• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    It’s the rotary shifter knobs and the AC controls buried in touchscreen menus that kill me

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1041 year ago

    It amuses me to no end how here on Lemmy, with our concentration of computer nerd types, absolutely HATES touch screens in cars.

    But to be fair, I think everybody who reviews cars says they hate them too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Because they are stupidly dangerous. The reason physical controls work is because you can memorize where they are and touch them without looking. With the touch screen you have to loo EVERY TIME you want to do anything, and that’s an opportunity to not notice something on the road and end up in an accident.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are so many things that can go wrong with software where in mission critical situations like cars electricity is the preference

      Also tracking comes with that software… nerd types (like me) hate that type of stuff. I think tracking data like that should be banned and is the reason why I won’t buy a new car until that happens

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      I never thought it would bother me, until I actually sat in a car where everything was dependent on software the first time.

      At first I thought I was just getting old. But it dawned on me that relying on software to fucking roll down the windows or starting the car doesn’t feel too good.

      (It was also an extreme jump in technology for me because the last car I drove before that was an old Corsa around the year ~2005.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      As an IT guy I have a case of “familiarity breeds contempt” when it comes to tech. A lot of it feels unnecessary and overcomplicates things and increases the chance of a failure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Time and place. Do I want everything on a touchscreen at home? More compact and allows more options. Yes.

      While I’m trying to fumble for a control when I’m driving a 2000 lb deathtrap at 55 MPH? No.

  • FreshLight
    link
    fedilink
    English
    651 year ago

    100% agreed! I don’t want to take my eyes off the road while driving. Just let me feel for the right button

  • danielfgom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 year ago

    Great news. I wish they would also deduct stars if the heating/cooling controls are not physical too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    The first time I tried using android auto in a rental car I hated it. The damn thing would disconnect constantly and there was no safe way to restart or reconnect it while driving, I had to pull over somewhere. The car’s screen controlled things like the radio and AC so I had to constantly take my eyes off of the road to adjust anything.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    BuT tHeRe Is VoIcE cOnTrOl!!!

    Yes but if I have two friends on board that are talking I won’t say

    “SILENCE EVERYONE! I WILL NOW ATTEMPT TO ENTER THE NAVIGATIOM DESTINATION THREE TIMES WHICH WILL ALL FAIL!”

    And zooming the map on skodas with touch screens is just THE WORST.

  • ???
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    No one ever requested screens instead of buttons. It’s probably some BS some CEO came up with and forced the engineers to implement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    651 year ago

    Personally I think that the following car functions should be mandatory physical controls - wipers, indicators, hazards, side/headlights, door locks, defogger / defroster, electronic parking brake. forward/reverse/neutral/park. And they should be controls that have fixed position in the car (i.e. not on the wheel) with positive and negative feedback.

    And fuck Tesla or any other manufacturer that wants to cheap out on a couple of bucks by removing them. Removing physical controls has obvious safety implications to drivers who are distracted trying to find icons on a tablet.

  • tygerprints
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    I totally agree, anything that takes people’s eyes off the road is not a good choice to put into cars. Cars may have more safety features than ever, but let’s face it, drivers are still too easily distracted and too careless. Here in Utah we have so many highway fatalities every day, people driving the wrong way on freeways, and speeding around school buses with their stop signs out. There’s no good fix for “stupid.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    461 year ago

    I’d rather have a keyboard mounted on the steering wheel and operate the car with bash aliases.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    Not sure how related this is but in my field, designing industrial control systems, each seperate physical button is about $100 added to the cost over a touchscreen. We call touchscreens HMIs just to be special and sound smart. I imagine the numbers are very similar for cars but I don’t have data to back that up.