• MolochAlter
    link
    fedilink
    371 year ago

    Post scarcity societies can’t be approached in any meaningful way with modern economic theories.

    Star Trek is neither socialist nor capitalist, as both are systems designed to manage and portion out scarcity, and are based on economic theories that lack any predictive abilities in systems that don’t work in a context of scarce resources that need administration.

    Neither the labour theory of value nor marginal utility theory make any sense when all resources are trivial to obtain for individuals and whatever resources your community uses can be reused virtually endlessly within the limits of entropy.

    • jackeryjoo
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      While that may be true about Star Trek after the fact, the truth is that in order to get the federation off the ground, and the world economy in line to create the first Enterprise and crew and all the scientific advancements they made, required the entire world moving to a purely socialistic platform/agenda to achieve.

      • Norah (pup/it/she)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I don’t think you can discount first contact’s affect on that shift. Finding out you’re not alone in the universe would surely have a massive societal impact.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are we really dealing with “scarcity” at this point?

      Supermarkets throw away literal millions of tonnes of food annually. “Reduce, reuse, recycle” has become a hollow mantra that cannot be truly adopted by the profit driven design philosophies of consumer products. Sustainability is being treated like some chic perk rather than a critical topic that must be taken seriously if we want any hope for our futures.

      All these things are profoundly capitalist problems. Of course, it’s not like marxist-leninist ‘experiments’ fared any better, devolving into their own variants of capitalism, but there are many other socialist ideologies to consider (such as anarchism…)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        We are, because people want luxury goods too. Post-scarcity is about being able to produce most goods with barely any human labor (would absolutely be true for food if every person on earth only worked in food production or to produce machinery needed for it), which we aren’t even close to. AI and automation might get us there (though it’s questionable when the cycle of just investing the newfound labor capacity into more luxuries will stop, if ever), but people are actively resisting that (reasonably so) because the current economic system basically everywhere is horribly rigged towards funnelling the excess wealth to rich individuals rather than improving the living standards of society as a whole.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Idk, I’d say we want quality goods, and are lead to believe that these desires can be fulfilled by the lofty luxury goods market which is founded more on artificial scarcity than material scarcity. Even when rare materials and expensive labour are involved the fact that this simply makes them “more valuable” seems more important than any actual need, or lack of alternatives. Meanwhile, affordable products get enshittified, shorter lifespans, etc.

          though it’s questionable when the cycle of just investing the newfound labor capacity into more luxuries will stop, if ever

          Which is precisely why “post-scarcity” can only be reached with actual societal change, not just technological advancement.

  • Rodneyck
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    The oligarchs and billionaires who own the corporate mainstream media and both political parties are the ones stirring up WOKE issues. Why? So you all hate each other and take your eye off the billionaire thieves stealing everything. This is why we can’t have nice things.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I think it was more of a ‘this is a great opportunity for metaphoric storytelling’ than ‘let’s celebrate the Bush Doctrine’ though.

          I think it failed, but that’s another issue.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I got a lot of “we’re facing an exitensial threat, therefore the ends justify the means” out of the 3rd season. It seemed really out of place in a star trek show. Maybe it wasn’t an implicit endorsement of the Bush doctrine but it sure smelled like one to me.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              It’s been so long that I’d have to watch it again, to be honest. To me, the only good season of Enterprise was Season 4 when Manny Coto took over and just made it a season-long tribute to TOS. Ironically, Coto is a Republican. That said, he also made another terrific short-lived sci-fi TV show called Odyssey 5 with Peter Weller. I highly recommend its one season despite the cliffhanger ending.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  No problem. It was part of Showtime’s sci-fi block which also had a pretty good post-apocalyptic show called Jeremiah, which showed that Malcolm Jamal-Warner had range beyond sitcoms. Showtime axed all of their sci-fi shows and it died. Stargate SG-1 was the only one that got saved by moving over to the Sci-Fi Channel, I think because it was being co-funded by Canada.

                  I wish he’d continued to story in a book or something. Everyone I’ve recommended it to has liked it. Looks like all of the episodes are on YouTube. Here’s the pilot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWGbfQOFN60

    • rumschlumpel
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      11 year ago

      Recently watched a couple of episodes and it definitely felt old-fashioned in a way that didn’t feel appropriate for show about an utopian society from the early 2000s. At least the original series was progressive for the 1960s, which doesn’t necessarily feel “woke” from a 2020s rightwinger perspective.

      Or republicans just root for the enemies, that’s always a possibility.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      🤣 My dad and I say this to each other whenever one of us is gullible. I never see anyone quote it out in the wild.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Star Wars is literally space conservatives rebelling against the galactic communist (1970s US propagandized version of invented communism-fascist aesthetic*) empire…

    Firefly is to an even greater degree, like libertarian Browncoats rebelling. I love the fan fic take that the Alliance were the “good guys.”

    • katy ✨OP
      link
      fedilink
      721 year ago

      ok but the empire were literally fascists trying to rule the imperial senate with absolute authority…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        30
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s not actual communism but more like a reflection of the fears of communism in pop culture from the time when it was written in the late 70s. Comment was a bit inprecise but amended.

        • NoSpiritAnimal
          link
          fedilink
          111 year ago

          Why are you spreading this around like it’s true? Also, this is you:

          Very interesting! I knew the Vietnam thing but I’m not into Star Wars.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            1. George Lucas mentions Vietnam as an influence

            2. Fascism is clearly represented as well

            3. Star Wars is not a politically consistent universe or critique

            4. It’s a typical story arc where the antagonist is an amalgamation of things that were considered bad at the time

            5. It’s Star Wars so I ultimately don’t care that much

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          241 year ago

          Even the empire’s uniforms were pretty obviously based on nazi uniforms, what makes you think the empire is supposed to represent communism?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            It’s just based on what other’s have said about the Vietnam allegory but it’s also whatever, I’m sure Lucas’ wasn’t thinking of it as a primarily political mission to produce Star Wars, since it’s very much a standard plot with your usual archetype characters and roles.

            There’s a similar fan take on Lord of the Rings too which is interesting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      39
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      George Lucas has said that it was the Vietnam War that inspired the conflict in Star Wars, with the Empire representing the US, but also the rebels could represent the US against the British Empire from the Revolutionary War.

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Empire was in no way representative of Communism, it’s a fascist Empire with literal “Stormtroopers.” Lucas has shown more antifascist sentiment, and no anti-socialist sentiment. Lucas said the Empire represents the US, and the rebels the Viet Cong, in inspiration.

      One time, he even said despite the censorship in the USSR, he felt that move directors and writers were more free to make what they wanted without the profit motive getting in the way, specifically citing artistic freedom being higher (in his words).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      311 year ago

      Money exists in Star Trek, the Federation just doesn’t use it. the Ferengi love the stuff though

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        They occasionally reference “Federation Credits”, but I think it’s mainly for use outside the Federation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          This is just a world building issue that comes with hundreds of writers over the decades. Who knows how money works. Someone will say something, then ten years later, another writer wont get the note and write something that conflicts.

        • SharkAttak
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          That’s the greatest accomplishment of the Federation, tricking the Ferengi! Internally money isn’t used anymore, but to trade with the Ferengi they use these Non Federation Tokens, which have no real value.

  • IWantToFuckSpez
    link
    fedilink
    65
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I would have thought they’d be more of a Starship Troopers fan, since the satire would fly over the fash’s head.

  • Smuuthbrane
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 year ago

    StAr tReK is TOO DIVERSE, tHatS wHy I lIkE Babylon 5!

    [insert heavy breathing and unchecked drooling]

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Farscape is cool. Star Trek is cool. Star Wars is okay too I guess; not hating, I just don’t like them as much as the rest of the world seems to.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Disney did accidentally turn the two part story arc of space liberals restoring the status quo after it fell to space fascism into a three part warning that liberalism will always fall to fascism by allowing it to thrive in the first place by refusing to address wealth inequality and outright complacency in spite of all the warnings in the galaxy so that’s fun.

        • Seraph
          link
          fedilink
          211 year ago

          Obviously. Because Firefly is the superior show, right?

      • Smuuthbrane
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Haven’t watched it in years myself, but unless you can define “woke” I’m not going to make any assumptions.

            • Captain Aggravated
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Just making sure here, you want me to rigorously define the political position and identity of platformless reactionaries?

              • Smuuthbrane
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Not at all, in fact I’d rather “woke” be defined by what they really mean - feminism, inclusivity, equality, etc. Let’s make them say what they actually mean without hiding behind a nebulous term like “woke”.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Well let’s see, there’s an episode with a dockworker’s strike, in which a “negotiator” is sent in who’s position is basically “I’ll pretend to ask nicely but the only tactic I have is this in-universe law that says I can use the military to force you back to work.” The letter of that in-universe law (the “Rush Act”) is “The local military commander can break strikes by any means he deems necessary.” And Commander Sinclair decides to pay the dockworkers what they demand out of the military budget of the station. So the union ultimately wins.

        There’s several times when some character, often a human but sometimes an alien, walks up to some other kind of alien and says “We don’t want you FREAKS coming in and stealing our JOBS!” and they’re always depicted as obviously in the wrong. Basically in the script it says “A Republican happens, and gets dealt with.”

        There’s a whole episode with a religious exchange, all the various aliens are invited to demonstrate their planet’s “dominant religion.” When it’s the human’s turn, Sinclair takes the alien crew down a hallway with a long line of various different kinds of priests, ministers, monks, etc. The first guy in line is an atheist. The point being “Earth is diverse as fuck, yo.”

        The show just barely glances off a lesbian relationship, and the show’s attitude says “What? You didn’t have a problem with the five other romantic couples we’ve seen so far, what’s your problem with this one?”

        Oh, then there’s the whole major plot of a socially conservative president sliding Earth’s entire government into totalitarianism with the backing of a hostile alien race thing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        It has an alien species where the religious group has quotes that are directly from Carl Sagan (and they’re have more of a philosophy than a religion, at least in most ways). It generally treats religion with more respect than Roddenberry did, in a “all religion has some good parts to it, but extremism is a problem” kind of way.

        One of its major plot arcs is all about how democracies fall into fascism. I thought it was a bit heavy handed at the time, but now it feels too real.

        Skirts around a pair of characters in a lesbian relationship, but like most shows at the time, it doesn’t come right out and say it. They 100% banged one night, though.

        It’s also military science fiction. That always seems to invite right wingers who love the asthetic but ignore the themes. Same problem with Star Trek and Star Wars.

    • katy ✨OP
      link
      fedilink
      371 year ago

      she probably cheered for the bajor occupation or the government during the bell riots

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I maintain everyone on Battlestar Galactica was a Cylon.

      That or Cylonism can spread as an STD.

      This solves all plotholes, no further questions.

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    I’ve seen the anti-woke Star Trek.

    I had to stop when they invaded space Iraq due to WMD’s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I’ve overall enjoyed enterprise, even if it’s not my favorite. I don’t like how many multiparty storylines there are, but they weren’t so terrible that I stopped watching.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Does Starfleet not? Besides literally all of their ships. Because every ship that can go to Warp Speed is a planet killer based on the information in the show.

        Have you seen human history?

        Untrustworthy savages, the lot of them. A rogue species just temporarily acting reasonable for some nefarious plan no doubt.

        Now, before you explain that “No, the Xindi really did have it coming,” I have not watched Enterprise, and I never will.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          The xindi were lied to by a faction of the temporal cold war that was trying to keep them from joining the federation in the future. From there perspective they thought humans were trying to genocide them so they were defending themselves. I actually enjoyed Enterprise even if it’s not close to my favorite trek series

        • Captain Aggravated
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Enterprise Season 3 opens with a Xindi ship coming out of warp over Earth and cutting a 20 mile wide trench across Florida. Earth didn’t know the Xindi existed at the time, had no idea it was coming or why.

          Spoiler alert: the Xindi had been given faulty/false information that Earth was planning to attack them, by some other mutual enemy. IIRC it had to do with that “temporal cold war” thing they tried to push, which I’m convinced was someone in a writing room saying words without thinking about what they meant. What ensues is basically the Hell episode of Voyager stretched across a season.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            But I wanted the Hell Episode stretched across a season…