Title

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    ugh.

    I think a good way to avoid this for any other app in the future is to just use alternativea found on fdroid.

    … And disregard the rest :D

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      A fork is currently being worked on, called fossify.

      For now we have fossify gallery and calendar

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    sigh. Most people will just accept the new default permissions without blinking an eye. They’re taking advantage of people’s ignorance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You overestimate most peoples tech skills. They will never know because they have auto-updates activated.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      I mean it makes sense for error reporting. Lots of apps automatically report errors so that they can be detected easily, which would require internet access.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        that kinda makes me think google should to a log retrieval and storage api which can retrieve and send logs to developers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          That just allows Google full access to all logs from any application you have installed.

          That service is not free either per month and those costs will be passed to the consumer in either a subscription or worse software.

          • katy ✨
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            i mean google would have it anyway; and the app developer would be collecting the logs any way so the cost would be there already. this would just make it so they wouldn’t need to request full network access; just enough to get the logs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Lol me too, I swear. Thanks for reply . I’m in the land of oz. So I assume ur in america. Different laws Im gonna assume.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    581 year ago

    I’m really curious about the amount of money exchanged. It must have been an enormous amount in order to do a “I’d even sell my mom for that” and don’t feel dirty

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      There were multiple reports about sleazy companies reaching out to developers of popular apps and Chrome addons and offering them money for their accounts. The money is really good but there’s still a lot of devs that can say ‘no’. They will just use to track some people, it’s not a completely new business that will grow and earn them money like Instagram or something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      the developer, and this isnt exaggeration, does not understand gpl v3. he literally got confused when people told him he had no right to sell contributed code. you can see for yourself in the github discussions

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        You can sell GPL code. Even if you aren’t the author. What you must do is share the code with those customers though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            You perfectly can sell GPL code. And you can double-license yourself (provided that you are the copyright holder) as GPL and a privative license. A lot of companies do that, legally and correctly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m pretty sure what he sold was not the code but access to this play store account so that the new owner can push updated version to his current users.

  • Onii-Chan
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I’m just using the default GrapheneOS SMS app, but it’s concerning seeing the number of these FOSS apps lately adding major privacy invasive permission changes. Are there a few big companies buying them up for a quick buck, or what?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I’m just speculating here, but I’ve seen where app developers pull in a framework for a feature and it comes with all sorts of hidden gems since the framework was developed by a large corporation. The small development team now needs to consider writing their own framework (an established anti-pattern), find another (that may have the same problems or be less mature, etc) or include the privacy invading code and plan to replace it in a future release (which never happens because users want new features and the privacy concerned users have left).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not even close. This has nothing to do with SimpleApps.

        A crappy company bought them from the original creator and maintainer. This company is well known for buying mildly popular apps and inserting ads in them for monetisation.

        People who downloaded them from F-Droid should be fine tho.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            yeah, the most shady part of this is that SimpleApps’ code was available in Github. They could have just used that and upload it to the Play Store.

            why did they buy it from the developer instead? because thousands of people already had these installed, so when buying it from the developer they get to push their new, ad infested versions to the unwary users had the apps installed.

            This is a very dark pattern IMO.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yup, ZippoApps just bought this one. It’s a company that basically buys apps then pumps them full of invasive (bordering on spyware) bloat to capture the data from existing users. It’s a typical corporate strategy, where they buy a popular app, extract every single cent they can from it, then discard it once it’s a shell of its former self, for the next popular app.

  • adONis
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Did they forget to track the google maps history? someone should submit a PR

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    When I saw some serious issues with Clock app (from Simple Apps), I deleted and never used it again. So many apps and so many bugs, lol.