These scammers using Mr Beasts popularity, generosity, and (mostly) deep fake AI to scam people into downloading malware, somehow do not go against Instagrams community guidelines.

After trying to submit a request to review these denied claims, it appears I have been shadow banned in some way or another as only an error message pops up.

Instagram is allowing these to run on their platform. Intentional or not, this is ridiculous and Instagram should be held accountable for allowing malicious websites to advertise their scam on their platform.

For a platform of this scale, this is completely unacceptable. They are blatant and I have no idea how Instagrams report bots/staff are missing these.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        So here’s the thing I love watching YouTube in the mornings on my TV box while having my coffee and while getting ready to suck the days dick. I watch either music videos or podcasts that I am interested in. Does newpipe have integration into TV boxes / smart tvs? I guess I could always cast…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Man. I blocked them with my pihole because I got tired of max volume jump scares whenever I clicked on a link to their. Guess it’s staying blocked indefinitely.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Instagram is owned by Meta… Facebook.

    Facebook had no problem helping pedophiles distribute child pornography on their platform, terrorists and Nazis from organizing events on their platform, or allowing deceptive political ads that swayed the votes of democratic nations.

    Why would they give any fuck about fake Mr beast ads?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1631 year ago

    I’ve reported Nazis, violent threats, and literal child pornography on Instagram that then told me it didn’t go against their guidelines.

        • JackGreenEarth
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Can you be more specific? Like AI generated 17 year olds, or real photos of some 3 year old kid in someone’s dungeon? There’s a big difference.

          • Spaz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Both are children… So why does it matter? In USA under 18 is classified as a minor/child regardless if it is generated or not still illegal

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        As in child sexual abuse material. It’s pretty rampant on Instagram where they like to ‘hide’ under certain tags.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      But if you make a clear joke in a joke group, you get flagged and can’t get it reviewed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        No usually I report it to NCMEC who has better resources to deal with it. Cops very rarely care or are able to do anything.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      731 year ago

      I read between the lines: this is the content they support, so it’s not a platform for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        561 year ago

        I don’t think you understand how hard and resource-intensive it is to fight against the nipple crowd. I for one am grateful that they chose to do something about the real issues ! Yes, a world with free nazis is kind of a bother, but most of us would survive. Can you imagine the horror of a world with free nipples ? We would all be doomed, that’s for sure. /big s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    Enshittification has become the new way of life for tech firms like Meta.

    They lay off workers and decrease user safety, because that leads to more ad buys. This year’s record profits need to exceed last year’s record profits, even though a fourth of you are fired. More profit, or else…

  • Stefen Auris
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    I doubt they’re missing them. They simply don’t care and will continue to not care until something happens that makes the money generated by the ADs not worth it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    801 year ago

    Sounds like a good time to make Mr Beast aware of these, he has a lot of disposable income to burn on a lawsuit or three.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      These scam ads have been an issue for at least a year. I’m pretty sure they’re automated and there’s very little that can be done to trace them to their original sources. I’m sure if Mr. Beast did threaten to sue Meta, then they would just start filtering “beast” from ads.

      • PorkSoda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I’m pretty sure they’re automated and there’s very little that can be done to trace them to their original sources.

        Start by holding the ad account holder liable. When I worked in digital marketing and ran ad accounts, I had to upload my driver’s license.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          You live in a civilized country.

          There are others where you can get a stack of fake drivers licenses for a couple groshen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Honestly protecting vulnerable people from these scams is probably more generous than the usual philanthropy he does

  • Icalasari
    link
    fedilink
    691 year ago

    So what they are saying is they are willing to take liability and thus be open to being sued over this as they know of the scams but say they do not break community guidelines

    Got it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      Seems like Mr Beast might have a claim for a defamation suit since they’re actively allowing what amounts to identity theft and fraud on their platform.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 year ago

    On Twitter I’ve reported:

    • Pictures of dead babies/toddlers
    • Pictures of murdered people
    • Death threats towards public figures
    • Illegal videos of terrorist acts
    • Ads for illegal weapons (tasers)
    • So so much crypto spam

    Things found by Twitter to go against their community standards? 0

  • whatever
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    […] Mr Beasts popularity, generosity […]

    Mr. Beast feels so unlikable to me, I really can’t understand his popularity. But that’s beside the point, sorry. Fuck instagram!

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      My understanding is he gives a lot of his money away to various causes so I suppose that’s why people like him.

      But of course equally he is part of that annoying YouTuber trend of bouncing around the screen being very loud and thinking that that’s a substitute for personality.

      • whatever
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        It is an interesting business model. Good for the people he spends money on, but no one should have that much money to begin with. And I am sure he takes his cut.

        But without having watched many videos of him (about 2), his appearance just screams devious weasel to me.

        • Marxism-Fennekinism
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The two biggest charity events he’s had, Team Trees and Team Seas, he did literally nothing but pitch the idea. He was giving away luxury shit and engaging in his usual hedonism during the period he was telling his viewers to donate, and it’s not like he did any of the work either, he just contracted with established environmental nonprofits. So why is he there again? Why didn’t he just tell people to donate to those nonprofits directly?

          Also, he definitely profited from both charity events. All the videos have ads and he made no mention of donating the ad revenue so one can only assume he kept it (because if he was going to donate the ad revenue he absolutely would not pass up on making that known to everyone), not to mention the amount of engagement it brought to his other videos and his brand as a whole. That’s also assuming he doesn’t do what most influencer charity campaigns do and directly take a big cut of the donations as a marketing fee or something.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            He had you donate to him instead of directly for the same reason businesses ask you to donate to X charity at the registers - tax breaks. I mean, I’m not an account but I imagine this is why he did it that way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    I’ve stopped reporting obvious scams / spam on instagram because something like 19 out of 20 reports get ignored or denied

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      How do you even report ads on Youtube? I’ve been seeing the same obviously fake Elon Musk ad for some AI trading tool, and still can’t figure out how to actually report anything.