• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I’m guessing because they haven’t been paid their share of the profits and savings. FTC only cares about themselves nothing more.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Like when do big mergers like this not end in layoffs? The redundancy in management wouldn’t make sense. Like what does the FTC think Microsoft was going to do? 😆

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      It was more than just managers and redundant positions that were laid off. And it was mostly blizzard employees laid off specifically.

      Also

      /no please don’t attack this innocent multi trillion dollar company

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I don’t think he was defending the company, more saying that OF COURSE they’re going to do big layoffs, it only makes sense, and so if you (the courts) don’t stop them, then well… You don’t blame a lion for hunting a gazelle, it’s just what they do.

  • Ashy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Ah good house cleaning at Activision Blizzard was long overdue …

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    751 year ago

    Microsoft reneged on promises it made in court…

    If those promises aren’t legally binding, then why take them into account in the first place?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I will literally never understand why the word of a corporation has any weight if it isn’t bound by law.

      You need to force corporations to act if it’s against their own interests.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      It is because the billionaires write the laws through ALEC. The only part of the system which isn’t working as intended is that they had to make any promises in the first place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And I’m not too happy with how capitalism chows down on the poor like the fucking Oroborus it is yet here we fuckin are.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    791 year ago

    Damn, would be crazy if they succeed in undoing the merger. Would be nice to see some consequences for blatantly lying to the court.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        301 year ago

        Hmm, SCOTUS can see no issue with that argument. Passes historicity test for what the founders intended.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Except it doesn’t but that hasn’t stopped them from making up history in the past, even in the very case they set that test… Blind mice for referees.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      Well I for one am shocked to see a megacap do significant layoffs after M&A, talk about breaking with tradition!

  • Vaderhoff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 year ago

    I don’t think I’ve seen a game studio acquisition happen without layoffs of some sort. Doesn’t make it right, but it does seem like a horrible routine.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think I’ve seen a game studio acquisition happen without layoffs of some sort. Doesn’t make it right, but it does seem like a horrible routine.

      It really depends on if the layoffs were done because they were duplicate people for the same job position, versus clearing house so that the stockholders are happier by having better profits.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        401 year ago

        Stock markets love capex, hates opex.

        “Well done, you’ve spent 75 billion to buy market share!!”

        “Oh no, you would spend at least 230 million/year for these employees - that just won’t do”.

        Nevermind the fact that 1900 roles also buys market share (and you could run 1900 people for 300+ years), but opex is opex and execs are bonused on margins.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          251 year ago

          And the worst part is they will then brag about how low their opex is to the employees that are still there in the quarterly all-hands, as if it isn’t representing how much money they are making but not paying to employees. Well, ok, the worst part is the doing rather than the bragging, but still.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Idk, I’m starting to think that the shamelessness of bragging to your employees that you’re fucking them over is worse. At the very least, the employees should feel insulted that they’re supposed to be excited about it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I wonder how many even realize that operating profit even is the money they make after paying every single expense including salaries.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Generally, the ones who understand the numbers are making enough that they don’t feel as fucked over. In my experience, anyway

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          201 year ago

          For the unaware:
          Capex=capital expenditures. These are the one-time purchases, which grow the business.
          Opex=operating expenditures. These are the recurring costs of doing business. Payroll, utility payments, rent for office buildings, etc…

          Basically, the stock market loves it when you buy things. Stock owners see it as growing the company, and therefore growing the value of the stock. But they hate operating expenditures, because those make the company seem less valuable; Buying Activision (capex) is great for stock prices, but paying their employees (opex) isn’t.

          This is why big corporate acquisitions are usually immediately followed by huge rounds of layoffs for the acquired company. The new company owns the things, but doesn’t want the opex to show up on the next quarterly expense report. So they’ll usually gut the acquired company. Because they’re usually buying other companies for things like copyrights, patents, trade secrets, etc… If they were interested in the employees at the acquired company, they’d be using recruiting tactics and headhunting, instead of simply buying the entire company.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Yeah but 1,900 staff, come the fuck on that’s a mass exodus not a layoff. I’m in a company of 300+ people and it’s a HUGE number of people, I can hardly process over 6x as many layoffs…

      • Vaderhoff
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Oh absolutely agreed. It just sucks that this isn’t unusual, no matter how small or great the number. Hope the peeps get snatched up by better studios

  • Vaderhoff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    This also pretty shitty on account that Kotick initiated loads of layoffs just before acquisition talks were even public. This is usual practice to make the company seem more valuable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Bill Clinton, chief executive of U.S. Government, a division of MCI-WorldCom, praised Monday’s merger as “an excellent move.”

      I’ll be… they even predicted the “sovereign citizen” movement!

    • nicetriangle
      link
      fedilink
      50
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s a book called The Media Monopoly that details how media companies have consolidated to just a handful of mega corps and the book had to be republished 5 times since the 80s because every few years the number keeps shrinking dramatically. The author later released a brand new book called The New Media Monopoly which is essentially the 7th edition of the original book and at this point we’re in a fucked up late stage version of the problem he originally detailed.

      From the Wiki on the author:

      In 2000 Bagdikian stated, “Every edition has been considered by some to be alarmist and every edition ends up being too conservative.” In this latest version, Bagdikian wrote that the number of corporations controlling most of the media decreased to five: Disney, News Corporation, Time Warner, Viacom, and Bertelsmann. He argued, “This gives each of the five corporations and their leaders more communications power than was exercised by any despot or dictatorship in history.”

      The Onion is a bit too accurate sometimes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Then there’s the entire idea of Corporations. They used to be limited to government issued charters. Now they’re independent shield entities for rich people with human rights.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      Bill Clinton, chief executive of U.S. Government, a division of MCI-WorldCom, praised Monday’s merger as “an excellent move.”’

      LMAO

  • nicetriangle
    link
    fedilink
    671 year ago

    The actual fuck did they think was gonna happen? Literally everyone saw this coming except the FTC somehow I guess.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      941 year ago

      The FTC argued this would happen, it’s the court that swallowed Microsoft’s tripe. This is the FTC’s “I told you, bro!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      341 year ago

      The FTC knew it was coming, and tried to stop the merger. But they got shot down in the courts, because a judge believed Microsoft was going to be benevolent and not immediately lay off all of the acquired company’s employees.

      This is the FTC’s way of publicly slapping the judge.