Zionists: “We’re not colonizers the Arabs are the real colonizers who genocided us”
Also zionists: "Hey why don’t we colonize a state in the US because there’s ‘uninhabited land’? "
ethnonationalists should all move to Antarctica
The whitest continent
We’ve had first settler-colonial ethnostate, but what about second settler-colonial ethnostate?
New York City?
How would you like a settler colonialist state in your settler colonialist state?
Yo dawg…
Settler-colonial state squared.
Between the Dutch, the English, the French, the Spanish, and the dreaded scourge of
we’re on our fourth or fifth settler state, easy.Elevensies, you say?
A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.
Tagged antisemitism
Yep, it sure is
this has to be some 4chan nazi does this because thsi legit just reads like one of their antisemitic wojak comics
If you take out the nouns it’s really hard to distinguish between zionist and nazi screeds.
Sadly if you look at the comments I don’t think that is the case.
This is just the Libertarian “Free State Project” writ Israeli.
The Mormons will fight you for it
Good for 'em, that’s 2 birds, 1 stone…
These Zionists are taking a page out of the Rajneesh playbook.
settlers actually have only ever had one idea and keep coming up with it again and again.
We should give every ethno nationalist a state. As in one state for all of them. Just Madagascar plan all of these weirdos and come back 5 years later when they’ve all killed each other.
Then we’ll have found the strongest nationalist and we can take our nationalist and pit it against the other nationalists in the international nationalist tournament and regatta.
Gotta keep the nationalists
Waaaaay down in the hole
Somehow it’s Rattata.
This is the 2nd nickel I get to put in my “abrahamic religious group declaring a u.s state as their homeland” jar. Which is weird bc I never thought I’d get to put another.
What we should’ve done in the first place
“We”
American Leftists always transform into wannabe Stalins at Yalta whenever the topic of Israel comes up, determining the best way of how an ethnostate should have been created instead of the way it was IRL.
Really, we’re getting mad at using a generalized “we” in a joke about Germany? Is that really an important issue here?
To be clear, I don’t actually think we should’ve carved an Israel out of Germany either, I just think it would’ve been more appropriate than the actual creation of Israel and drawing a random red line on a map in Germany and writing “Israel” is amusing.
Really, we’re getting mad at using a generalized “we” in a joke about Germany? Is that really an important issue here?
Yes, I’m a party-pooper.
It annoys me because it’s common and the message behind it is “it’s fine if the other side is morally bad enough” as well as the underlying lack of criticism to the concept of nation states. Also, it’s not funny.
Why do we need to criticize the concept of a nation state every time? If the premise is that it will happen regardless, I’m not going to waste my time on that. I would rather suggest an alternative path for the inevitable.
it’s fine if the other side is morally bad enough
Correct
Correct
Moralism is cringe and a bad criteria for whether something should or should not be done.
Why do we need to criticize the concept of a nation state every time?
You say that because you have no problems with nationalism, as long as it’s done by the people you like of course - so much for a stateless, classless society.
Edit: My accusatory tone in the last sentence was kind of pointless. Choosing to support nationalisms around the world because of x and y reason do not mean that you support nationalism in itself, be it from we have to work with what we have/“critical support” angles or genuine approval of nationalism.
Proletarians tending towards nationalism feel like they have a reason for it - be it because they think the world outside the borders is a threat, be it from capitalist competition hurting the local bourgeois, immigrants scary or being targeted for daring to even consider reformist politics. I see it as a bit of a pointless endeavour for communists in the west - to critical support this, critical support that. However, material aid is a different thing - libs’ NGOs spread around their ideology and supporters’ economic interests to all corners of the world from material aid (or promises thereof) to avalanches of propaganda. A communist organization donating to proletarian organizations in need of it (like say medical aid to Cuba) or a union blocking weapons shipment to warzones does work to build a movement, no matter how weak we are atm, without needing to compromise on one’s principles or going “it’s good when they do it”.
Perhaps a bit of gallows humor, but I’m imagining a Gaza Strip but everyone is a cowboy now.
Can someone post the copypasta of the red pill guy talking about taking of new zealand
