As asked

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Have all Meta, Microsoft, Amazon and Google servers go up in smoke and watch the world realize how much we depend on these four fuckwits

  • Pons_Aelius
    link
    fedilink
    122 years ago

    That humans are actually the rational beings many claim themselves to be, rather than animals that makes decisions based on emotion and then rationalise why they made the decision.

    I feel it would solve all the problems other commenters have mentioned.

      • Pons_Aelius
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Pretty much.

        The co2 we are emitting into the atmosphere is leading to problems.

        Rational response: reduce our co2 emissions as fast as possible.

        Our constant population expansion and habitat destruction is causing a new mass extension event:

        Rational response: Limit population growth. reduce environmental impact and regenerate damage already done.

        Etc

        etc

        etc.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          While I agree there are some problems that would be best solved through rational thinking, I wouldn’t want to live in a purely “rational” world. The entirety of the human experience lies between the gaps of rationality.

          • osarusan
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            That’s a popular trope that is spouted by anti-rationalists all the time, but it’s a total red herring. It’s one of those rhetorical tactics that is designed to disrupt judgment and put a stop to a conversation before the absurdity of the claim is made obvious. It’s drilled into us as children through tv, movies, even books, but it’s entirely false.

            Rationalism has plenty of room for fantasy, emotion, and everything else that humans experience. It’s not a choice between being rational and being a fully developed human. The choice is between being rational and being irrational. Everything else is its own separate thing.

          • MxM111
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            Wanting to feel love and happiness is quite rational too. Irrational feelings are not “anti- rational” they are just orthogonal, like color to taste. But making decisions based pure on feelings IS anti-rational.

  • ThatOneKirbyMain2568
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    I’d change a single bag of Cape Cod party-sized sea salt potato chips so that it would be at my current location.

  • livus
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Probanly erradicate akrasia. A lot of the world’s problems are down to rampant akrasia on the part of most people.

      • livus
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Any time! I find being able to put a name to it makes it slightly easier to call ourself out for doing it.

    • Johnvanjim
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Akrasia - A lack of self-control or acting against one’s better judgment.

    • guyrocketOP
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Would that be stopping global warming or all the extinctions?

      • Nepenthe
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Ideally, global warming, but it would be fair to view that as pointless when dissipating the extra CO2 doesn’t necessarily return the trees and the problem would degrade again in a couple hundred years. You’d have to introduce a new fuel source that is sought after, clean, and eternal. Which would be two wishes.

        So you have to define it as both of your options, since the loss of either worsens the other. Turn the whole environment back to where it was in the 1200s, overrun the streets with bears, see if I care. It’ll give 'em something to do. Especially the Amazonian avocado farmers.

  • Ganondorf
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I’d crank all human empathy levels by 15/100 points to see what happens