• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    It’s kind of ironic seeing people post something here and being downvoted. Kinda just proves their point.

    • mars296
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      Not necessarily. They could be down voted because what they mentioned is hated for a good reason. Like if someone posts “Nazis” or “cancer”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So if someone said that people hated nazis and holocaust denial “for no reason” and was downvoted into the dirt you’d say that proved their point? Sometimes people are downvoted FOR A REASON. That does not validate their point in a thread like this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      Add men to the list.

      Misandry is also extremely widespread and socially acceptable.

      IMHO both groups have bad apples. In conservative societies, women are often mistreated. In modern/contemporary societies men are often misstreated.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        adult men are treated fine in modern societies, it’s boys/teenagers who are feeling increasingly out of place and are turning to misogyny as an outlet

  • Extras
    link
    fedilink
    241 year ago

    Optical discs (blu-rays, DVDs, cds, etc…). I hate that I have to justify buying one or having a collection.

  • TruthAintEasy
    link
    fedilink
    741 year ago

    Oh lots of things

    Women
    Ethnicities
    LGTBQ+
    Drag Queens ( they are so entertaining)
    Inconvenient truths
    People who hang toilet paper the wong way
    The French (cowards? They won more battles than anyone and have mastered the art of standing up for themselves)
    Furries
    Pineapple on pizza ( its good, Ill die on this hill)
    Bronies
    Caillou - not, that whiney snot deserves it
    Marijuana
    Ned Flanders
    Bell bottoms
    Satan ( the word in acient hebrew that we translated to Satan first appears in the book of Job, and would more accuratly be rendered as accuser of prosecutor. In the whole bible satan only goes after 10 people, and only when god tells satan to do it. Half way through satan is like ‘um god? This guys like, broken now. Call it good?’ But that rapscallion god was like ‘no, he could still recover keep hitting him’ and all that because god ‘knew’ Job was the most loyal and devout of his followers and his narcisism just couldnt help but make a grand display of proving it)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Drag queens are wonderful. I finally got into Drag Race (just not a reality show viewer generally), and those queens will totally tug your heart strings if you just watch, and they’re real artists too. RIP Chi Chi DeVayne.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bronies deserve it because they still haven’t denazified. Furries are a mixed bag with half being outright pedophiles and the rest being insanely cool people, with bronies it’s a guarantee they have at least one filly in their spank bank. But in either case if a nazi comes along trying to start shit with either i’m shutting that shit down right away because they don’t have the right to get on a high horse when they’re 20x worse.

      • Exocrinous
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        None of the furries I am friends with tolerate Nazis

        …anymore

        MOST of the furries I am friends with did not ever tolerate Nazis

        TBH I do know someone who has a “not checking if the character they’re posting porn of is underage” problem, and I’ve actually only seen them do it with human characters, though they have no special preference between humans and anthros.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I’m really hoping it’s something that they figure out over time, but it’s going to be a lot of work so probably nothing that will happen overnight.

          • Exocrinous
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I don’t really think the sexual violence rates in the furry community are higher than in the general community. There’s just more awareness of what consent is. I mean I could say “look at r/jailbait, straight people have a pedophile problem”, and I’d be right, but only because society has a pedophile problem.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              That would be true if every single porn site was at or worse than r/jailbait, which to be honest does feel like the case at times.

    • JackFrostNCola
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 year ago

      The pinapple on pizza one is weird to me, do these people not enjoy the idea of contrasting and complimentary flavours?
      Savoury + sweet is a good combo and they dont seem to have a problem with tomato on pizza if they are getting technical over ‘fruit’ being an ingredient.

      • Patapon Enjoyer
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I think it’s more that pineapple flavor is really overpowering on a pizza. And on drinks. I think people dislike ginger (to a lesser extent) for the same reason.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Well, I hate pineapple and putting it into things just kind of ruins the thing you’re adding it to anyway, so there’s that.

  • ReCursing
    link
    fedilink
    701 year ago

    Nickelback. I mean they’re not good but they’re not really bad either, just a complete nonevent. They don’t deserve the hate they get, they don’t really deserve anything

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Dispassionate takes on controversial issues.

    There’s always atleast two sides to each story and more often than not the truth is somewhere in the middle. If you think something is clear-cut you’re almost guranteed to be mistaken and misinformed and many of your dearest beliefs are totally wrong.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I’ve taken to letting people know my opinion that if they are omicient they are wasting their talent arguing about piddly topics with subjectives like myself

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Dispassionate? Could there be a better word? I think I know and agree with what your saying but I don’t think that’s the correct word.

    • Big P
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I think social media, particularly Twitter, has bred this. Twitter is designed in a way that makes it impossible to have an actual structured debate and instead encourages short and unambiguous statements which cannot possibly accurately encapsulate an issue

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know you probably already hate me for mentioning it, but foot fetishes. It’s a very common fetish people have and I don’t think people should be ashamed of it. It’s not even the weirdest fetish out there when it comes down to it. I understand the stigma comes from weird dudes asking girls for feet pics in creepy ways and I feel like that’s reasonable. But most of us are just regular people just trying to live our best life. I used to feel comfortable telling women I’m with that I have a foot fetish and most of them were even down to give it a try. Nowadays I’m too embarrassed or ashamed to even mention it and when I do I get shot down more often than before because of this stigma. I’m more comfortable these days telling someone that I’m bisexual than telling someone I like feet. Which I guess is a win for the gay part of me, but it still sucks.

    • speck
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      ngl, having my toes sucked sounds good rn

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I spent some time explaining amputee fetish to my CW the other day (which is actually called body identity integrity disorder). I’m just glad there are people who like their limbs and appendages attached.

    • ugh
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      You should avoid judgemental sexual partners anyways. Foot fetishes are considered “weird” if that’s how you phrase it. Generally speaking, it’s not that uncommon. Don’t open up with a partner about kinks unless you trust them not to run their mouth.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        In that regard I definitely agree with you. It could even just be the people I associate with. If anything the people that have given me the most shit for it are other guys that I have as friends.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      I’m not into that at all (tbh I find feet kinda disgusting) but I’ve never seen it as something really weird because it really isn’t that weird.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    Pit-bulls. Most of their bad reputation comes from organizations that campaign against their very existence and people will quote pit-bull bite statistics with the same lack of irony as a white nationalist quoting FBI crime statistics about people of color.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      I worked as an insurance agent. In the states I had my P&C licenses in, we were legally required to base rates on data. i.e statistically how much the company paid out in claims given certain factors. One of the things we based rates on was the breeds of dog people owned. Pitbulls and certain other dog breeds do not just have a bad reputation because people irrationally fear/hate them, they actually do pose a greater risk. Just like teenagers by and large, aren’t as safe drivers. It isn’t “fair” in that the dog didn’t choose to be the breed it is and some of them really are good dogs but statistically, averaged over the whole, they are more of a risk than other dog breeds are.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        One of the things we based rates on was the breeds of dog people owned. Pitbulls and certain other dog breeds do not just have a bad reputation because people irrationally fear/hate them, they actually do pose a greater risk.

        This is a classic example of someone observing a statistical correlation between specific factors and using that to assert a direct causal relationship between them. It implies that an insurance agency is able to 1) accurately identify every single breed of dog in every single insurance related incident (which is definitely not the case, because I doubt every insurance company is doing genetic testing on every single dog it comes across) and 2) tie a causal relationship between dog breed and incident. If I were going by typical insurance metrics, and to borrow from your analogy of “teenagers as unsafe drivers,” you would also assume that red Camarros, something more expensive to insure than your more conservative sedan, were statistically more dangerous than, say, a white Civic, as if they were what caused their drivers to get into car accidents, as opposed to young, reckless people interested in a fast sports car to simply go out and buy one. These are people who would be reckless behind the wheel of any car, but who are statistically correlated with a particular type of one. But you still mark the red Camaro as more expensive to insure regardless of who buys it because it’s statistically correlated with a higher degree of accidents.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            The causal link is implied. When someone says “Pitbulls and certain other dog breeds do not just have a bad reputation because people irrationally fear/hate them, they actually do pose a greater risk,” this is another way of saying that a particular breed of dog is innately more dangerous than another. Not that it has the potential to be more dangerous, but objectively is. The only logical deduction from this statement is that there must be something about the animal’s breed that makes it this way. It’s literally the exact same logic used by people who cite FBI crime statistics in order to paint specific entire ethnic groups as innately “more criminal” than another ethnic group.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          These are multibillion dollar companies (actually they insure trillions in assets) whose whole job is to be very very good at assessing risk. You thinking you know better is peak Dunning-Krueger.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Question: Does his company factor FBI crime stats into it too? Why not? “Despite being 12% of the population black people commit 50% of crime” and suddenly now since it’s optically bad to charge black people higher rates “causation only equals correlation when we can’t be called racist for it?”

            That shit don’t sit right with me tbh.

            And what about German Shepherds that have bit 11 secret service agents? Secretly pits? Hating pits but not other large breeds is frankly silly imo (unless you hate black people too because the only important thing ever is statistics). At least hate Chows too, since they’re arguably more aggressive, and German Shepherds, Presas, Boxers, Rotts, etc. Shit at the very least German Shepherds were the Nazis dogs and they’re the ones the cops use now, and they’re “not” “bred to attack” over pits? Come off it.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You can’t just accuse me of what I’m accusing you of because I accused you of it, that isn’t how this works.

                I left out how the pit breed happens to be particularly popular with minorities as well btw, which makes irrational pit hate itself a racist dogwhistle (pun intended). I think I’ll add that in now. Gotta have a white people dog like a Bichon Frise huh? None of those dogs “the rappers” like? You disgust me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “If a big corporation says something is one way, it must be so. They have a lot of money, after all.” Your argument is peak “Argument to Authority.” I guess it’s a good thing those insurance companies like AIG were able to effectively assess their degree of risk exposure in the housing markets in 2008 and avoid collapsing when the housing market imploded. Oh, wait…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              OMFG there is no evil conspiracy by USAA and every other insurance company against pitbulls JFC. Pitbulls are just statistically much more dangerous than other animals.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                They’re statistically correlated with incidents of mauling. Nobody is denying the statistical correlation. But there is a difference between observing a statistical correlation between breed and maulings and asserting a causal relationship. My argument is that the assertion that “pit-bulls are innately, biologically predisposed towards violence against people and other animals” is not supported by meaningful evidence. If you are arguing that they are, then you’re gonna have to convince me with more than “insurance companies say they are.”

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  Quick thought experiment - magically replace every pitbull in the world with a chihuahua instead. Do the number of maulings go up or down?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How many owners are morons that wanted cool mean dog though. I’ve known dog owners that get those breeds specifically and they have no understanding of how to treat a dog. Like they’ll get a working dog and an cage it all day then wonder why it’s aggressive. I’d like to know the difference. Because too many people get dogs for looks and don’t actually give a fuck a about the dogs soul.

      Sorry if I come off aggressive, I just talk like that… I’m genuinely curious about this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        How many owners are morons that wanted cool mean dog though.

        This is sort of my point. A pit bull that’s socialized, well trained, and cared for is generally very safe to be around. A pit bull that has the opposite kind of life? Well, what kinda dog wouldn’t be an asshole under those circumstances?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Sure but then the problem is moron owners, not the dog or it’s breed. Those morons could be just as cruel to a German Shepherd, Boxer, Rottweiler, Presa Canario, Bullmastiff, etc. Nature vs Nurture I guess.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Okay, I’m trying to understand your argument here. Are you saying that pitbulls are being racially profiled and that information from other dogs aren’t being collected or that bites of the same severity by other dogs aren’t being correctly gathered or are bring suppressed? And, if so, what are the factors that should be taken into account when discussing dog bites or dog aggression?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I think the reason they are making that comparison is that there are a lot of other factors that feed into the final numbers. Crime stats aren’t a final determination of the inherent criminality of different groups of people. Things like poverty, arrest rates, and conviction rates all skew the numbers.

        With pit bulls, people often get them because they want a dog that’s “tough” and they essentially train (or don’t train) them to be bad dogs. The dog itself isn’t at fault.

        Anyone who’s been around a lot of dogs will tell you that small dogs are more bitey. The fact that a pit bull is stronger and can do more damage is also not the dogs fault.

        • TruthAintEasy
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          The real difference is pitbulls bite to kill, most other dogs dont. Any dog can get triggered, but certain breeds like bullies and dogos, ridgbacks, they bite to kill. It is as instinctual as a pointer pointing or a sheep dog herding.

          Just watch a lot of footage of a shepard attacking a human vs a pitbull. The shepard generally goes for the arm or leg and the bully drags you down so it can go for the face and neck.

          Heck, one time when I was driving a bully charged my van! I was doing 50km and he charged out, and bashed into my door! I didnt stop, and it didnt seem hurt it just went after the car behind me…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Anyone whos been around a lot of dogs will tell you that small dogs are more bitey.

          There you go, thats exactly the point. But they aren’t killing any babies. Pitbulls were bred for fighting. People have Tigers and Lions as pets too. Is that also justified?

          The fact that a pit bull is stronger and can do more damage is also not the dogs fault.

          Of course it’s not the dog’s fault. It is just an animal. It’s the breeders’ and the owners’ fault. Nobody is advocating for euthanasing Pitbulls. Maybe just get a Golden Retriever if you’re just looking for a pet next time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Nobody is advocating for euthanasing Pitbulls.

            There are a shitload of people who advocate for completely destroying this breed of dog.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Yes, the breed should be distroyed. But not the poor living animals. We should simply stop breeding more of them. Pitbulls are a freak of nature created for the amusement of humans.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                I mean, dog breeding is in general terribly inhumane. All dogs should ideally be mutts. They’d certainly all be healthier and have a better quality of life.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            What do you think happens to all the unadopted pitbulls, pizza parties every Friday? Nope, it’s euthanasia.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The other user who responded to you, @[email protected], does a good job of analyzing the core idea here. To quote Benjamin Disraeli, there’s lies, damn lies, and statistics. Black people are no more “innately inclined towards criminality” than a pit-bull is innately inclined towards mauling people. Where people of color have been historically over policed, profiled by the criminal justice system, and generally set up to have a higher rate of criminal statistics than other ethnic groups, pit-bulls face similar statistical problems. Bite statistics are often self-reported by people who either witnessed a dog attack or who were themselves victims of one. Identifying a dog’s breed by sight, especially for mixed breed dogs, is nearly impossible, and more error prone than accurate. And for a pound, any “big dog with a blocky head” immediately gets labeled as a pit-bull, even if it has literally no pit-bull DNA. These dogs are routinely adopted by people who explicitly train a dog to be mean to people, as opposed to socializing them. The fact that they also have this reputation as guard dogs or attack dogs exacerbates their reputation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I already suggested this in another comment, but you can easily apply a thought experiment here. Magically replace all white people with black people with the same upbringing: does crime go up, down, or basically stay the same? Magically replace all pitbulls with chihuahuas with the same upbringing: do maulings go up, down, or basically stay the same?

          Couldn’t tell the cops if the mugger was white or black? Pretty understandable. Couldn’t tell the cops if the dog that bit you was a chihuahua or a pitbull? Really?

          Any “big dog with a blocky head” should be banned from breeding or sale, and nobody who agrees with that statement cares about DNA. It is a matter of public safety and it doesn’t matter that humans are the real problem, because humans are notoriously hard to control. The pitbulls and similar breeds we have today deserve all the love and comfort we can give them now, but they shouldn’t be bred into the future because there is no legitimate reason to own one except for its potential for violence and flatulence-scapegoating.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Couldn’t tell the cops if the dog that bit you was a chihuahua or a pitbull? Really?

            Because those are the two dog breeds that exist. Pitbull and Chihuahua. There are no others.

    • Ashy
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Everyone knows the FBI is in the pocket of big-chihuahua.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      I don’t hate the breed or agree with breed bans but both my niece and my friend’s daughter were badly bitten by pits and they do make me nervous.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I’m this way with German Shepherd s . I live dogs, Ive had big dogs, I met plenty of friendly Sheperds, but both my mom and I have been bite by 3 different ones (over our lifetimes). Now I am on edge around them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          The one in my neighbourhood jumps all over me. I am also a bit on edge, although most of it seems to be goofiness.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It’s harder to do in some countries, in the Netherlands there’s basically nothing to adopt and there’s plenty free puppies to get that were just randomly born.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            There are many many sheltered dogs in other countries which could be imported by the Netherlands. A lot of German shelters do that and both of my dogs are/were originally from Romania. In that country they have a huge problem with stray dogs and many end up in killing stations. They even have a shelter with about 6000 dogs in it (Smeura, founded by an Austrian woman) and mostly export them to other countries because Romanians don’t seem to care about dogs.

            If anyone wants to adopt a dog from another country I recommend going through local shelters/organizations that already have them imported. There are some sleazy practices going on with people breeding dogs and then selling them as if they were strays. Also you get to meet the dog upfront before making such a big decision.

            • Exocrinous
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Excellent point. The Netherlands is doing some things right, but not everything.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      There are no good dog breeders, or any pet breeders for that matter. In a world where thousands of abandoned pets are put down because there is no room anywhere for them, you have no good justification to purchase a pet from somebody who creates dozens more of them voluntarily to make money.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Tell me you have a pet and not a working animal without telling me you have a pet and not a working animal.

        You’re uninformed. Have a nice day.

        • Lettuce eat lettuce
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago
          1. You were obviously talking about traditional pets, not service animals.

          2. The service animal industry is also largely problematic and exploitative.

          3. Rescue animals can serve as service animals in a large portion of cases anyways, you don’t need “purebreds” to work as herding animals, bomb detection animals, anxiety-comfort pets, guide pets for the blind, etc.

          I know multiple people who have service/working animals and my spouse and I both work in the pet foster community, so no not uninformed.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Obviously. Interesting.

            You’re wrong/have no idea what you’re talking about.

            Have a nice day.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I want a Weiner mixed with Pitbull mixed with Chihuahua dog to herd my cattle. Specifically one that’s been inbred for six years.