• SSUPII
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    I want Doom running on a Neuralink outputting the game directly in your eyes

    • @phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      I have played one game of Civ in my life. After spending the better part of a weekend with it, I realized the “one more turn” thing was too addictive for me and decided it was best if I never play the game again.

      • @Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I hurt my finger from clicking so much once night and haven’t been willing to go back. It was a bit too addictive, but ngl, playing it with just my brain sounds interesting. I’m just left thinking, what’s the catch? What “ergo” issues might come up from using this thing for hours to do something repetitive? None? Big, if true

        • Three was an interview/presentation at neuralink where people asked him some questions.

          Someone asked him what it felt like to use it, and he tried to explain, but it came down to it was too complicated to fully explain it.

          Asking him if it caused any sort of fatigue would have been a amazing question.

    • UnfortunateShort
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      And then the realization hits that you’re at turn 200 and it takes like half an hour

  • @redeyejedi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    881 year ago

    I think it’s an amazing advancement and that’s awesome for a quadriplegic person to interact with the world.

    The part that I haven’t heard anyone mention is what is the life cycle of these chips. Computers and cell phones all become outdated so quickly. Are recipients guaranteed upgraded chips as they become available?

    I was reading an article recently about people who have had implants in their eyes that help them to see become obsolete. One because the company stopped supporting the specific version that was in the patient. The other because the company had gone out of business.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I suppose the counter argument is people don’t ask that kind of question when they get a pacemaker. At some point you have to get an implant if you need an implant you can’t go oh well our weight six months because then version 2.0 is out

    • @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Many have mentioned that so you didn’t look very far then. It’s like the first thing people wonder. They have no answer of course, this is research and not a product

    • @kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      501 year ago

      Even if the chip never went obsolete, the scar tissue build up around implanted brain devices interferes with signal over time and they need to be replaced.

      Also, each installation/replacement has a few percentage point chance of leading to a life threatening infection.

      Unless both those issues are solved, irrespective of obsolescence this is only the sort of thing that makes sense for patients who feel that their life is effectively over without it and have low risk thresholds for treatment options.

    • Part of the study is to see how long it lasts. It’s replaceable in theory but there’s things like are there complications with redoing it (e.g scar tissue) to be explored.

      As a human trial, he may never get an upgrade, and it might fail in a few months unexpectedly.

      It’s part of the risk of being in a trial vs waiting until it’s a finished product.

    • @dexa_scantron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      This tech is extremely experimental and nowhere near ready to market as a consumer device that a regular person can purchase, so a lot of those questions don’t really have answers.

    • @Guntrigger@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Ever seen Johnny Mnemonic? He had a whole 80gb storage in his brain and upgraded it to 160gb. Future proof. He’d almost be able to install a modern AAA title!

  • BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    But… Did he play it better?

    I was just thinking about this game and how it took so long to play.

  • @SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    571 year ago

    The start of the article is confusing. Given what it tells us that the patient has been doing, it sounds like the chip only acts as a receptor of the brain’s outputs, this is, the chip should act on the brain as little as possible. However,

    The billionaire also hinted at the time that the implant was functioning well and had detected a “promising neuron spike”.

    Which makes it sound like the very opposite. Honestly it wouldn’t surprise me if Elon had no goddamn idea about what the implant does yet rushed to comment on it anyway.

    • @KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      He uses those words as buzzwords, having no real clue about the correct terms are.

      But obviously looks like they do aim to “interface”, not just interpret, eeg already can do that from outside the brain

    • @Cyyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      for me it just sounds like the chip is receiving signals from neurons and the “spike” is basically a signal.

      short: the chips works well in receiving signals and you can control the mouse by that. so nothing sending hut just receiving and getting a clear signal.

    • @root_beer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I would never have assumed he had a clue what was happening in the first place. What role, apart from money, does the Boer even play in this thing?

  • @Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    This is your scheduled reminder that Musk’s companies have a history of faking test footage and results on his direction.

  • @M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1101 year ago

    My only concern is that people are going to think that he only stayed playing civ all night because it’s exciting to do something. But that’s not the case.

    Innocent people are going to try this game and keep saying “one more turn”.

    • Sippy Cup
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      You almost need to pick your victory condition at the start and focus everything on that, and what you can’t focus on that win condition you focus on denying the win for someone else, whoever happens to be winning by that point. Generally the same will be over before you get to the modern era.

      Religion and war are the sloggiest.

      • @Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Culture victory is almost impossible without mods. Even if you get past how cryptic it is, other civs basically have free reign to stall you if they focus at all on culture.

        Funny thing is though, I got a culture victory as Gilgamesh… because I nuked Greece. I was going for war victory so it was really funny to launch a nuke at the greek capital then suddenly jump to the culture victory cutscene.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    I don’t know why, I have zero reason to even think this. Maybe it’s my growing distaste for Musk and his bullshit. But something about this whole thing has my “press X to doubt” meter going off the charts.

    If I’m wrong. Great. But something in my gut tells me that you don’t just go from multiple dead test subjects and a steven king novel’s worth of FDA investigations, to suddenly having someone using it perfectly fine with no side effects.

    Again, this is all allegedly. I have no proof or evidence either way. It’s just my own gut. So don’t sue me, Elon.

    • @zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      you don’t just go from multiple dead test subjects and a steven king novel’s worth of FDA investigations, to suddenly having someone using it perfectly fine with no side effects

      What this article doesn’t tell you is that before neuralink, this patient absolutely hated turn-based strategy games. But now the only thing they can do is play Civ 6. Day or night, doesn’t matter, Civ 6 is the only thing in their brain. Just one more turn. Just one… more… turn…

    • @Emmy@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      We’ve been able to do this for years. The difficult part has been making it cheap, reliable and non-invasive. Electrodes in the brain degrade neural tissue and… There’s good reason this isn’t done on the regular.

    • Chaotic Entropy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Why? Because time and time again it has been shown that Musk’s big bold ideas are shaky prototypes based on lies that just blagged it long enough for him to find someone who could kind of make something work. It’s a complete coin toss as to whether it actually works out or not, but it will be despite Musk not because of him.

    • @Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      You’re right to be sceptical, considering Musk’s other company - Tesla - faked self-driving footage on his direction. The videos were just straight up edited to generate hype while in reality the product was still failing during internal testing.