Similar to the recent question about artists where you can successfully separate them from their art. Are there any artists who did something so horrible, so despicable, that it has instantly invalidated all art that they have had any part in?

  • Hyperreality
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not as if I’m a fan, but Eric Gill is/was a prolific, respected and internationally renowned artist. You’ll his work across the UK, perhaps most notably on the BBC’s broadcasting house.

    Also designed the Gill Sans typeface, which I think everyone’s heard of or even used. Used all across the world on signage or stores.

    Here’s why I have a hard time taking his works at face value:

    Although the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography describes Gill as “the greatest artist-craftsman of the twentieth century: a letter-cutter and type designer of genius”, he is also a figure of considerable controversy following the revelations of his sexual abuse of two of his daughters and of his pet dog.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Gill

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Well, one’s alive and the other isn’t. As long as the inheritors of MJ’s estate are decent people, I think it’s fine at this point. Still skeeves me out to listen to his stuff, though. Two verses in and my brain is popping.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        As far as I’m aware none of MJs accusers still say he did anything, and nearly all of them say their parents pressured them to say stuff he didn’t do for a settlement. He was definitely a weird guy but you look at his upbringing and it was trauma after trauma by adults exploiting him for money.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            If there is one accusation still active, sure. But every single case I’ve heard of, the family withdrew and admitted they were looking for a cash settlement.

      • Dr. Bob
        link
        fedilink
        English
        331 year ago

        You know that while he was incredibly strange, there were never any credible accusations right? There were a lot of people fluffing the stories trying to get a payout but there was never any evidence of wrongdoing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Well to be fair one was found guilty in a court of law and the other (I don’t believe but feel free to correct me) didn’t even have a criminal case brought against him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Loved Michael Jackson music so fucking much. Can’t stomach it anymore.

      But the first few moments of Billy Jean…

  • moosetwin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    581 year ago

    whenever I see a meme with art from stonetoss (a neo-nazi) in it, I have a visceral response

  • PendulumOP
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    Ian Watkins, lead singer of the band Lostprophets. Never read the court transcripts of his crimes, they really are that horrible and will ruin you for some time.

      • M137
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Really? It’s been widely covered for years now. He’s an absolute piece of shit.

      • JJROKCZ
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Not OP but, Alleged sexual assault, think the cases are still ongoing or he paid them to nda, didn’t follow it much. Man was always creepy so when the allegations came out I kinda thought “no surprise there” and didn’t pay much more attention

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Generally all of them. Every time I consider this question about an artist, I try and consider if I was the victim in the crime. Would I be okay hearing, seeing, or listening to this any longer? If the answer is no, then it’s no for me.

    I want to live empathetically and have to put my money where my mouth is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      471 year ago

      I honestly believe that if you’re convicted of shit like this the band should be able to sue to have your rights to royalties and any songwriting/producing credits revoked. Even if they have to surrender any monetary outcome to the victims or their families.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I know I loved the band growing up and the band have tried to separate themselves from the singer, but how can you? The music is still good but it can’t avoid leaving a bad feeling knowing he used the fame generated by the shared music for such heinous thing

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          It would make it a bit easier for people who can if you knew that the scumbag wasnt getting royalty cheques anymore.

          Ian Watkins is a fucking extreme example, but imagine putting in a dozen years of your life and career, your art and passion into a band and its catalogue only for the lead singer to make it absolutely radioactive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Hmm not a lawyer but I wonder if there might be some old law about this. Kinda feel like there is one since it’s retroactive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I’m convinced he’s not all there. Dude was talking about what he’s going to do when he gets out of prison. He doesn’t seem to understand they’re going to wheel him out on a trolley.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          The point is that we should try to stop using euphemistic language around rape. It happens all the time, and it lessens the impact of the act for the reader. We should be explicit.

        • DessertStorms
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You mean the distinction between engaging in consensual intercourse (aka “fucking”) vs committing a heinous crime?

          If you think pointing out that babies can only be raped, is the problem, not saying he “fucked” them, this is a you problem…

            • DessertStorms
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m making the point that babies cannot be fucked, only raped, which obviously isn’t “inherent” to the person who said “he fucked babies” which minimises the reality of the “scenario” as you call it (more minimisation, why do you do that? To preserve your own comfort of course!). Words matter, and if you think pointing that out is “splitting hairs” (when you’re literally the only one making a load of fuss over this valid distinction), then again, you’re the one with the problem here (and taking issue with someone pointed out that babies can only be raped, not “fucked” is definitely a problem that needs addressing, like seriously - imagine being the person dying on the hill to defend the use of “fucked” to describe baby rape… 🤦‍♀️).

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Lemmy sucks. This isn’t a you thing. Nobody IRL would ever spend the energy debating you on this. And of course a follow-up of “whoa relax don’t get triggered bro”

                There is no understanding that words matter round these parts at all. This place is a dangerous bubble bc it started as a place where one assumed everyone was on the level. So if you were the outlier opinion, maybe it really was you: I’d challenge myself and question my opinions. Now, if I’m downvoted, I dig in and entrench.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Bono. U2 is pretty mediocre to begin with, but with that asshole in front singing Id rather listen to Miley Cyrus.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I like both Bono and Miley. I actually like both music and their personalities at least the projected personalities. I don’t feel like they are trying to hide anything and they seem to want the world good

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Eh, I used to think like that, there was a time when it was popular to hate on U2. But really there are a lot of legitimate assholes out there who are actively making the world a worse place. His philanthropy is aggressive and attention seeking but the receipts are there and I’d much rather have someone channel all this energy and platform into pro-human rights than anti which is becoming increasingly popular these days.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I like U2, but obviously people have different opinions. However, when some dude worth 3/4 billion (no idea what the rest of the members are worth) asks an audience full of people who just paid an absurd ticket price propping up his hundreds of millions to wave their cellphone lights in the air and tells them how rich they are and how they give more money to whatever causes it really is tone deaf. I’m all for supporting a good cause, but that’s just stupid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      I’d almost say it’s the opposite… U2 is a decent band, but nothing too special. Bono has a strong reputation as a philanthropist doing good for the worlds charities.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        U2 sucks. I said it. Singer of my band in HS tried so hard to turn me… at least 3 mix tapes and I def found some less popular songs I liked. But I’m just not a fan. I change the station after a dramatic sigh when they come on. They don’t rock. I like that Batman twist me bang me something me song. Desire is fun. Sunday Bloody Sunday is emotionally tied to historical events, can’t sleep on it. Mysterious Ways is amazing and brings back positive feelings from those days (was it in a mixtape infomercial?). But besides the several songs I like, they suck… Shit… did I just talk myself out of hating them? Was I just an angsty little shit and South Park nailed the coffin?

  • Extras
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Im a firm believer you can like the art and not the artist but if i had to pick it would be the wizard of oz. Honestly what the director did to the actors/actresses on wizard of oz really zaps the magic out of the movie for me.

    • BruceTwarzen
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I never found anything he did appealing enough to even try to separate the art from the artist. He was always a dipshit. He used to call comedians like eddie murphy and told them that their act would shine a really bad light on black people.

  • gzrrt
    link
    fedilink
    951 year ago

    Kanye West. Maybe he was never ‘all there’ mentally to begin with, but the guy was clearly a role model to a lot of young people and utterly destroyed his own legacy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        His mom dying on the table during an implant surgery was 100% the catalyst that thrust him towards what he is today. Totally unexpected, and she wasn’t anywhere near the age that her death would have been a thought.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I am just thinking about something my wife told me, she is a nurse in cardiac unit mostly. She told me the ones that are the most devastating to the families is when there is nothing wrong until there is. Grandma was fine yesterday, she is not fine today.

    • Monz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Yep, I was a young person that loved Kanye back in high school when Graduation was the CD I had on me all the time.

      Can’t listen to it anymore. It’s ruined. :{