The man who stole and leaked former President Donald Trump and thousands of other’s tax records has been sentenced to five years in prison.

In October, Charles Littlejohn, 38, pleaded guilty to one count of unauthorized disclosures of income tax returns. According to his plea agreement, he stole Trump’s tax returns along with the tax data of “thousands of the nation’s wealthiest people,” while working for a consulting firm with contracts with the Internal Revenue Service.

Littlejohn leaked the information to two news outlets and deleted the documents from his IRS-assigned laptop before returning it and covered the rest of his digital tracks by deleting places where he initially stored the information.

Judge Ana Reyes highlighted the gravity of the crime, saying multiple times that it amounted to an attack against the US and its legal foundation.

  • rustydomino
    link
    fedilink
    English
    561 year ago

    I don’t know if this sort of thing is allowed, but if outsiders can donate money to his prison commissary account, I will definitely donate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2161 year ago

    The judge compared Littlejohn’s actions to those of the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, noting that, “your actions were also a threat to our democracy.”

    Because stealing and releasing tax documents is the same thing as attempting to violently overthrow the government.

    • AnonTwo
      link
      fedilink
      521 year ago

      So the judge is in with trump. Hope none of his cases go that guys way.

      Like yeah, he broke the law and needed to be punished. But it wasn’t government secrets, which i’m pretty sure is already legally coded separately from this guys crimes, and also neither of which are treason, which would be the capital attack.

      So the guy blatantly spoke against his own legal experience for a political swing.

      • fmstrat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        This same judge has sentenced many for J6.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        She was appointed by Joe Biden and is an immigrant to this country from Uruguay. I don’t think she’s a Trump sycophant, I think she’s just a lawful pedant and a fan of hyperbole.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was going to argue that the attack on the Capitol (though your spelling may more accurately reflect real life) was not treason. No enemies were afforded aid or comfort.

        Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or imprisoned and fined, and incapable of holding any U.S. office.” [emphasis mine]

        Now I’m rethinking my life. How could I have been so wrong about such a pivotal event in my life?!

        (For any of your assholes thinking I’m a 01/06 sympathizer or apologist, I doubt you personally know anymore more angry. Given my druthers, I’d ask the court to impose the death penalty and carry it out personally. And I’m not some angry, young, keyboard warrior talking. I’ve thought on this much.)

    • SaltySalamander
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      Friend of mine recently was busted with an ounce of pot, he was compared to Al Capone in court by the judge. Judges can be straight sociopathic.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Fucking judges are blowhards stuck up their own ass wanting to make the judgments they hand down sound more important than they are.

      It’s all about feeding their giant fucking egos.

    • SeaJ
      link
      fedilink
      531 year ago

      Apparently Norway must hate democracy since all of their tax returns are public.

    • Hegar
      link
      fedilink
      991 year ago

      “your actions were also a threat to our democracy.”

      This is one of those exciting sentences where you have to substitute ‘democracy’ for ‘rich people’s yacht money’.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        I disagree. As commendable as his actions are, he clearly broke a law that is there for a good reason.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          But how did it endanger democracy? Every president ever has willingly released the documents he leaked. How were his actions dangerous?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “Trust in the system” is a resource that needs managing. If the contractor got off lightly, it would erode the trust people have that the IRS will manage their information.

            Let alone the fact that a light sentence for a guy who leaked the administration’s foe’s information would be incredibly corrupt

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    611 year ago

    Coming from. Sweden where all tax records are public, it seems insane to get 5 years for revealing taxes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      If revealing tax records works… Don’t You think 🤔 that The Greatest Nation on Earth would have done it by now ?

      /S

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      291 year ago

      Yeah, and wasn’t Trump supposed to show his tax returns the moment he became president and promised he’d do it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        It wasnt only Trumps returns

        According to his plea agreement, he stole Trump’s tax returns along with the tax data of “thousands of the nation’s wealthiest people,” while working for a consulting firm with contracts with the Internal Revenue Service.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I’d like to know this too. Apparently it includes jef bezos and elon musk.

            Also where to find trumps taxes, the internet is dominated with news about his punishment but not a single reference on where we can find these leaks

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          The last seven years have shown that we can no longer rely on norms or moral codes or anything like that. It should all be codified in law.

  • Don Escobar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    Can you imagine the storm in truth social if Biden pardoned this guy lmao, cmon Biden!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Honestly, not sure why this is a crime. If I was rich as hell I’d be like “you want my tax returns? why so you can have a crywank?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Eh… it’s a crime because he wasn’t even supposed to have access, and in order to get access he had to break the law.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      If I was rich as hell I’d be like “you want my tax returns? why so you can have a crywank?”

      That’s why Trump didn’t release them, he isn’t rich as hell

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1601 year ago

    That’s RIGHT! Releasing Tax Returns gets you MORE Jail Time then trying to violently overthrow the United States Government and HANG the Vice President! That will teach Hostile Countries to MESS with US!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      551 year ago

      The way we turned our backs on Afghani interpreters who tried to get asylum here should have shown Charles Littlejohn what happens to people who fight for America

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        He probably knew. There are more stories of bad outcomes for that kind of shit than good ones. The fact that he did it anyway is why his actions are so admirable and heroic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Exposing a convicted criminal is a crime against the US and its legal foundation? GTFOH.

    On the other hand, maybe said “legal foundation” is said to protect those with money and influence and punish those who dare to move beyond the systemic injustices present. Maybe this judge was correct after all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      401 year ago

      …because the leaker plead guilty. If he went to trial this would have taken longer.

      Does no one read the article or understand basic legal processes?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Technically the pleading guilty part is also in the footer below the post for users on desktop, but I was making a statement about due processes rather than complaining Charles case was too quick. Kind of akin to how a person mentions the beauty of the colors of clouds or the dread incurred by a coming storm just for somebody else to come along and yell “…Obviously. Does nobody watch the forecast or understand basic meteorology?”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        So let me ask you something. What do you get out of this? Hanging around in places where you believe that all the people are wrong and foolish? Waiting for some comment that’s just low enough hanging fruit for you to know enough to have a basic response to, does this satisfy you? Your statement is no shit and your question is rhetorical. Do you just like standing in the middle of a crowd and screaming, denoting yourself separate and superior? Is this what you do online?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          I like to have a diversity of thought and thought the Fediverse of all places would be promoting that. Instead everyone lumps into tribes and follows groupthink without question.

          I’ve been here since LW started and belong here just as much as anyone else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        A lot of people just want to be mad. This thread is full of people saying he should just be released, without realizing that if we release him because we happen to like the outcome, what’s that saying for the next person who wants to break the same law.

        Don’t get me wrong, I’m as happy as everyone else that he did release the documents, but he broke the law to do it and knew the consequences when he did so. He knew this was a possibility.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    801 year ago

    He was providing a public service since trump refused to release them like every other presidential candidate has done for decades. This should be considered the same as whistle blowing.

    • Schadrach
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Why? No legal requirement to do so, it was literally something that started when a candidate did it to show how honest and transparent he was and caught on. It’s not illegal activity to refuse, so whistleblower laws don’t apply.

      Also, even if they did for Trump’s returns, he released a lot more than just Trump’s returns so he’d still be in the hot seat.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is a law which requires the IRS to turn over tax records for high government officials when asked by Congress, and Trump ordered his head of the IRS to ignore the orders.

        Now admittedly this is not the same as being public, but I don’t think that there are rules preventing Congress from publishing this information once received, so it is in practice public.

        Plus Trump promised to publish his tax returns, so basically he should be thanking this patriot for saving him the trouble.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The guy is a government employee, but he’s not Congress. In fact, we should be able to trust that the government won’t publish our records to the public because some guy who works there feels like it.

          You allow it in this case, who knows whose records get leaked next time?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            You’re correct, the leaker is not Congress. Congress was denied the ability to see the President’s returns because President Trump and his subordinate broke the law and refused to supply his returns to Congress when asked.

            This law does not apply to everyone, just high government officials. I’m the worst case anyone in a high position in the US government would be forced to have financial transparency, and I’m okay with that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              I’m saying for all the people defending the leaker, that wasn’t the correct way to do it. Sue in court and see what comes out of it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        You’re not allowed to say that here.

        Breaking federal law is only bad if you’re on the right.

        Its insane how hypocritical many LW posters are while claiming they want to save our democracy, freedom, and the rule of law. Laws only apply to people you disagree with.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          36
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He got a longer sentence than many of the January 6th rioters. The reality is he committed a crime against billionaires and the Jan 6th dumbasses only committed crimes against public officials despite the latter criminals being more violent.

          But I guess crimes only count when they affect the ultra wealthy plutocrats.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            He got a longer sentence than many of the January 6th rioters.

            That’s not the topic of any of my comments at all.

            Many posters are ignoring basic facts of law and how courts work, just because they feel wronged.

            Do I think the difference in length of sentence is fair for this leak vs jan 6 rioters? No it’s not fair, but that’s an opinion unrelated to the speediness of this trial entirely.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Many posters are ignoring basic facts of law and how courts work, just because they feel wronged.

              So what you’re saying is that the commenters here are humans with biases and feelings about perceived injustice?! This is a travesty. People should really strive to be as robotic as possible! If a serial killer gets off on a technicality, welp guys that’s just how shit works sometimes and you aren’t allowed to express feelings about that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                Sure, but those same commenters also ridicule the other side for being uneducated and not understanding the law or operating based on feelings rather than facts.

                Pot, meet kettle.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Right yeah the problem we have is then expressing feelings about Hillary Clinton. Not that they are objectively wrong about most of what they think about her and other dems. /s

                  If they had their facts straight they’d be well within their rights to want her and others locked up

        • 🦄🦄🦄
          link
          fedilink
          201 year ago

          You’re not allowed to say that here.

          And yet they did. Shocking. How does that fit in your narrative?

        • Dark Arc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          Of all the laws to pick and choose on, I’ll happily pardon this one.

          Trump literally said he’d do it and then didn’t.

          Every other president in recent history has done it.

          It’s not like someone forced him to eat his hat. He was forced to follow a convention that he’d already told people he intended to follow.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Depends which laws, doesn’t it? There are different ones you see (give him a break, guys he’s learning)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Trump (like the bulk of the right) believe and act as though laws and norms are used solely to protect yourself and punish those they don’t like. Much like the paradox of tolerance, allowing these people to hide behind rules and norms they won’t respect themselves isn’t healthy for democracy, freedom, or the rule of law - the best way to protect those things is to keep the likes of Trump out of power. You’ve already seen what he’ll do with democracy given half a chance.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Keep him out how? By any means necessary, even illegal and unamerican ways?

            Is this the “paradox of democracy” now?

            The only way to save law and order is to not follow law and order? Do you realize how Fascist that sounds?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              No - I mean actually have him face consequences.

              Biden has treated him with kid gloves for multiple reasons - mostly because he doesn’t want to be seen as uncivil or disturbing the status quo. There’s massive scope to do more without getting into illegal territory.

              How fascist does it sound, exactly - please enlighten us.

              Of course, if we took Trump’s recent insistence that nothing the President does can be seen as illegal, Biden could just send SEAL Team 6 to kill him - but this is the attitude we’re defending the democracy against.

              What does “unamerican” mean to you?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        You’re not wrong but I feel you might be being overly specific. It’s not just the US that protects their wealthy – this would happen anywhere – some places maybe a little less harshly, but plenty would be more harsh, too. The Panama Papers journalist was killed “extrajudicially”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Littlejohn leaked the information to two news outlets and deleted the documents from his IRS-assigned laptop before returning it and covered the rest of his digital tracks by deleting places where he initially stored the information.

    I guess he didn’t do a very good job of it.