• Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    93
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “Citing fire hazard, Disney bans Tesla vehicles from their properties, worldwide.” would be a hilarious headline.

    • SeedyOne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      You’re just the right kind of evil, that’s amazing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      452 years ago

      That would at least have some data to back it up. This is just a man-child throwing a hissy fit because the free market decided it didn’t want to do business with Twitter.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I mean, Disney is run by adults, so I suspect they’re sitting over there watching Elon punch himself in the balls and laughing about it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2122 years ago

    Imagine buying a $50k car and they take away features because the CEO is having a temper tantrum and wants everyone else to suffer.

    You’d have to be a fool to give this guy your money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      472 years ago

      You’d have to be a fool to give this guy your money.

      A fool and his money are easily parted.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      If only it was just money.

      There are people joining waiting lists to let Musk put microchips in their brains.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1832 years ago

    Since Twitter has nothing to do with Tesla (beyond the emotionally stunted owner) this is serious line being crossed. I mean - I don’t care about Tesla. But I do care about SpaceX and Starlink as they have serious geopolitical implications.

    Some country’s leader disses Twitter and they don’t get to launch satellites. Or their people don’t get satellite internet.

    This amount of power should not be in the hands of one rich guy with an inferiority complex.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      SpaceX and starlink are dead in the water and utterly useless until Musk has them taken away. As long as he’s running those, they’re just shitty companies with lots of empty promises

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Don’t know why you’re down voted. They’ve been promising man on mars any day now for years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          The mars thing is really a small part of what they do, although it gets the press. They are pretty much the only real game in town for satellite launches, and, I think ISS transport (especially since Soyez is Russian and there’s not a lot of good will going on there…). Even Amazon uses them for launches. It’s approaching monopoly status for critical infrastructure (we’re very dependant on satellites as a society now).

          Mars is a labour of love for future ambition, but it’s not the main show.

          Whether the root cause is historically poor NASA funding or not (I think there’s a strong argument for competition and private sector IF it’s properly governed, but it never is…), the fact is that we’ve created a situation where vast amounts of geopolitical control rest with a single person.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 years ago

          Because Republicans gutted NASA for decades. They absolutely loathed that it was a generally beloved program by everyone. And for every dollar of funding saw multiple times that in the value it created. What SpaceX did wasn’t something that NASA had never thought of. They just never had the funding to really pursue it. And especially in the wasteful manner Elon musk has.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            What did spaceX do, exactly?

            We’ve had re-usable spacecraft rated for human passengers since the Space Shuttle.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              Reentry vehicle sure. Launch vehicle, no. The ocean floor is littered with booster stage debris. NASA had experimented with a lot of different methods to reach orbit. And had even looked at things that SpaceX eventually built. But never had the funding to build themselves.

              SpaceX is nothing but the culmination of a Reagan era fascist fever, dream. Ofdismantling good governance. Privatizing everything possible and then price gouging.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I just saw SpaceX’s most recent rocket launch and it looked like they detached the boosters.

                I think they exploded afterwards, too.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Absolutely. But that’s only because Elon musk doesn’t mind throwing away money. He’s got so much of it. The rockets were supposed to stabilize themselves and land to be reused. He’s blown up more rockets than NASA so far. In much less time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 years ago

        I wouldn’t say they’re quite dead in the water but he definitely has plenty of power to enshitify them.

        He already shut off the Ukraine from starlink when he felt like it.

        Tit for tat Disney and Tesla.

        If he fucks with SpaceX though, NASA can just stop dealing with them. They would go real quick from being profitable to begging for people to use their service.

        If he starts getting a lot of back pressure from the EU and US on what he can launch, I can put a serious dent in his wallet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          “when he felt like it” isn’t exactly correct, he specifically didn’t allow them to use starlink to launch attacks on Russia, as it was meant to be used only for defense.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            The problem is, none of us have real knowledge about what happened there. All we have is conjecture and/or propaganda.

            It’s equally reasonably possible that he has ties in Russia.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            I mean, if you’re being invaded, doesn’t anything you do to fight back count as “defense”?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Not necessarily SpaceX but they needed something.

            The problem with NASA is that the funding waxes and wains with the administrations, as does the demands of the administrations to give them the money.

            If something takes more than 8 years to happen chances are the project never comes to fruition. NASA has really slowed down in development in recent decades.

            Not all the innovation SpaceX is doing is really warranted, though most of it’s kind of cool. But they are investing in research and development in places that NASA simply can’t get to.

            Starlink is just a way for spacex to capitalize on that research and development. They are their own sister company customer.

            That said they can all turn into dog shit in a matter of months if somebody got a stick up their butt

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1682 years ago

    10 years ago if someone had told me that in the future the tantrums of a billionaire petulant manchild would decide what features are available in your already paid for car I wouldn’t have believed them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      I wouldn’t have not believed it, but I would be bummed to learn that we still haven’t made contact with three-tiddied aliens.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The darkest timeline would be we have made contact with three-tiddied aliens but they were only interested in contacting high ranking officials in shadowy, sketchy U.S. government agencies like the CIA and military. That is what a lot of conspiracy minded people would have me believe and honestly if that was true those would be some lame af aliens. Like… all of all the people on earth to establish first contact with, you chose those losers?

          When they said you couldn’t make contact with the rest of humanity you were just like yup seems like these dipshits have the authority to decide that for the rest of humanity?

          Those would be some lame aliens and THAT would be the darkest timeline.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      512 years ago

      On the other hand, 10 years ago there’s almost no chance you would think that the Disnet Chanel would be a feature in an automobile.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        Tablets, Netflix, offline video files, and mobile internet all existed 10 years ago.

        The only thing that has changed is the level of control you have over the screen and where the content is coming from.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Features of whatever external devices you bring to your car, is not a feature of the car.

          AFAIK, only Tesla has native video streaming from the interface screen in the car, so most cars still don’t have this functionality.

  • billwashere
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Why would you have a streaming service playing on a screen very visible to the driver?!?! No wonder Tesla has such a high accident rate.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I’ll tell you that it’s super nice to be able to watch things with other people in the car while you are all waiting on the car to charge.

              Also, you don’t have to hold a phone and the screen is better.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    512 years ago

    What a pathetic gesture. I’ll show them, I’ll take away features from my cars! No one subs to Disney+ just because they can watch it in their car. All you’re doing is pissing off tesla owners and scaring away potential owners with your little bitch fit. Pathetic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Gotta love having a subscription for your car to give you a worse service than before because a man child bought a social media site.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    I think I will put in a support ticket about it just for the hell of it. They have time for petty shit like this but still haven’t fixed the automatic wipers that have been broken since August. Automatic wipers are actually a necessity in this car because the only way to operate them manually is with a few clicks on the touchscreen. It’s dangerous. They kept closing my support requests for it until I gave them the number for the NHTSA complaint I filed. I’m so sick of this turd and his shitty companies.

  • rynzcycle
    link
    fedilink
    552 years ago

    CEO of public company actively makes product worse because of business dealings at a seperate private company owned by said CEO. Not that Tesla shareholders don’t already have enough reason to be pissed, but good lord.

    And it’s not a “feud” that would imply Disney is being petty instead of making the fucking obvious business decision to pull advertising spend from the dumpster fire of racism and controversy that is Twitter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      instead of making the fucking obvious business decision to pull advertising spend from the dumpster fire of racism and controversy that is Twitter.

      Maybe it’s just me, but choosing where you advertise has always seemed like bullshit with no real evidence to back it up.

      Do people really believe that Disney will lose customers if they show ads on xvideos? How do you even explain that to your children, who won’t see the ads there in the first place?

      I can see a small media backlash that revives itself every so often, but that’s all. Frozen 3 gets announced and all of a sudden nobody cares.