So I had a verbal conversation with a coworker yesterday and now I’m getting fed very specific ads. No possible way it’s accidental. I have most of the microphone access to apps limited, I have Google assistant turned off and no VPA setup in my home. I use a Oneplus 9 pro, does anyone have recommendations on how to further root cause this or just par for the course for using any standard android OS? Have other folks had similar experience after locking down their stock phones?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have 0 apps allowed microphone access all the time.

    There is no evidence that phones are snooping on people, but I would say even if unlikely it’s a reasonable concern given what companies do get up to.

    However it is more likely the ads were being served because of all the other data you’re allowing Google to scrape from you all the time rather than the phone mic.

    Rather than focusing on the microphone, look at the bigger picture of how your data is being pillaged by Google all the time.

    For me, I switched away from Gmail, stopped using their search engine, use Firefox and not Chrome, and don’t use their other services where possible. I have android on my phone and use Google maps and Google home. It’s still a huge problem but I use that part of the ecosystem for convenience and no other. Similarly on PC I don’t use Google for anything where I can avoid it, use Firefox containers to keep Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta data as separate as possible, plus I use Linux and VPN as needed, and lots of privacy extensions in Firefox.

    It’s possible to minimise your data exposure to the big tech companies, but difficult to severe completely. You could go even further and switch from android to Graphene OS (I have seriously considered this).

    I would go by the principle of compartmentalising your data as much as possible and limiting access to snooping eyes. The transition can be hard but once you’ve done it you get used to using disparate unnonnected services. Like I really don’t need or benefit from my email data being connected to my data storage or my search engine; it’s a false convenience that benefitted Google only.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Thank you for the super thoughtful response. I’m in the process of fully ditching Windows. I use Vpn whenever I’m not home, I run my own cloud services, last big leap is to switch to graphene when I upgrade my phone and ditch the gmail accounts. I’m close and so finding this shockingly specific article got me thinking. Usually the articles are indeed spot on accurate but expected, not obscure yet specific.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Androids statistically are higher in exploits, if you’re worried about privacy like I was, moving away from google entirely and all their code is probably best

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    It’s more likely that ad networks are showing you ads based on the other person being in vicinity and having things in common. I don’t think voice snooping is the main cause here

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Were both of you connected to the same network at the time you had the conversation? It’s possible your coworker had a lot of search/browsing history of what you were talking about and whoever is pushing the ads figured out you’re likely related to them by way of location/vicinity. I don’t think android is actively listening to your every conversation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    did you or some of the people in your inner circle google whatever you talked about? that is also another way it would have come up in your ads.

  • Richard
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    I bet using an adblock would make it much more difficult for your phone to call home. Try adaway

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I have whole house ad blocking with a pihole and its enforced with pfsense. All DNS traffic gets NATed to pihole.

        • youmaynotknow
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          The inky way you’ll ever remove ads 100% is by moving to a cave with no electricity. We can bring it down to a minimum, but these technics change daily, its impossible to keep up with all of them.

      • zeluko
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        DNS filtering only gets you so far. Its far, but certainly not at the end of the road. More complex and differently designed systems wont be bothered much.
        Encrypted DNS or simply hosting legitimate stuff on the same domain cannot really be fully blocked entirely or make your life difficult.

      • youmaynotknow
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Excellent choice. Check the logs, there’s more than enough evidence in there to shut up some of the creepy big tech defenders in here. I see over 70,000 attempts from my wife’s phone alone trying to hit Samsung, Google or Meta. She doesn’t even have any Meta accounts, but has a Samsung phone, take a hint.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    I had a friend that was convinced that facebook was listening because she was talking about some ice cream and later got an ad for said ice cream.

    Well, of fucking course you got an ad for ice cream. It’s fucking summer, you will get ads for ice cream in the summer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I am using a deGoogled phone and also doing browser separation, I only use google in chromium, never for searching stuff. I was talking about getting an electric toothbrush and my wife googled a big brand to check the price (she does not care about privacy). About 10 minutes later ad blocking was not working for some reason and I starter getting toothbrush ads. I would say it knew somehow that we were in the same household and targeted us both.

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        well you have the exact same public ipv4 address or ipv6 prefix

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Most of these apps are communication apps that need the mic lol, you 100% could have picked better, way more egregious examples.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    Every single example of this happening is anecdotal. The people who tried to properly investigate this have not found it to be true. If you find a video of an actual serious research who proves this is true then I’ll admit that I’m wrong. Otherwise these types of posts are useless

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      A few years ago, I’ve read an article where the journalists investigated this. They asked to Facebook it they actually do it and Facebook confirmed.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      404 Media has been investigating it. They have evidence of companies offering this service, both on their websites and through sources who say they’ve been pitched the product by company representatives. Many questions still remain but I’m not sure this issue can be dismissed as easily as it once was.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Can you summarize their findings? Did they find evidence that this is being done in the wild without opt in or disclosure? Just because it’s possible doesn’t mean it’s being used. Obviously the tech to spy on people via microphone isn’t crazy complicated. The question is whether most apps use it. The amount of data that would be uploaded on people’s data plans would be absurd. I’m very skeptical that this is actually widely used in mainstream apps.

        There have been SO many tests of this and not a single one has showed this actually happening… Just because one single company tried to brag about a tech project to get free PR doesn’t mean this is actually used…

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Just because one single company

          It was more than one company. Please read the article or listen to the podcast. And no, I will not summarise them for you. Stop being lazy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I can’t read the damn articles because the site is paywalled…I much rather read an article than listen to a 45 minute podcast. That is why I asked you to summarize. Thanks for being unhelpful though!

            Also, the podcast stream itself has like 2 minute ads interrupting me every time i skip forwards or backwards. For a source so dedicated to anti-intrusive advertising, it sure as hell is riddled to fuck with intrusive advertisements. Thanks for the amazing source ;-).

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well I just tried it on 3 browsers and 2 mobile browsers and they all say i have to be a paid member to read the articles. I’ll watch the video then but I much rather read.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    The thing with tailored ads is, you’re more predictable than you think you are. Source: am a data scientist (not in advertisement).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    me and a coworker tried an experiment almost ten years ago where we would whisper “breast milk pump” into a phone that had it’s screen locked and everything. About two weeks later started seeing ads for expecting mothers, we are both dudes…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    pinephone has hardware killswitch. but that cant protect you from other devices like other ppl phones.