yes, thats the entire meme.

if your going to tell me to use vlc, you have a point but think of the average user, they are paying for it unironically 😭. just what have we come to…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    there’s “HEVC … from Device Manufacturer” available to download for free if you really need it afaik

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I was able to sideload it using the store app on my old laptop where I got the same pay to install popup. On my newer Framework I noticed that the device manufacturer version was auto-installed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m convinced humanity doesn’t deserve software or computers in general. OP really be complaining about less than 6 quarters…

    • euphoric.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      42
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i use linux - all codecs are already preinstalled there on most distributions, and if not, they are available in the repos for free (like everything else in there). why cant it be included in a $150 os which is owned by a muli billion dollar company? they are just sucking more money out of clueless individuals.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        Nonfree media codecs like HEVC/h265 are affected by US software patents. Distributing them from US servers without paying license fees to MPEG LA can put the host at risk of lawsuit. VLC, deb-multimedia (Debian), and RPM Fusion (Fedora) all avoid that by hosting in France, but even with those sources enabled patent issues can break things like hardware acceleration. Free codecs like AV1/VP9/Opus avoid all these problems.

        Microsoft is US-based and can’t avoid those per-install fees. They could cut the profit from every single Windows license but apparently chose not to.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      So how many lootboxes should I put you down for, 300 or 400? They’re only 99 cents each, so I’ll just put you down for 1,000. After all, you wouldn’t complain about less than 4 quarters, right?

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      341 year ago

      That is a strawman interpretation of OP’s point. In addition to being wrong, the technique is destructive to discussion.

      It is infinitely more constructive (as in, people are more likely to read and care about your opinion) to use “Steel Man”: https://constantrenewal.com/steel-man

      With that, or just with some base level charitable thinking, we could look at OP’s point like this: https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/nickel+and+dime+you

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    851 year ago

    Lots of people shitting on Microsoft on this thread ignoring that it’s not Microsoft who charge for a codec and that Microsoft promote a royalty-free HEVC competitor called AV1.

    Guaranteed this video file is from an Apple device, where patent-encumbered HEVC is the default recording format.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Google Pixel also record in HEVC. The problem with AV1 is that unlike HEVC it wasn’t made to be easily encoded in hardware. Which is probably also the fault of patents, but still…

      • verdare [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        AV1 was designed with hardware decoding in mind. The reason it isn’t as widely supported on hardware is because it was released 5 years after HEVC. It takes a while for new codecs to get hardware support, and even longer for that support to become ubiquitous.

        Also, AV1 has the uphill battle of not being able to use any of the patented technology in HEVC.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah mostly just blame MPEG. They make great tech and then make sure to suck every drop of blood/money out of those who want to use it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Seems like it kinda improved with H.266, but since it’s still not completely royalty-free, fuck that codec lol

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            Yeah I’m hoping the tech consortium that built AV1 continues to push through with new releases, though they’ll be fighting mpeg every step of the way on patents and shit

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly webm is perfectly fine and free. Whenever I’m making something I always use webm and opus and it’s never let me down. Opus is also fucking awesome, unequivocally the best lossy audio codec for any use. Speech and music. Low bitrate and high bitrate (which for Opus is ~160kbps).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Transcoder here, if you’re looking to leverage quality/file size benefits of your codec, you don’t encode with hardware.

        As a rule of fist hardware encoding is better served for streaming purposes where you need to crush a raw 1080p or 1440p stream into something that’s actually a sensible bandwith as fast as possible, especially if you’re streaming 60fps because your algorithm has a time limit of 16ms per frame.

        If file size with preservation of quality is something you care about, you encode as slowly and thouroughly as you can, which is why x264 on your CPU will outperform encoders like NVENC any time.

        When it comes to HEVC, software encoding is only really worth it if you have the time to spare, because x265 takes between 3x and 5x as long as encoding the same footage through x264, with a 15-20% smaller file size at best. It is also more intensive to decode, which is why you still see many files with a H.264 codec.

      • OsaErisXero
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Wouldn’t it be the chipset vendors who would implement AV1 (or any other codec) in hardware?

  • sverit
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    Blame the video creator for using a non free codec.

    • euphoric.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      381 year ago

      i mean pirating would be a lot more relevant i guess, assuming the companys are just as big of dicks

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        55
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pirating doesnt really exist without foss tho does it? All the tools, even just for dvd ripping could never exist the same way as closed source software.

      • riwo
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        have fun pirating stuff with your subscription based torrent client, that communicates home and whose operators know your payment information ;w;

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          You joke, but it really exists: the company that acquired uTorrent 17 years ago now sells an ad-free version of their current torrent client as “BitTorrent Pro” for USD$20/year, or alternatively as part of a VPN service bundle for $70/year.

          Needless to say, stick with FOSS clients like qBittorrent/Deluge/etc instead.