• 👁️👄👁️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    At this rate, I can see a billionaire stepping on a lego and saying legos need to be regulated.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Only the gooberment can protect us from rich people getting killed private subs. Plz take more of my tax dollars.

  • jkmooney
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    In the aviation world, an experimental aircraft may not be used for “compensation or hire”. The only exception is that a kitplane manufacturer is allowed to give demo flights.

      • jkmooney
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        United States Federal Aviation Administration, I believe EASA is similar.

          • jkmooney
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Those are the two I’m most familiar with in my profession, at least as far as civilian authorities are concerned. Can’t really say “no” and, I’m pretty sure neither can you. On the other hand, feel free to prove me wrong with a counter example. :)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Difficult to prove a negative, but I would be surprised if there aren’t at least a few third world countries with lax aviation rules.

              The point, though, is that strong regulations in the countries that are inclined to regulate these things aren’t actually going to stop persistent rich idiots from doing stupid things. The Titan was against regulations in every country that bothers to regulate submersibles, which is why it only operated in international waters. More regulations won’t change that, there’s still nobody to enforce them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    402 years ago

    I am calling for less. No billionaire should be stopped from going on an unregulated submarine.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    342 years ago

    To be clear, it wasn’t a “tourist sub”… so maybe the first regulation should be defining exactly what that is,

    • jkmooney
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      The CEO was very careful to skirt applicable regulatory laws. He even called his passengers “crew members”. In the aviation world, I have some experience harmonizing multiple regulatory authorities. Because of “international waters”, there will need to be some agreement and harmonizing of regulations. There’s already SOLAS so, I think it can be done.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        The regulations come from the countries that the company is founded in. OceanGate is (was) as US based company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        A “crew member” would be some kind of employee.

        Employees don’t pay a company a quarter of a million dollars to do “work” for eight hours. You don’t pay to work, you get payed to work.

        Just because you call someone a crew member doesn’t necessarily mean that would hold up in a court of law.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Technically I believe they were classified as employees that “donated” to the company. Nice workaround Stockton! Let’s see how that holds up in court with the obvious gross negligence.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Absolutely.

        The issue is that the regulations that do exist allow them to skirt it by not offering a hard, and broad, definitions of ‘tourist subs’.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    “And, by the way, watch Avatar: The Way of the Water today on Disney+!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      James Cameron actually has a lot of experience in submarine exploration, if any celebrity should be weighing in on this it’s him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    252 years ago

    I mean ok

    But also has an air of “won’t someone please think of the billionaires”

    Like, if some dipshit builds rockets and is offering trips to space for a million dollars and you tried to go to space through this clown and idk, not NASA… that’s kinda on you.

    But yeah, sure. Preventable deaths, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I take the radical perspective that people dying horrible pointless deaths is a bad thing and should be prevented. Yes, even stupid rich people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Who says this couldn’t eventually become a mass produced product though? I 100% believe it should be regulated, even if I could care less for some of the people that were on board. It still should be maintained so people don’t get sucked into unregulated BS, regardless of who gets on board.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      There for sure should be something to regulate the commercial aspect of it, I don’t give a goddamn if some billionaires want to build their own sub, go exploring and die themselves.

      But you shouldn’t be able to charge someone or pay someone else to go with/for you unless certain minimum safety standards are met. And you know that’s what these rich asshole will do if given the opportunity

  • Iapar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Interesting. What has ja rule say to this?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    Didn’t they ignore a bunch of regulatory bodies by claiming the passengers were experts and not tourists? I think throwing more laws at it won;t do much, unless they close similar loopholes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      372 years ago

      Mission Specialists.

      They were given trivial tasks to perform to justify the title. It was in bad faith and should have rung alarm bells. But I anticipate for the luxury thrill-seeker, they may be accustomed to fancy titles for their trips, and didn’t even really think about it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        The CEO bragged about building the submarine out of used parts and said that regulations were boring. He sealed his fate long before it happened.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      There are plenty of mutually agreed upon international regulations that ships, aircraft, etc. all abide by. It’s not rocket science (well there’s that too).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The port from which they launch and the country where the company is registered.

      If it’s all done incognito and they fuck up then too bad.

    • jkmooney
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      I work in aviation regulatory law but, a friend of mine does work in this arena. I did ask him if my analog existed in the nautical world and he was able to walk me through how he’d managed to avoid any regulatory oversight. There’s SOLAS but, other than that, it’s a gap that apparently needs to be closed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I’m not a lawyer, but it seems like the subs only operate in international waters. The ships carrying these deep sea submersibles dock at ports, but the subs themselves are cargo until you get out into the middle of nowhere.