The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. It must also set aside $1.5 million to help the immigrant minors who were illegally employed.

Immigrant children as young as 14 were found working illegally amid dangerous heavy equipment at a Tennessee firm that makes parts for lawn mowers sold by John Deere and other companies, according to Labor Department officials.

The company, Tuff Torq, was fined nearly $300,000 for hiring 10 children. As part of a consent agreement with the federal government, the company is also required to set aside $1.5 million to help the children who were illegally employed. Ryan Pott, general counsel for Tuff Torq’s majority owner, the Japanese firm Yanmar, acknowledged the violations to NBC News.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    they lied about their age… the corporation’s HR dept really screwed the pooch but it’s probably difficult to perform background checks on people who are illegally entering the country.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Well to work with heavy machinery, you have to be 18. You’ve clearly never met a 14 year old, but 4 years and puberty at that age make a BIG difference. These children were very obviously, well, children.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        I’ve seen people over 18 work on heavy machinery who I wouldn’t consider mature enough to do so. The older you get the more you cringe when you see someone work and know they’re gonna get hurt before they have a chance to live.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      it’s probably difficult to perform background checks on people who are illegally entering the country.

      So the default is to just hire a literal child and hope for the best? Do you not see how stupid that is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      Oh but c’mon, it’s a country where undiagnosed schizophrenics have the freedom to buy semi-automatic firearms, proudly rapist lying bankrupt fraudsters can become the president and guns are the leading cause of death for children!

      What’s not to like?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Listen, we can’t all live in Finland, mate. This is just rubbing it in. And you over there with your tall treetops and loffy mountains.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1571 year ago

      The company is being fined, so no single person is being held accountable monetarily either

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        2191 year ago

        Google tells me:

        Tuff Torq has 513 employees, and the revenue per employee ratio is $311,891. Tuff Torq peak revenue was $160.0M in 2023.

        They were fined $300,000. So less than one employees’ worth of revenue.

        Cost of doing business, as usual.

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          82
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fined $300K, but also have to give up $1.5M in profit for the 10 kids. $150,000 per kid, or, you know, 1/2 of the revenue they generated. ;)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            They would actually just hire adults, who cost slightly more if they are desperate. They will continue production at 100%

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            501 year ago

            Well I’m sure a company with ethics, like John Deere probably, will stop doing business with Tuff Torq now. Definitely.

            • @[email protected]M
              link
              fedilink
              421 year ago

              No, they’ll just re-negotiate their contract to get a better deal causing Tuff Torque to treat their remaining employees worse.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              Honestly, they probably will. John Deere is really shitty ethically speaking with their stance on right to repair but they have a very strict supplier code of conduct. I used to work for a place that was one of their suppliers and our contract with them was far more strict than with any of our other customers. It mostly included things focused on employee welfare at the suppliers site. I’m going to see if I can get a hold of it today but posting it would probably violate confidentiality and this is an easily doxable account so don’t expect me to post it wholesale.

              Also this place just got a bunch of bad press while being associated with Deere while Deere currently has enough bad press of their own. They’re going to come down on them hard which almost certainly means just cutting them off because it isn’t like a company as big as Deere is going to struggle to find eager suppliers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Could you explain what exactly “revenue per employee ratio” means? My thought would be that this is the value the average employee creates for the company minus the cost of employment per year, is that correct?

          • Enkrod
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            It’s just revenue divided by number of employees

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Revenue is all the money the company makes, before any costs

            Revenue per employee is that amount divided by the number of employee

            The after costs amount would be profit per employee

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        451 year ago

        Whoever signed off on hiring literal children should be held accountable. Actually holding these people to accountability is the only way this is getting solved

  • @[email protected]M
    link
    fedilink
    791 year ago

    “The Labor Department has prioritized child labor enforcement since last spring amid a 152% increase in children found to be illegally employed since 2018, according to department figures.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Of course they are. Why else would you oppose immigration, except to be able to exploit illegal immigrants?

          By virtue of being here unlawfully, they have little recourse. That fact alone is essentially leverage for any “employer” to exploit them over.

          It’s clearly not because they are a drain on the system, because that’s been disproven time and time again. Their economic contributions far outweigh whatever little social programs they’re able to obtain.

          So it must be because they are a great pool of cheap, under-the-table, sub-minimum-wage, exploitable labor. Just like prisoners and prostitutes (except for the sans sub-minimum wage part. Plenty of illicit sex workers that are unpaid victims of trafficking, but if the John is paying less than $7.25 an hour, they should really know better)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            By virtue of being here unlawfully, they have little recourse. That fact alone is essentially leverage for any “employer” to exploit them over.

            Ah yes, keep your employees at least as culpable as yourself, and thus exploitable. These are mob tactics. Hey, maybe slapping these monsters with a RICO suit is the way to go here?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Mobsters didn’t have Citizens United.

              If CU were around in the 1920s, we’d still be in prohibition.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            Why else would you oppose immigration, except to be able to exploit illegal immigrants?

            Bigotry for one. You should talk to my father, since you know I don’t talk to him, he ran for town mayor on a campaign to get rid of Latinos by changing zoning laws forbidding multifamily residential units. He didn’t win and I am glad I wasnt 18 since it would have been awkward voting against him.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        Indeed, and this is what the vast majority of human trafficking actually is. But you may have noticed that very few conservatives are calling for the blood of these factory owners.

  • t�m
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    yet we have freedom and China doesn’t /s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    Are you from Tennessee? 'Cause you’re the only ten-year-old I see working on this assembly line.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    361 year ago

    I’m sure Tennessee law makers will be sure to rectify this soon - they’ll go ahead and loosen child labor laws more and more so their benefactors remain happy.

  • mechoman444
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    So I was a teenager in the early 2000s and many, many of my teenage classmates including myself had jobs. Some full time some part time.

    Personally I worked at a paper mill from the age of 15 until I moved out of state.

    But the minimum age was 14 to be able to work at that time.

    I’ve just been seeing a lot of posts like this indicating young teenage children working and I don’t see why this is all of the sudden an issue?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Different states have different laws but generally there are strict limitations on the types of jobs that a person under 18 is allowed to work. It used to be really popular for manufacturing companies to hire kids because they are small and can fit into tight spaces in the heavy equipment. Plus they were considered expendable.

      There are also tight regulations on the hours they can work. Because those children are supposed to be attending school. In all of the cases I’ve seen recently the kids are illegal immigrants who are not in school at all. They’re just working full time jobs with extremely dangerous machinery in violation of pretty much every regulation around child employment. So yes it’s a problem.

      • mechoman444
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I see. Then I agree. That is something that should not be happening. Exploiting children of migrant families is despicable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      And you had all the protections afforded a citizen. You could speak up and not worry about deportation. If they didn’t pay you, you had recourse. These people don’t. So don’t kid yourself when you think you’ve worked similar conditions.

      • mechoman444
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Deportation the hell are you talking about?

        If the company is hiring illegal underage immigrants they themselves are breaking the law.

        Moreover even though they might be illegal underage immigrants they still have protections under us law child labor laws don’t change due to your status as an individual in the United States.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          And the fine they got was less than the revenue generated by one of those children.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Yeah, that’s kinda why the company is getting fined. For the crimes.

          Companies like this operate like an umbrella and hide people from the protections our laws offer them, frequently holding leverage over workers in ways that cross international boundaries.

          People aren’t getting work visas to do grunt work in manufacturing or meat slaughter houses. This is America. No one needs a temp service to hire teenagers if you’re doing things legally in those industries.

          There’s a reason this company used a hiring service, you see it in every industry that needs hard labor in this country. Its the elephant in the room. Wake up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Times change. I was running a forklift at 14 and working construction at 16. Society has decided that it isn’t the way it wants things to happen anymore.

      I imagine you are reading more stories because the economic downturn has pushed more families to do this.

      • mechoman444
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I guess the point I’m trying to make is that teenagers have always been working this isn’t a new phenomenon that has just now started to happen regardless of how many teenagers are working even if that number has increased.

        I’ve seen some legislation in recent years where they dropped the minimum wage to work down which I don’t agree with but other than that where’s the problem here that’s what I’m asking?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          have always been working this isn’t a new phenomenon that has just now started to happen regardless of how many teenagers are working even if that number has increased.

          Moral ought from an is

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I guess the point I’m trying to make is that teenagers have always been working this isn’t a new phenomeno

          “People have always kept slaves, so there’s nothing wrong with slavery.” The sentiment of people like you a couple of hundred years ago.

          • mechoman444
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Ever heard of a false equivalency? Because your above statement is a text book definition.

            Also go fuck yourself for inferring that I somehow support slavery and for comparing legally employing teenagers and compensating them for their labor to buying, selling and torturing human beings and making them work for free.

            (I understand that the company in the post was illegally employing underage migrants. I’m making a general statement concerning the entire teenage work force in American.)

            There’s nothing wrong with employing teens within a set of standards and reason.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      Do you mean you don’t think it’s a problem at all? Or you’re angry that it’s only just become an issue?

      • mechoman444
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Employing illegal underage migrant workers is definitely a problem and needs to be addressed.

        And I’m not angry not sure why you interpreted my comment in that capacity.

        I simply posed a question why employing teenagers has suddenly become an issue. Apparently people found my question offensive and assumed a position that I don’t hold.

        My question wasn’t directly commenting on the article cited in this post but was in general since I have seen multiple posts indicating that more companies are employing more teenage workers not necessarily illegal migrant workers.

        My question is why is this suddenly a problem since employing teenagers has been something that has been going on in this country since its conception.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      You ever seen a kid get killed in heavy machinery? Have you ever seen a kid get permanently maimed on heavy machinery? That shit changes you. As a society we’re all supposed to learn from those horrors but instead we stay real myopic and say I’ve never been hurt, I’ve never seen anything bad happen and ignore that all regulations were written in blood and lifelong trauma. Then there’s the myriad situations where migrant children can be abused because they’re low risk victims.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Right! This seems to be the prevailing missing puzzle piece to most of these people’s thought process. They’re skipping over the fact that CHILDREN are WORKING instead of, oh I don’t fucking know, BEING CHILDREN?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Right now 14 year olds just look at phones and go on social media which is a direct harm. Working would be more healthy for their body and their mind.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Yes, getting caught in a large factory machine and being ground up and spat out into a puddle of mush would be much more healthy for their body and their mind.

            • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              we’re exploited enough as is and corporate greed is only getting worse, there’s absolutely zero need to put children in a position to be exploited.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  What the fuck? You think employees should be exploited because they need money to survive? Force them to work 80-hour weeks for minimum wage? Scream racist epithets at them if they aren’t productive enough? How about beat them with a metal rod if they step out of line?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    Imagine how insanely productive kids must be at repetitive tasks. And it’s not like they have been exposed to the labour struggles, they’ll have to figure it out all of that on their own.

    • @[email protected]M
      link
      fedilink
      451 year ago

      Yup. Republicans claim they want to close the border, but have no problem exploiting the labor supply.