🙄

  • Aiden
    link
    fedilink
    402 years ago

    Mmmm yes. Can’t wait to X about this!

  • Gormadt
    link
    fedilink
    1942 years ago

    Ffs

    Yes change the name and iconic logo of a huge corporation, that will go over great.

    If he hadn’t demonstrated his incompetence earlier I’d think it was intentional.

    I still think there’s a bit of intent to destroy the company but it’s kinda hard to tell.

    • fearout
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I saw this article posted in another thread and it seems to explain a lot. Not sure how close it is to reality, but it looks like nostalgia is at least a partial reason for this change.

      Yep. Fucking nostalgia.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        It makes a lot of sense!

        To err is human, repeat the mistake is foolish

        Thx for sharing the article!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1212 years ago

      There’s a woman over on Mastodon making the argument that he’s trying to destroy it so it can’t be used to organize left-leaning political action (fundraising, activism, issue messaging, etc) any longer. She makes a compelling argument.

      • Xerø
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        I’ve been saying the same thing in multiple Lemmy posts and on Mastodon. Twitter and Reddit were both used by progressives to organize.

      • bedrooms
        link
        fedilink
        962 years ago

        I don’t buy that. He tried to cancel the purchase. He’s also losing money, and so it’s definitely not a 3D chess.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          492 years ago

          Didn’t Twitter almost take him to court if he didn’t follow through with the purchase? I think he got caught in his over investment in Twitter last year, and rather than go through a trial with discovery (I think he NEEDED to follow through to avoid this specifically), he decided to go through with the purchase. I wonder what the hell they would have found during a trial discovery that made him sink $44B.

          But what he’s doing now? I don’t think it’s related to that. I think it might be to help manipulate stocks, as we have seen him do several months back. Maybe he thinks that destroying left-leaning political action saves him in taxes? He destroyed public transportation in California just so people would theoretically purchase more Tesla cars. Nothing is beyond being trampled by Musk if he thinks he can benefit by stumbling over the other side of the corpse.

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              On “behalf” of Twitter. What a fucking clown.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            92 years ago

            Yeah, he was way too cavalier with the documents he signed while negotiation with Twitter. It would have cost him $1Billion to back out. But that is a bargain compared to what he had to do to come up with the $44B he paid for Twitter.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          292 years ago

          Not only that, it would have been easier and cheaper to just shut the whole thing down after taking ownership. His very public (mainly by his own tweeting) stewardship of Twitter is damaging to his reputation, and the reputation of his other businesses. The reality is, he just is that dumb.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            112 years ago

            His net worth has only gone up since he bought it, iirc. Tesla will continue to print money at least for a little while until other automakers catch up on EVs. SpaceX doesn’t seem to have any viable competitors, and both sides of the aisle agree on privatizing space, so that’s a big growth industry. This is the unfortunate fact of capitalism in general and late-stage capitalism in particular.

            • Ech
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              His net worth has only gone up since he bought it, iirc

              It absolutely didn’t. His net worth dropped over 50% in the months following the purchase. It’s back up above $200b at this point according to Forbes, but he’s still down from his pre-purchase state.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            If he’d just shut it down, he probably would have been personally liable for Twitter’s debt, because he didn’t even try.

          • DJDarren
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            He’s the consummate failson. Rich enough that he’ll never actually experience any tangible negativity from his various ventures, if he has a skill, it’s in self-publicity and (historically) throwing money at ventures that are already on an upward trajectory.

            But I feel that all the cocaine and being surrounded by Yes Men have led to him tipping over the edge.

      • Nepenthe
        link
        fedilink
        42
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’d believe it if I hadn’t already heard of Musk being the type to fire workers in his line of sight at pure random simply to fire someone. It apparently got so bad that aids would plan the route he would take to the meetings around having as few victims as possible out in the open.

        It would be a smart move for anyone, and he is succeeding to a good extent (they’ll just go elsewhere?), but I think that’s just a happy accident of his. I feel like he’s really just using it as a chew toy so he can feel all big and important with the headlines. If he were being journalistically gray rocked, I wonder what he’d do.

      • Big P
        link
        fedilink
        312 years ago

        The issue with that argument is… Why? He is a business man, activism generally doesn’t effect him, tesla cars are generally liked by left leaning middle class, why would he spend so much money to destroy something?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          152 years ago

          One factor is his obsession with crypto and Blockchain shit. Left-wing activism generally stands against that stuff because of the environmental impact. Additionally, right-wing political movements recently have been lowering safety standards in business. Bad for the worker, but great for the bottom line.

      • blazera
        link
        fedilink
        202 years ago

        he bought it pretty soon after a meeting with Putin, while the Ukraine invasion was fresh and international support was rallying on Twitter. So, blackmail, bribery, buy up Twitter and immediately gut it.

    • EnderWi99in
      link
      fedilink
      372 years ago

      I believe his main goal is turning Twitter into something of an “everything” site where he’s looking to combine the likes of Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Discord, and Venmo/Paypal into a single service. I don’t know if it was his goal when he bought it or if it has any chance in hell of working, but that’s something he at least said (while probably drunk) fairly recently.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        He has had this dream of an everything app for a very long time. I feel like he is trying to realize it now.

      • Kresten
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        This reminds me of when snapchat tried to entire the mobile cash industry with they snapchat pay service.

      • Daniel
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        My first thought was an all-in-one “life subscription,” kinda like how you can buy those iPhone + Apple One packages, but with Tesla (I don’t know if Tesla has subscriptions to them – but I’m sure they do), Twitter Blue, and Starlink. It’s pretty dystopian and hecka freaky.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        Yeah I saw that and cringed. Why would you give Andrew Tate money. It removes all plausible deniablity and proves that you want people like him posting on your platform.

    • melroy
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      Ṯ̸̛̠͈̜̮̠͉̖̩͈̦̖̰̺̦̳̞̣͍̖̮̩̩͔̟̇̾̽̄̔̊͂̕͝w̶̘̖͓̮͓̉̀̀̿̈́̀͗͂̂̑̆̐̀͌́͗̑̑̊̈̅̇͒̊͋̚͘̕͘̕į̸͖̪̪̟̭͔͚̼̳̏̈͒́͑͒̈́̿̔͆̀̿̏̒͝t̶̡̘̟̣̀̾͛͂̒͆̆̂̇͘͠t̷̡̨̖̖̤͎̬̜̬͈̙̱͖̼͚͇͕̘͈̔̎́̅̈́̉͒́̚͜͝͝ͅę̴͕̥͎̙͉̗̜̟͔́̀̾͐̿̑̉̀͐̂̚r̵̢̢̦̰̰̣͖̯͎͚͙͇̯͈̙͔͇͉͈̩̖̝͉̅̏̿͗̆̀̀̈́̔̀͊̓

    • CarlsIII
      link
      fedilink
      392 years ago

      There’s a band I heard of called “:(“ and I’ve never been able to find it since

      • lukini
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        There’s a Japanese youtube channel that makes music under a blank name with blank titles. Thankfully you can google “blank japanese youtube channel” and it shows up lol

        • CarlsIII
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Heh, there’s also a Japanese band that used to be called…X

        • CarlsIII
          link
          fedilink
          282 years ago

          Wow, thanks! I’m not sure this is even them but it’s a band called :( so I’ll take it!

    • Big P
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      At least he didn’t name it something that’s a generic name for a concept that exists on almost all social media sites like… I don’t know, “threads”

    • Nepenthe
      link
      fedilink
      61
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m opening up a rival called “social media.” Already, we’re on everyone’s lips, set to have a userbase spanning half the web.

  • skellener
    link
    fedilink
    402 years ago

    I think they should go with 💩Shitter - it’s where most people use it anyway.

  • freamon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    'Cos it marks the spot where he buried all his treasure, amirite?

    • roofuskit
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      I don’t know about ALL his treasure, but he definitely buried 35 billion dollars in there. Never to be seen again.

    • EnderWi99in
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      Why are you even there still? Mastadon has been a solid alternative for me for a while now.

      • Vashti
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        Absolutely nobody I know is on Mastodon, and despite my efforts, they won’t move because it’s “scary” or “bad” or some bizarre shit.

        Yes, I’m frustrated.

        • Rob Bos
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          I met a bunch of new people on mastodon. Sometimes you gotta. :(

    • MoogleMaestro
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Some of them are just too far invested to see the light. It’s actually pretty sad to see twitter addicts fail to migrate to any of the plethora of alternatives.

    • Roundcat
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Hell no. If there is one thing I learned from moving over to fediverse, it’s that people are what make the site enjoyable or frustrating. As it is now, I enjoy the userbase here and on Mastodon, and the last thing I would want is for the most insufferable of Twitter users to come and ruin it. I’m happy most people who are quitting Twitter are joining the other alternatives. I would rather people join the fediverse as a more deliberate choice based on what we offer.

  • 👁️👄👁️
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    RIP his SEO. I know it’s part of his goal for an “everything” app. But, this name is just terrible and is going to be a nightmare to look up. Not to mention how much history will refer to Twitter and not a single letter.