• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They won’t, because the politicians they elect will defend their base of support.

      This isn’t like when Obama/Pelosi went after ACORN in 2009. Or SCOTUS struck down the right of unions to fund raise for candidates under the Janis decision. Or FOX News spent months freaking out over the Ground Zero Mosque. Or Midwestern governors tried to cancel Sunday early voting in order to undermine “Souls to the Polls” black Evangelical turnout. These are people with real money and influence who aren’t to be fucked with.

      Conservatives will tap that reserve whole heartedly. Liberals will just shrug and say they can’t be taxed because of The Norms.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Effectively 1/3 of the US is Nones (and growing). I don’t have the breakdown in front of me, but a sizeable number are “switchers,” people who left their childhood religion.

      I’m personally now an ex-fundigelical antitheist, so I would relish the opportunity to report them!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why are you going out of your way to be apathetic? This entire thread you’re going about trying to stop people from doing something that hurts nobody, but the very people that want to fuck our country up. You’re assisting them with that attitude and behavior of yours.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    It’s a brazen effort to transform religious congregations — which are technically supposed to keep electoral politics out of the pulpit — into a campaign powerhouse for the former president.

    He spent much of the recent holiday weekend attempting to trash the legacy of a storied Christian reverend, Martin Luther King, Jr.)

    The law is rarely enforced, and has been skirted by churches of all political orientations — whether by pastors who make their personal endorsements public or by congregations organizing turnout-boosting efforts like “souls to the polls.”

    But Trump has made clear he won’t punish churches that violate the Johnson amendment in 2024, even vowing on a Christian nationalist broadcast last May that he’ll abolish the prohibition if reelected.

    During his podcast, Wallnau insisted that the Courage Tour will also be working with right-wing women’s groups including Moms for America — which touts “truth, family, freedom and the Constitution” — and Concerned Women for America, a group dedicated to “Biblical values and Constitutional principles.” Wallnau insisted: “We’re creating a broad net.”

    The movement poses a danger to democracy because it “sees no room for compromise,” Andrew Whitehead, author of Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States has told Rolling Stone.


    The original article contains 1,120 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      religious congregations — which are technically supposed to keep electoral politics out of the pulpit

      Why would large, well-organized, ideologically unified groups of people stay out of electoral politics?

      Aren’t these exactly the kinds of organizations you’d expect to be hip deep in political organizing and activism?

      The movement poses a danger to democracy

      I have to say that I think their views are often shit. But they are fundamentally popular shit. Hardly antidemocratic.

      Liberals would do well to fight fire with fire. Attend big social groups. Organize with your neighbors. Raise money, run candidates, and enforce ideological orthodoxy as a condition of membership.

      Hoping that some rules lawyers at the IRS are going to make Houston’s Second Baptist Church go away seems both foolish and unproductive.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Someone commented a while ago that “Nationalist Christians” is a better name for these groups because it conveniently reduces to an easy to remember abbreviation: NatC’s

    I really think we should push that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1011 year ago

    Remember, if you see or hear a church actively campaigning for any sort of politics you can report them and get their tax free status taken away. 👍

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      you can report them and get their tax free status taken away

      And remember, that report will go nowhere and you’ll accomplish nothing! The IRS has never gone after a church for this. Never. Reporting them is just as effective as quietly whispering “please tax them” into your pillow at night.

      I wish people would recognize the failures in our system and stop suggesting others do shit that doesn’t actually work.

      • theprogressivist OP
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Then what do you suggest? You obviously have better ideas? Or do you prefer to just bitch about things and not try to make a change?

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I also wish people would stop saying there’s no hope so do nothing.

        No, record them and send it to the IRS. If nothing happens then fine. Nothing was lost. Along with that work towards change. Telling people the system is broken so do nothing is not going to get you the change you want.

      • theprogressivist OP
        link
        fedilink
        351 year ago

        If enough get reported, especially since now it’s been vocalized and reported. They’re going to be forced to do something about it. I acknowledge it is wishful thinking, though, but don’t give up. Report these fucks either way.

        • Hyperreality
          link
          fedilink
          151 year ago

          Can I report a church I don’t attend, just so they become paranoid about who snitched?

          • theprogressivist OP
            link
            fedilink
            21
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yup, as long as they’re campaigning for Trump or campaigning for political figures in general, have at it.

            • admiralteal
              link
              fedilink
              121 year ago

              Someone with some cyberintelligence background could have a lot of fun setting their software to search for social media posts from pastors/churches looking for explicit political messaging.

        • Jaysyn
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Nothing at all will happen. I doubt you can find a single “legitimate” (with a real congregation & actual employees) church that has had their tax free status challenged, let alone removed in the last 30 years.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Branch Ministries in New York had it done in 92 after taking out a full page political ad in the newspaper.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Record it happening so you have evidence to back it up. Get it onto social media so everyone can help report it, too!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          201 year ago

          Doing something about it has a non-zero chance of success.

          Doing nothing about it has a guaranteed chance of failure.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s more pointing out how the suggested action is bullshit. It’s like if you had a leaking roof and someone said to blow soap bubbles on it. And then when you point out that’s a nonsensical solution that has no chance of working, they reply “oH, so YoU juSt waNT to Do NotHinG anD bE apaThEtic?”

          Pointing out that someones suggestion is a non-solution is not an endorsement of doing nothing. It’s pointing out that the suggestion is not helpful and distracts from actual solutions.

          Pretending the IRS would actually go after a church is ignoring the reality of the situation. I don’t want suggestions that would only work in some deluded made up fantasy world.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            It takes little effort. You’re saying to not do it, while also not suggesting anything to do. Your suggestion has an even lower chance of success than the OP, so if anyone shouldn’t be listened to it’s you.

            Collect evidence and submit it. Also work on getting better elected officials, unionizing, protesting, and whatever else you can do. If your suggestion is to stop doing something and not replacing it with something more effective then you should just keep your mouth shut.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              How about we throw a bunch of birthday candles in the nearest lake?

              And remember, you can’t tell me that’s stupid and unproductive because by your logic, that would clearly mean you are advocating for doing nothing.

              Are you starting to see how nonsense your argument is?

              • Cethin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I listed several other things people should also be doing. However, the IRS thing does have some amount of utility even if it does nothing at the moment. The IRS doesn’t have enough employees (on purpose) to look into everything, but if they get enough complaints and enough evidence they may. It at least creates a paper trail of they try anything bigger.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Jump on one foot and whistle.

              What’s that? You don’t think that will do anything and it’s an unhelpful suggestion?

              Unfortunately you just established that you can’t criticize dumb ideas unless you offer a working alternative, so I guess we’ll all just have to stupidly go along with my jump-on-one-foot-and-whistle strategy until then.

              /s

        • Jaysyn
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          I’ve reported a church, with photo evidence from multiple angles. Literally nothing happened.

          That law has never been enforced against a “legitimate” church.

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I didn’t know that was a thing that could happen

      I’ve got to do some research because my grandparents church has been doing this since Bush Sr.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      That’s the brilliant thing about the making politics about cultural issues. Churches can campaign for culture shit all day long. They just can’t say “vote for _____.”

      • Jaysyn
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even when they do, and I have sent in photos of a local church with “Trump 2020” on their placard, nothing at all happens to them.

        They aren’t even contacted as far as I can tell.

      • theprogressivist OP
        link
        fedilink
        35
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But Trump has made clear he won’t punish churches that violate the Johnson amendment in 2024, even vowing on a Christian nationalist broadcast last May that he’ll abolish the prohibition if reelected.

        But that’s exactly what they’re doing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    241 year ago

    If anyone finds any especially with video evidence I am more than happy to take a minute to report the shits to the IRS.