My partner and I were discussing this over dinner, our ideas went from buying up land to finance organic farming and distributing it at the lowest price to crashing the financial system to “reset” everybody’s bank account with no possible recovery. Any other ideas?

  • keeb420
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    Idk probably buy the Amazon rain forest and then hire blackwater or whatever their name is to patrol it and make sure no logging or clearing or anything else is taking place. The indigenous people can use the land for their needs but no one else.

  • xc2215x
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    Spend it on the poorest countries around the world.

  • Nutomic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Buy a major social media platform and run it into the ground. Oh wait…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Unpopular opinion; A big mass suicide. Just give money to the family of anyone that offers to die. World wide.

    Popular opinion; make an american “charity” 😂

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Start going around to banks and pay off mortgages - but only for people with like less than $1000 to $2000 in the bank. that would change lots of lives, quick.

  • Hypx
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    The simple answer is to give it all away in some way. The notion that you can personally do good with that money is the delusion of every billionaire.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Trees. I’d plant as many trees as possible across the world.

    And an old dogs sanctuary. Just because.

  • Scew
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Probably just throw it at people until I run out. It’d at least help people up front.

  • HousePanther
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    With 100 billion dollars, I would spend all of it on housing to end homelessness. Let’s just provide homes for as many people as possible. All of it would get spent on this if I had my way.

    • blanketswithsmallpox
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      200,000,000,000 / 200,000 = 1 million homes.

      There are about 140 million homes in the USA.

      You have ~2.5 people per home in the USA.

      You would essentially be able to buy everyone living in Chicago or Houston their own home per population.

      Chicago, IL (Population: 2,670,406)
      Houston, TX (Population: 2,378,146)

      • HousePanther
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        I think I would rather work with a builder for higher density housing simply because the money could be stretched further. We need to rethink the concept of housing and homes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 years ago

          Bet you could buy a lot of teepees with that money and increase the curb appeal of tent cities.

        • Instigate
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I think you’ve touched on a great point as to how some of the money should be spent - finding the brightest people with the best ideas and adequately funding them. Yet another folly of most billionaires is that they think they have all the answers; if you’re able to eschew that idea then you can really get some serious bang for your buck by not going full-blown Elon with the Captain’s Calls.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I’d do this and then turn it into a socialist hell hole where I censor everything that looks like it came from Storm Front. And when conservatives birch and moan for rhetoric that is Storm Front lite, I’ll remind them that the platform is private and duck their feelings

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        immediately going hard authoritarianism against individuals. Hitler would be proud. Read some sociological theory please. If you want to nationalize all corporations, you are on the right path. But if you want to immediately go “big brother” it shows you are just a petty tyrant who would probably be even worse then our existing society.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Buy and open source as much farming, education, housing, medical and general automation technology and is practical, then deploy non profit supply chains to allow even the furthest reaches of the planet the ability to acquire and implement this technology.

    Subsidize the edges of this supply chain to ensure the most disadvantaged get equal access

    With everything that remains, acquire the means of productions (farmland, housing, mines, wells, roads, rivers) that are in private lands and set them up with an autonomous non-profit democratic anti-privatisable organisational structure built to exploit those resources for the benefit of the local population.

    Basically, it’s doing the exact opposite of the “enclosures” and then making sure it doesn’t happen again.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enclosure

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Sugrue

  • ssillyssadass
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    First I’d find out how to make the money grow ethically

    Then I’d invest in fusion power and green power, invest in lab-grown meat, invest in atmosphere cleaning, perhaps start some well-funded schools in areas of low education, sponsor some hospitals, etc.

    I think I would also try to get asteroid mining to take off.