• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      292 years ago

      English taxpayers paying for another coronation ceremony be like: 🥶*

      * can’t pay to heat their house.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Don’t knock it, we get a day off when they die and a day off when we get a new one.

        Sometimes we get a day off when they’ve been on the throne for a set number of years.

        So for that reason I’d like to keep them.

        Give us two extra bank holidays a year, and you can King Ralph all these motherfuckers.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I mean, it did bring more money into the economy than it took out of it, same with Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral, so we could profit off of this

    • Pyr
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      And least he got to be king first :P

      I haven’t seen any new coins yet with his face on it. It may be the shortest run of coins with a new face. I’ve had the same face on my coins for my entire life, these will be the first with a new one.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Shortest run was probably Edward VIII. My dad found a coin with Charles’s face on it. I also bought a few commemoratives. I think it’ll probably start appearing on £1 coins soon as they are the newest

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        V, for anyone wondering. And there might be a William V in Luxembourg too, so I eagerly await the two getting mixed up in amusing ways.

        Or, alternatively, he could go with his “Louis” or “Arthur” middle names, which would be good for different jokes.

  • Guy Ingonito
    link
    fedilink
    772 years ago

    It will be so funny if he takrs a sharp turn downhill and dies. Dude was famous for never getting a chance to be king and then to go out so quickly would be * chef’s kiss *

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Do you think they have any compassion for the random proles like us? Like they could divest themselves of wealth to help people, and just live luxurious lives instead of gold flakes in food lives.

        I think any human being with enough compassion to deserve treatment as anything more than a hostile enemy would do that

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          I think they’d have compassion enough to not laugh at somebody’s cancer diagnosis, yes.

          I’m all for disliking the institution. Doesn’t mean I think he deserves to have cancer or it would be funny if he died.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            82 years ago

            He literally chooses every single day to actively ignore the plight of the people he claims to rule. He does nothing

            Every single day he actively chooses to ignore suffering, probably even cracks jokes about it, while actively working to preserve his enormous privilege and protect his kin from facing consequences for their heinous actions. He stands at the head of an institution of violence, racism, cruelty, and exploitation and every single moment of his life he chooses to side with that over any earnest attempt to redeem their reputation.

            The entire justification for their privilege is so insane it makes phrenology look respectable.

            He is horrible, he could help so many people with a few words and the equivalent of pocket change but he chooses not to for fear of starting a process that ends with him living as one of the ordinary citizens he claims to protect. It’s fucking bananas that you think there is some moral reasons to extend civility to such a monsterous person.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                42 years ago

                It’s not brave or noble to police expressions of anger at oppressors it’s just foolish. It won’t make society better, civility is just a tool the powerful use to enforce the status quo.

                He chooses to let someone starve over feeding them, this is fine a civil behavior. I call him a fucking cunt for doing that and wish death upon him and this is uncivil behaviour and I lack compassion? nonsense, it is compassion that fills me with rage.

      • Guy Ingonito
        link
        fedilink
        172 years ago

        It’s okay to wish bad things happen to a monarch billionaire landlord, actually. It’s good and rad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        If I ever have a golden piano while someone on the planet goes cold and hungry at night you can draw and quarter me.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The type of cancer has not been revealed, but according to a palace statement the King began “regular treatments” on Monday.

    Buckingham Palace says the King “remains wholly positive about his treatment and looks forward to returning to full public duty as soon as possible”.

    He will postpone his public engagements and it is expected other senior royals will help to stand in for him during his treatment.

    The King, 75, returned to London from Sandringham in Norfolk on Monday morning and the palace says he has commenced treatment as an outpatient.

    Although he will pause his public events, the King will continue with his constitutional role as head of state, including paperwork and private meetings.

    UK figures suggest, on average each year, more than a third (36%) of new cancer cases were in people aged 75 and over.


    The original article contains 280 words, the summary contains 139 words. Saved 50%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Chainweasel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      462 years ago

      No, he’s completely out of the running unless all of King Charles children and grandchildren mysteriously die

    • Lath
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      I think it’s primogeniture monarchy, so it’s from parent to child. Next in line is Charles’ firstborn.

  • LanternEverywhere
    link
    fedilink
    39
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Prostate cancer is very common, very survivable, and very easily treatable. It’s a serious health problem, but he’s almost definitely gonna be fine

    Me fail reading comprehension. The article says it’s NOT prostate cancer

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    562 years ago

    The royal family, including Charles are big proponents of homeopathy. Let’s see how much homeopathy is going to help him now. I’m sure at least as much as those alternative methods Steve Jobs chose helped him, back then…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      You’ve got to be kidding me. Is it corruption or stupidity? As in, are they selling vials of contaminated water as medicine or are they just known to trust pseudoscience?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        132 years ago

        The water/solvent isn’t even contaminated. It is deluted so thoroughly, you can’t even find a single molecule of whatever ingredient is supposed to show any effect.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        It’s hypocrisy and the typical rich bozo alienation syndrome, they have easy and unlimited access to best medicine in the world, so it’s easy to forget that others don’t and promote charlatanerie. It could also be malicious if we look at how they don’t do anything against gutting the healthcare.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      i mean one of king charles issues has been furthering cancer research…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      Yeah the news and world news subs really took a tumble of late. I came for some modicum of intellectual debate, but it’s a shame how quickly that derails.

    • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      I’m begging liberals to remember the one cool thing they ever did, which was chopping off their monarchs’ heads, and commit to that. Just that. Come on now, this is an argument that’s been solved for like 200 years now: monarchs and aristocrats are dogshit and deserve to be forcibly removed from their positions of wealth and authority.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      I dislike the royals, but ultimately any person suffering with cancer is deserving of sympathy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      Do you want a list of the atrocities committed by the English monarchy?

      Hate for this family is deserved

    • Alien Nathan Edward
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      for this guy, who leeches off the work of real human beings and hides child rapists from justice? absolutely, my hate for him is a source of strength and pride, I’m glad to have it on display.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          I mean, having some water nymph toss a sword at someones feet is at least as good of a justification for governmental power - and if I’m honest, a better one at that.

          It’s like 40% more creative than “I have all the money and the big boogey man in the sky said I have the right to reign supreme - who are you to question God?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      So if he croaks and his brother and sister and niece and her fried Stacie all croak, who’s going to be kind? You guess it! Rufus the cat.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      802 years ago

      I have 0 sympathy for monarchial families living off the backs of UK taxpayers for… Centuries :|

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          272 years ago

          As an American, if I got cancer like this dude has, having a job there is a very high chance I’d be destitute IF I lived. World class medical treatment off the backs of his subjects… yeahno my dude, worlds smallest violen playing.jpeg

          He can wipe his cancer tears up with whatever the largest denomination of pounds you guys use is xD

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            I’m not sure I follow. I know health insurance in the US is often tied to a salaried job, so if you have one, then why would you be destitute ?

            Now I’m not British, but I agree with the sentiment

            • A Phlaming Phoenix
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              Because insurance pays for a portion of your treatment, rarely 100% of it, and the moment you start racking up bigger bills, insurance starts looking for ways to not pay your claims. They’ll put a hold on payment until you call them and broker a deal or they go back and forth with your doctor demanding that you receive some treatment other than what that doctor recommends.

              I have Crohn’s Disease, an autoimmune disorder that is often treated with immunosuppressants. First, they did not want to pay for my initial “loading dose” because it has to be done by infusion. That’s a ~$25,000 procedure (3-4 hours on an IV). I talked them into it by telling them that only the first dose would be by infusion and the rest by self injection.

              But when my company decided to pay for a less expensive insurance plan that started at the beginning of the year, they suddenly didn’t want to pay for the injections either. Now I owe 30% of the cost of my injections. That’s almost $4,000 a dose that I take every 8 weeks, about $25,000/year.

              So now I use a coupon program through a separate company, and they bill the remainder of the balance to the company who produces the medicine who give me a $21,000 annual credit toward paying the remainder. So now to get my medicine I must coordinate between my doctor, a specialty pharmacy, my insurance provider, a company that runs the coupon program, and the company that produces the medicine… Just to get a syringe delivered to me on a schedule. And the credit probably won’t last until the end of the year; I’ll probably end up shelling out a few thousand for my meds around Christmas time this year.

              If any of the complicated web of companies that collectively get me these meds doesn’t have everything lined up in their system, I don’t get my meds. My last dose was almost three weeks late to me because of all the calling around I had to do. Because we don’t have a central health care authority, that means each company maintains their own system of record. Each phone call involves working through a phone tree to get to a human agent, working through the same set of identity verification steps with them, explaining the situation over again to a different person every time…

              It’s a real pain in the ass, and they do it on purpose to get you to give up. Having insurance doesn’t mean your health care is paid for, and you pay a premium (hundreds of dollars) on every paycheck to keep the insurance that still doesn’t pay for your medical costs. Having health insurance does not mean you don’t still pay through the teeth for your health care. Having health insurance does not mean that health care is accessible to you. Having insurance that makes health care accessible today does not mean they won’t change the rules behind your back, and that you will still have access to health care tomorrow.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                what the actual fuck… thanks for sharing your story and I wish you courage. Have you considered moving ? given the severity of your condition ?

                • A Phlaming Phoenix
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 years ago

                  It’s always a consideration, but the question is where would we move to (and how much am I willing to uproot my family)? Canada is a nice place with a better healthcare system, so maybe there? But that’s expensive all on its own, and I have to consider that I have two autistic kiddos who are currently receiving their education at the best school in the state for special ed kiddos. Is it worth it? Maybe not. For now, I think we should stay where we are. I love it here, except for the high cost of my own care. Think I’d rather stick it out and fight for a better system here. Maybe we can improve things for everyone instead of jumping ship.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 years ago

                  All things considered, their situation is not as bad as it could be. I had a job where one of my duties was to get prior authorizations for every procedure we did in an oncology-focused plastic surgery clinic. The vast majority of the procedures were breast reconstruction following mastectomy and skin cancer excisions. I had an insurance company demand documentation and evidence of medical need to close the incision site after excising the melanoma. They were gracious enough to allow the excision without requiring a prior authorization, but in order for the surgeon to close that incision (or in this particular case, fill in the area with a skin graft because the amount of skin to be removed precluded a simple closure), we had to file a mountain of paperwork on a tight deadline because the procedure couldn’t wait more than a week or so.

                  I’ve also worked in hospitals, and every hospital I’ve worked in has social workers on staff to help patients line up emergency insurance coverage or financial assistance for emergency medical care. I never actually saw the bills for it, but we treated a kiddo that was a bystander in a drive-by shooting that was transferred to our hospital from another ER so that they could have the pediatric trauma surgeons try to fix his femur. So that’s two top-level ER visits, an ambulance ride, an ICU stay, and probably a bunch of surgeries and associated hospitalizations…because this 2 year old got hit in the leg with a stray bullet. The total almost certainly topped 7 digits. Shit’s fucked, yo.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              162 years ago

              If you have seen breaking bad, the premise of that show is an apt description. Insurance companies here will often deny you necessary life saving medical treatment for… reasons

              Other example: a woman with a family history of breast cancer was denied a doctor recommended mammogram to check on some potentially cancerous lumps because she has… Already had too many mammograms.

              Profit incentive in the healthcare industry is no bueno:|

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            102 years ago

            But he’s British and we have a good NHS so that’s kinda a weird argument

            I hate the royal family but for reasons that many sense

          • Scribbd
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            And when a president gets COVID he gets drugged up and gets the best treatment on the taxpayers dime. While the people are left with life shattering medical debt.

            While these subjects can get medical treatment, for just a fraction, and no debts… Like the king…

            So what is your point?

            We have been playing the whole sad orchestra for you guys, seeing you push out this attitude like it is a win over something.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              The president has an actual job tho??? Like wat lmao 🤣 and if you think the king is getting the same medical treatment as Mr jo British bong water, I have some EU membership to sell you.

              • Scribbd
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                A new tiny violin joins the choir.

                And it is not the dig you wish it is. As it portrays even more that anyone in the UK, even those without an actual job, can get medical treatment without fearing massive medical debt.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  That’s not addressing my point of… Why is the king receiving preferential treatment? His role is ceremonial. You could make the argument he’s paying for private treatment (I don’t know if he is or not), if he’s not why does he get to skip the NHS cancer treatment wait list? If he is paying for private… What exactly has he personally done to allow him to have the ABILITY to pay for said treatment:| Not saying all the royals wealth should be seized for the peoplez, more why is his families life style still to my understanding being subsidized by British tax payers? The tourism they bring in would still be coming, it’s not like they’re going to sell Buckingham palace if the gov stopped paying for their shit.

          • katy ✨
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            i mean we have the nhs in the uk, so it’s not really the same as the us since everyone here has access to the nhs

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        The royal family brings in a net positive amount of revenue of you account for receipts from added tourism and spending. The expenses for shipping around the US President for example is another story.

        • Jojo
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I can’t speak for other tourists, but I don’t need the royals to actually still exist to be interested in seeing their accoutrements strewn about museums and to walk through their former palaces to admire the woodworking and gilding.

      • katy ✨
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        it’s pretty silly to say they live off the backs of uk taxpayers when royalist tourism brings in more tax revenue than anything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Remember all the circlejerking about how Lemmy was kinder than Reddit? Nah it’s the same maybe worse, with a heavy heaping of communism sprinkled in.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 years ago

    Could this new development mean that it is possible that his reign may not be a bit shorter than his mother’s?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I dunno if we want to see a 142 year old Charles. We saw how decrepit Phillip looked by the 2000s, and then in 2021. Imagine what another 40 years will do on top of that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    I just got my first Chucky Buck this weekend, we can’t switch to a new currency this quickly! Our economy is in shambles!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      See mate, the mint make a profit on money, do you think it costs £50 to run off one of them little plastic things.

      Edit: just realised you were one of our dear Canadian brethren. See hoser, the Canadian mint make a profit on money, you think it costs a loonie to strike of them little metal things?