Concerning

        • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Damn that’s a really good point, why wouldn’t they see swinging as some nightmarish darwinian zero sum game of victory and exclusion, when that’s exactly how their rampant insecurities cause them to perceive everything else? The people making these memes are exactly the type of un-self aware shitty relationship partner who, if their SO did leave them for a third, would absolutely chalk it up to the robust barbarian penis bewitching the weak-willed woman, especially if they were already right wing and predisposed to that kind of narrative.

          Also the phrase penis fascism is now in my thought cabinet

            • keepcarrot [she/her]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              Writing about politicising penis size, while rumours don’t line up with reality, there’s the barbarous big dicks stealing our women with their virile primitive energy, and the cunning small dicks plotting and scheming and being good at maths. It is only us, the middle dicked white men, who can lead the path forward.

              I don’t know how frequently this pops up in history, buy I’ve seen parallels here and there. I also don’t know where Arabs fall into that, since they’re both Asian and barbarous hordes.

      • LeninsBeard [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 year ago

        Yeah that’s what I figured from the “women” part, but the land? I’ve never heard that part

    • mustGo [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 year ago

      I think it’s saying something like:

      Land and women are private property that belong to a collective western civilization which you should identify as, so you can cope with being likely lonely and not having any land. These “things” are being taken from you by black and brown people and refugees, because you aren’t killing them, which makes you pathetic.

  • BeamBrain [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    761 year ago

    Love how they just casually slip in the admission that they think women don’t (or more likely, shouldn’t) have agency.

  • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    671 year ago

    Women: exist to be taken or given away. Totally not a virulent sexist idea that runs parallel to racism 9 out of 10 times.

    I fucking love the “civilization” that elevated this reprobate dumbass to unforetold heights of power and influence. Totally not a futureless dystopia that indicts itself with every molecule of oxygen this lazy apartheid goblin inhales.

  • ComRed2 [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    461 year ago

    I see, I see. And this “land” you speak of, where did you get it from in the first place? thonk

  • Egon [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    541 year ago

    Hard men create good times.
    Good times create soft men.
    Soft men make me hard

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    How often does he tweet? Is there any chance it’s a bot sometimes? Or does he not work or have other hobbies much?

  • Wheaties [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231 year ago

    I’m a little flummoxed as to what event this is supposed to be in reference to. Which country? What land, who are these women?

    What does stand out as clear is that bit at the end. “We’re not [idealized trait] because libs won’t let me be mean!” That’s kinda been the rally cry of yankee conservatives all my life. Terms like ‘thin-skinned’, ‘politically correct’, ‘cuck’, or even ‘woke’; I think they catch on because there’s this contradiction in the hearts of yankee chuds. They’re told, buy culture, by church, by government, by school, You are among the freest people on earth, aren’t you lucky?* Of course, there’s all sorts of structural limitations, but they don’t mind that. Money, markets, property is natural… somehow. They rally against government, because that’s seen as less natural to those other structures (lol), view it as some sort of artificial intervention. But what they get mad at, what a chud’s boils blood, is when they feel like they can’t be mean.

    That is the contradiction: I’m free, so I’m free to be mean. But, other people are also free. Except, they don’t use that freedom to be mean back at me. They say that I shouldn’t say mean things. It makes me feel ashamed. That’s wrong! That’s political correctness gone mad!! The woke mind virus is trying to cuck me!!! When property or money limit freedoms, that’s natural. When government does it, that’s unnatural and tyranny.† When it’s other people… well, that’s just your sense of group dynamics. That’s preinstalled, built in. There’s no human structure more natural than the one inside your head. Conservatives can’t handle that. Can’t cope. Their worldview is the Right one! So if it’s not accepted by polite society, then it must be culture that’s unnatural! Commie-pinko-liberal-hippy Conspiracy!

    Yankee liberals don’t have this problem, but it’s more because they’re just not made to feel ashamed as much, not because they’re any better at processing the feeling. Try as they might, conservatives can’t shame liberals. Communists can however…

    All this is to say, chuds can’t handle when you ask them to be polite.


    Yankee conservatives are actually happy to talk about the overlap of these. When government and private property collude, they call it “corporatism”. To them, it’s bad because it gets in the way of “natural” private property (which is small businesses if the chud is working class, and my business if they aren’t).

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      One thing that libs and chuds have in common is they both believe every single one of their fantasies would instantly become true if their counterpart disappeared. They both think they’d do everything they ever wanted and receive only minimal backlash. They have narrow brains.

      But this is useful though, since it helps them hold on to a status quo. Liberals complained that there were too many conservatives blocking legislation even in 2009 when democrats held the house and senate. All of my conservative family members complained about liberals blocking Trump’s agenda in 2017, even though Republicans held the majority.

  • sovietknuckles [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why, of course I’m voting Bezos in the primary, he’s the only candidate who can stop Musk, the Republican nominee