason. Sides don’t matter.
Might as well justify America’s mass shootings too. War is war.
Maybe not deliberately, but is bombing buildings not caring if kids are in them or not better?? Not journalists killing is what I would like to see them comment on.
Just like there no evidence police deliberately use excessive force. It’s just standard procedure, nothing personal.
Clearly those Palestinians being bombed should have just complied.
For the cases when the Hamas are hiding in the same buildings as civilians (effectively using them as a human shield), what does the esteemed audience suggest?
Take food and water to hand out to the people.
To the terrorists or what
You said …
Hamas are hiding in the same buildings as civilians (effectively using them as a human shield)
So handing out water and food wouldn’t just be to the few (if any) Hamas members hiding there.
It would be a great help to the innocent Palestinians who are caught in the IDF’s crosshairs.
Don’t kill the human shield? You don’t kill the hostages in a hostage situation. Well, if you’re not Israel, at least. They seem fine with killing Israeli hostages as well and just blaming the other party for killing them by them not moving them out of the way of IDF bombs.
Let’s say for the sake of argument that a terrorist cell popped up in your town. Would be okay for the government to carpet bomb your town, including your house, to remove them? If not, how is that different from the scenario in Gaza?
In this case the terrorist organisation is the de facto government and they just escalated an ongoing conflict into a war
I understand you’re furious as many others here, but what exactly is it you suggest doing in this case?
Almost anything else, including doing nothing, is better than indiscriminately murdering people.
How is this so hard for people to understand?
Don’t kill civilians.
It’s not hard unless you’ve lost your moral compass.
I am sorry, but this isn’t an answer to the question.
If is if you’d open your mind a tiny bit.
If bombing hostages isn’t an option, what else can you do?
If it’s a city full of terrorists what do you do?
It’s a city that’s >95% civilians, 50% children.
You don’t blindly kill them is what you do.
I am sorry for the people there. But none of you defenders of Hamas suggest anything that is a fair price for what the Hamas did in Israel.
Defending Palestinians is not defending Hamas you sick fuck.
Don’t kill civilians.
How is this hard for you?
Whatever. You don’t understand the question and your attempt to force me in a box of your thinking is not working.
I am sorry for the loss. But civilians will die as in any war.
I understand all your lot comments about land. But nothing justifies what has been done by Hamas.
It is them who you must blame for the consequences. The consequences is what you get when you lend your ears to those whose agenda you don’t want to understand.
I am sorry for you guys. You put Israel and Russia on the same level. I am sorry for your blindsight.
You are choosing not to understand that the existence of terrorism is not a free pass to kill civilians.
“Civilians will die” is you approving of attacks on civilians. They wouldn’t die if Israel didn’t bomb them.
I thought you said the terrorists were using civilians as human shields, now they’re all terrorists?
Make up your mind, jeez.
If you truly believe this, you’ve fallen for the brainwashing by your gov’t/media.
Why don’t just come out and say what you want? Just say you want all Palestinians dead, coward.
It isn’t. Do not try to suggest otherwise.
It is, you just don’t like it
I would be banned if I said what I think members of the IDF should do.
It seems more like a wanton disregard for civilian casualties. Blowing up entire apartment towers because they believe one or more people there were valid targets is unacceptable but not technically targeting civilians.
For sake of argument, suppose they earnestly believe this. I can think of a scenario consistent with that belief: that they also believe there are no civilians in the region, and that everyone present is Hamas.
Then all you need to tie a psychopathic bow on that is to say that anyone that doesn’t openly denounce Hamas is part of Hamas.
Easy peasy lemon squeezy
Checkout because these kids didn’t condem Hamas.
Is there any evidence they are making any effort to avoid or reduce civilian deaths?
Yes, the leaflets that warn civilians which areas will be bombed
It’s evidence that they’re trying to create the appearance of avoiding civilian casualties.
Hamas was just the bodies that fell along the way.
I’ve seen video of civvies in Gaza trying to take cover away from open space and being shot right through the knee. It’s been circulating since what I think in real time would be 2 nights ago. State department has been captured by the IDF.
And we’re going to belive the fucking state department? Yeah right.
Bombing promised safe routes and locations is totally not targeting civilians. Just ignore the mountain of bodies. Even if Hamas was sneaking out of them, you promised they’d be safe. The civilians had no other choice.
You’re going to have to take my word for it because I’m lazy and in bed, but Israel goes to serious effort to make no distinction between civilian, terrorist, protester or child.
They have rules of engagement so broad that basically nobody is safe. When soldiers gunned down children, they are either not charged or cleared by falsified evidence. Some of which admits that they killing was unjustified and offers alternative explanations to be given to the press.
