• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Gone are the days when your buddy is like “Hey check it out I drew you as a snow leopard!” at recess. That shit is now contraband.

  • Newtra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1391 year ago

    anthropomorphic behavior

    Anyone else morbidly curious about what happens if they don’t fix the bill’s wording and accidentally ban “human-shaped behavior” at school?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        That happened to me once! I was 15 and going to school, was riding a Lotus Eclair I’d fixed up. I entered the school zone and wanted to see if I could get over 25 mph. But there was a cop hiding and I got a ticket. I had to tell my parents, and I think they were impressed with my 31 in a 25 speeding ticket.

        The best part was having to go to court, and the judge asking how I got a Lotus (she was thinking of a car) and then upon learning the truth, asking the officer why he was wasting his time stopping a kid on a bicycle.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1041 year ago

    Humphrey’s bill, House Bill 3084, would ban “students who purport to be an imaginary animal or animal species, or who engage in anthropomorphic behavior commonly referred to as furries at school” from participating in class and school activities.

    This is, hands down, the worst description of furries I have ever read in my entire life.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      291 year ago

      So what I’m hearing is if I tell the teacher I’m a platypus I don’t have to go to class?

      Guaranteed if this law got passed there would be a high school somewhere where the entire student body shows up wearing cat ears.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I mean the impression I had for like a decade was essentially this. Then a guy sent me links on how to be his specific type of fantasy creature. It was sergel or sergal iirc. It had some really weird backstory and lore to the species detailing how they were warlords or something and I was really weirded out. It was very much like how some kids I went to school with would loose it if you told them that they weren’t whatever comic or movie character they were hyperfixated on, only more socially awkward and adults doing it.

      Anyway I feel like that’s as close as you can get without reading out someones entire backstory novel.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        …yeah that sounds about right for sergals, tbh

        Generally speaking, once you get past the “traditional” species like foxes, rabbits, cats, etc., and start getting more into the esoteric fantasy/scifi species like sergals, protogens, and yinglets, the people who create characters for those species tend to fall into one of two camps:

        • super srs “you must follow this lore to the letter or I will end you, by which I mean I will post a FurAffinity journal for my 7 followers complaining about your character diverging from the lore that nobody will pay attention to” types

        • “oh this looks cool I’m gonna make one and put my own twist on the design” types

        Funny story, the person who originally designed protogens tried to be the first type, but pretty much everyone ignored him and just did their own thing anyway

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        The above description would fit many many circumstances that are not furry related or problematic at all. Saying “I’m a cat. no, really” or meowing or licking your hand would all fit that description, (except not really because the word anthropomorphic is used wrong), but don’t mean a person is a furry. Moreover these behaviors by themselves don’t cause any problems unless you imagine a bunch of other stuff that’s not included in this definition.

        So it is an overbroad law that allows prosecutors to apply it selectively and at the same time is very hard to defend against.

        A better definition for the purpose of the law would describe some behavior that actually causes damage to society, like disrupting class or arresting kids at school for saying they are a cat.

        A better definition of a furry would probably include some kind of pattern of behavior and the extent to which it impacts daily life, as here

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        I wouldn’t use a definition that includes some kid prancing around race track pretending to be a horse. That’s just kids being kids and politicians need to stop sexualizing them.

        • AgentOrangesicle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Not even sexualizing, right?

          I love furry culture because I can see the art that’s intended for Magic The Gathering cards before it goes into print.

          The internet has to get over this furry shame and start collectively recognizing that a tail is like a necktie for your butt, and everyone should have one, because it’s rather flattering.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Ironically also means that it basically wouldn’t apply to anyone unless that person specifically wants it to. Performative outrage bill.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      yeah you see you can’t do the intelligent thing of just saying “you have to come to school with normal clothes on” which is literally what countries with a brain did. Also this is generally left to the school to set up. In France the law just says that a school is allowed to implement rules regarding clothing. Just simply think of P.E clothing. The law has a couple safeguard like you can’t ban a specific outfit for being from another culture (obvious) and the rest is left for the school to decide

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Like basically every school in the US has a dress code already. Don’t get this twisted into something else, this is purely performative nonsense by some backwoods inbred redneck.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I used to pretend to be a monster at that age. Would they have to call Monster Control?

        (I was a nice monster, like on Sesame Street.)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    I once met a person that was made to believe that “animal-kin” children were being given their own litter boxes in a similar way that transgender children would get their own bathrooms.

    The issue with the people who think like this is that they see a few things not like them (a few transgender people) and extrapolate it to utter nonsense (millions of children declaring themselves animals and demanding litter boxes).

    If they would think about what they are saying; they would reliaze that their claims are impossible. But then again, they are in their own reality where everything they do makes sense…?

    I’m sorry for using such an absurd example but it’s a thing older conservatives I know actually believe in.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I know I’m late to the party, but my go-to refutation is “Ok, name one school that’s doing that. Go ahead and look it up on your phone.”

      Then point out if a single school actually did have litter boxes for the kids the name of the school and everyone involved would be easy to find. It’s not something that could be kept secret: just one person has to say something – a kid talking to their relative, faculty, a parent, etc. Once that happened FOX, OANN, etc would be on that like flies on shit … and they would name and shame.

      But they aren’t, because it’s bullshit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        There were apparently some schools that had cat litter around because children can’t go to toilets during school shooting lockdowns, which is terrible in its own way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          I think that’s also made up propaganda. Kitty litter is used by janitorial staff basically everywhere (at least in the US) to clean up vomit and other semi-wet solids. Children are prolific pukers so it’s not surprising that basically every school has a bunch of kitty litter in their janitorial closets.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        That link explained what a fury is using the word “fursona.” 😂

        Also, thank you. I guess that rumor has to come from somewhere. Though the redirect for the article of where the tumor came from was behind a pay wall.

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    831 year ago

    This is going to really suck for the school mascot.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    It’s interesting that his official government website doesn’t really have any basic defenses. It allows you to message him without even making up a fake address in his district. Doesn’t even seem to check to see if you enter in bogus information like a phone number with all 5s. Also interesting that outside of hours calls to his office go right to a non-full mailbox.

    I do hope no one just calls outside of their posted hours and leave long messages talking about nothing or uses the website to contact him.

    Please no one do things like that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    At first I thought this was satire, but I’m seeing similar articles in tons of other places like Huffpost and Vice. So this is actually true?! Stay strong, my friends…

    (I don’t have a fursuit or see myself as an animal or anything, but this is crazy. And a total waste of resources too. Hopefully voters are educated enough to see that this is absurd.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      It’s true that such a bill was introduced, but wacky bills are introduced all the time. This is proposed legislation, they haven’t even voted on it yet, and it’s extremely unlikely to pass.

      But i think it’s also true that you can tell where legislator’s minds are based on what wacky bills they introduce.

      • AutistoMephisto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        As far as I can tell, Humphrey’s job appears to be one where he proposes bullshit legislation ad nauseam, just to waste the legislature’s time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What bugs me about bills like this is that many state legislatures have limits on how many bills a single member can introduce per session. Lots of good stuff gets put on hold because nobody is willing to use one of their slots on it. Then some asshats use their slots to introduce shit like this.

  • @[email protected]M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    I’m temporarily unlocking this post again, but I’ll be keeping an eye on it. I don’t want to see it descend into vitriolic lashing out at one another again. Come on, people, keep it civil. This is supposed to be a fun and welcoming community for everyone, and I want it to stay that way.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    Imagine being an animal control guy and having a school seriously call you and ask you to take a stranger’s child because of that child’s participation in a subculture.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Imagine having the cops called on you for being a child predator when you’re just animal control.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I don’t think I’d have the willpower to avoid responding by calling them pigs on the loose. I’d already want to be dead as animal control tasked with catching furry schoolchildren.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Imagine working for the state and being ordered to engage in a random citizen’s kink.

      Yes, I know being a furry isn’t just a kink.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        being ordered to engage in a random citizen’s

        That’s called oppression. Also furry is an identity, believe it or not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 year ago

            There aren’t fursuits in class and the bill is worded so broadly that saying “meow” would violate it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              Ah well I guess I assumed the bill was written to remove people wearing fur suits to class. In general yeah, you shouldn’t remove someone from class because they’re a furry.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                A bill prohibiting fursuits in class, beyond how rare it would be for a student to have one in the first place, would be redundant anyway, because I’m pretty sure such things wouldn’t fit most schools dress code anyway

        • Rayspekt
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          I’m not buying the “furry isn’t just a kink” thing at all, but please enlighten me. How does it qualify as an identity?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            “Furry” is just yet another accepting group that is easy to get into for people who feel like they don’t belong anywhere and others. It’s quite simple and the same as many other things.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Did they say “in the same way being trans is?” A person’s identity encompasses far more than just their gender and sexual orientation, things like hobbies or career or group affiliations are absolutely part of who a person is, so being a band member would fit. Not in the same way or for the same reason, but they didn’t say that it was.

                • Rayspekt
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  I didn’t stop reasoning. You did, as you have no answer to my ad absurdum argument lol.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Belonging to a fandom or other special interest community is typically something that is done through self-identification, which is different than identities that are not chosen, but still part of a broader idea of identity. There are plenty of examples of these self-chosen identities: Trekkies, Potterheads, Bronies, Cumberbitches, etc. Simply watching Star Trek doesn’t make you a Trekkie though, it’s a label people apply to themselves when they feel invested in that thing and want to be part of a community of people who feel the same. That’s all. I also hate to tell you that there are themed sex parties at Star Trek conventions too, so does that make being a Trekkie a kink? Is doing the Vulkan salute and telling someone to “live long and prosper” in public forcing that kink on others?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            I doubt any kid is gunna wear a full mascot costume to school outside of the actual school mascot. Those costumes cost thousands of dollars to buy and at least half a grand to make from scratch and proper cleaning and maintenance means it fits into furry culture in the same function as wearing a tux . It’s a rare highschool student who can afford one and a rarer one who would risk wearing one where it might be ruined.

            The most you are likely to see is Halloween style cat ears and tails of the variety that are readily bought at the gift shop of a zoo… Which kids love to wear because kids like animals in a “I’m pretending I’m a tiger grrr rawr!” schoolyard kind of way.

            Kids like weird stuff and have a narrow band of time to play pretend and express themselves beyond adult judgment. Trying to up the humiliation factor and traumatizing kids for doing regular kid stuff and coming down hard on a largely made up problem is just double mild weak sauce in action. Guy’s a jerk.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I don’t know if any kid beyond the age of like 5 that acts like an animal. 30 years ago when I was in school it was never a thing either.

              There’s a huge difference between a kid (under 10) and a young adult (17, 28 or older) doing this stuff. You know as well as I do that Furries aren’t just a group of kids playing as animals on the playground for an hour, it goes a lot deeper than that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                I mean 20 years ago it was already a thing. I have enough friends who were at very least furry adjacent to know that for the majority of them it was basically a lower key funny art thing with an element where people were expressing themselves kind of the same way they resonated with like horoscopes and things with a fashion element. Like we had people who wore cat ears because they thought they were cute or drew avatars of themselves and their friends as animals because of some sort of perceived caracature of your traits physical or personality based.

                Cosplay culture was something that was on the rise when I was a kid but being a goth was huge when I was in school. It was all skulls, vampire shit, and leather spiked collars, bracers , trenchcoats and fishnets and kind of kitschy fake witchcraft you pretended was actually spooky … But of all the kids that kind of were into it most were completely oblivious to how many of those fashion elements came from the bdsm and fetish community and really couldn’t have cared less because that wasn’t why they liked it. SO many of us were complete prudes by any standard. Like, of my cohort of goth kids about 75 percent of us were still virgins when we graduated.

                Teenagers like to play dressup just like your 5 year old does, that’s why anime conventions are so dang popular. We’re just old now and the stuff changes and it doesn’t make sense to us.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Wearing cat ears or drawing someone as an animal isn’t as extreme wearing a full-body animal suit and telling people to call you “buttercup”, that’s the shit I’m talking about.

                  Also you can’t even compare being Goth to being a Furry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Pretty sure that will leave the animal control people open to being charged with botched citizen arrests. Not sure what Oklahoma’s particular arrest laws are like but for most States you are pretty limited in what you can do to perform one and the standards of places you can use to detain an arrested person in are usually at least required to be humane and actively monitored.

      The answer to "Little Timmy wore a tiger costume to school for Halloween do you have a cage available? " should properly be “Get fucked authoritarian scum I have actual work to do.”

  • ivanafterall
    link
    fedilink
    311 year ago

    $10 says the state legislator responsible for the bill is whatever the most-outlandish type of furry possible is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Probably one of those weird fascist ones that everyone else in the fandom wishes didn’t exist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Right?! Furries aren’t even remotely on the public conscience so how the fuck does he even know about them otherwise

    • vraylle
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      As a sad citizen of Oklahoma, I wish I could upvote you more than once.

      • Draconic NEO
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I wouldn’t joke about that if I were you, vote manipulation is a big problem on Lemmy and since the tools for detection aren’t very good (if even there at all) it might cause people to suspect you of cheating the system.

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    431 year ago

    Jesus christ do these law makers just have nothing going on? We should really be revoking their pay for what is a complete dumpster fire of a waste of our taxes. I don’t want my money going to some white racist dumb fuck basing reality off of Fox news rage articles in his Facebook feed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      They observed that half of the population loves catty, bitchy, high school mean girl Jerry Springer drama. It’s intentional.