• overt_mess
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    he’s probably right though, most porn site operators have more integrity than politicians.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They put the office floor plan in the leaks, lol, everyone knows where Bob in accounting sits in the office now… That was 100% an inside job, either a disgruntled employee or someone got a job there with the intent of doing some corporate espionage.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    He should volunteer to provide his info then. Lead by example right?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    281 year ago

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Hey, guys, do you pinkie promise to securely track users with no legal standards or requirements in place? This guy will have shocked Pikachu face in 3, 2, 1, …

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They know it’s not secure, they’re hoping it will broadly stop (or at the very least, extremely hinder) people from watching porn

      Making anything that isn’t missionary position between a married man and woman under the covers with the lights off for the sole purpose of procreation illegal has been a long standing goal of modern conservatives, and they’re currently inching their way there

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    371 year ago

    The porn companies should together agree that they will create a public record of all conservative politics viewing habits if the bill is passed. This would kill any bills in a millisecond.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    So hey Pierre.

    I’m no fan of the LPC from a long time back. But you are convincing me that a Conservative majority will be a shitshow.

    You might just snatch defeat from the jaws of victory with this braindead stupidity.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Let’s hope they do. They are a dumpster fire. I’m fine with perpetual minority governments with NDP Liberal and Green coalitions or supply and confidence agreement. Give me electoral reform damn it.

    • kubica
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      Faith. And tactical “oopsies” when the thing that was expected really happens.

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Because he’s a fortune teller. Or he thinks he is.

  • Max-P
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    Because porn sites are known to be serious, trustworthy entities that definitely don’t have a long history of distributing viruses and scammy penis enlargement products, and generally trustworthy ad networks that aren’t spooked out by porn as their source of revenue. They totally wouldn’t sell user data as extra income.

    There totally won’t be fake porn sites that needs your credit card and now your ID to verify your age and identity before they show you all those hot chicks in your area.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cyber security 101 in the early 2000’s. Rule 1: never expose your true identity. Today: Ron Johnson at 24 Albatross Lane is watching anal porn, again.

    • Poggervania
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      I love how everybody was all “NEVER GIVE ANY INFO ONLINE” until corporations realized you could make bonkers money, then it very quickly shifted to “GIVE ALL YOUR INFO ONLINE”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    I don’t trust people to write secure code.

    I really don’t trust people who run low-margin, sketchy businesses like porn sites to write secure code.

    That’s the issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        One of the reasons I don’t run my own webserver, or mailserver any more, or Lemmy/Mastodon instance now, is because I don’t want the liabillity of having to deal with content I don’t control. I’m amazed people run these at all, because it’s trivially easy to end up hosting very problematic content and get the attention of government in truly unpleasant ways.

        I cannot imagine anyone anywhere in this chain wants the liability of trying to gatekeep content via ID like this. It’s a technical impossibility, and a liability quagmire.

  • Track_Shovel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Want to see how hypocritical the conservatives are? Replace the word digital ID with masks or mandate

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    This guy is why IT needs to train everybody at work every year to not open attachments from people you dont know, but he still somehow does.