• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    601 year ago

    implementation which works 99.99% of the time

    Republicans: “It’s broken and bad”

    stand for nothing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    Flip the script around, and what this tells us is that within the very narrow path of totality, 30 gigawatts of solar power is produced within minutes. That’s a decent amount of power, very quickly, for basically free. Plus all the other solar power still being produced outside the area in totality.

    Gets even more ridiculous when you factor in all the solar power that will be produced within just that same path by time the next eclipse hits us in 20 years. If a couple minutes of losing sunlight is 30 gigawatts, 20 years of having sunlight is multiple millions of gigawatts produced. I think we can just scrape the lost 30 off the top of those millions and call it good.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Perhaps someone should tell this dickhead about all of the land the US will lose due to carbon emissions from coal power. Or maybe mention the continuing increase in business insurance due to the same thing. If we are going to point out the adverse effects of solar we should point out the adverse affects of coal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Also the incredibly long supply lines that go to fossil fuel plants. Solar panels aren’t as green as we like to think, but they’re rugged as fuck and require 0 infrastructure to produce power. Most of the maintenance is wiping them with a damp sponge¹, and (these ghouls should love this part) zero non-maintenance labor to operate, no moving parts, and they work best during peak demand times, right? If I were powering my Last Redoubt, solar would be up there on my list of options until the sun dies.

      ¹i know, hyperbole, but not much of it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Why wouldn’t it be? They already took the subsidy and got the green washing. They can switch back to the grid and move it to the expense line on the P&L. And sell the hardware to recoup the difference in cost the subsidy didn’t cover.

        You can’t just wait for government funds to come to you. You have to take it before your competition does. And if you exhaust the funds before they or anyone else can take advantage, you look better to the market. Stock price go up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wait until this moron finds out how many GiGaWaTts we will lose after sunset

    What a Gigatwat

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      When there is only 50% totality, photovoltaic also makes 50% less. You just do not notice it when looking around, because your eyes adjust to the changed brightness. So a photovoltaic produces less for a longer time. What I found, for the 2017 eclipse, was that around 16GW were impacted with at most a reduction of 5GW in one moment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      He may be counting the 1 kW per square metre of sunlight that reaches the ground, not just the fraction we turn to electricity

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I suspect if you went through his history he has already told us that solar is useless because of night, and that wind is useless because sometimes it’s still

  • /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    36
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wind energy? Hydro energy? Nuclear energy? There’s like more ways to get energy.

    I also don’t know if this guy is pointing out that the sun gives us so much energy, so we should use it more or that the sun could be covered sometimes rendering it useless.

    • Ech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Definitely the latter. His bad faith argument is meant to discredit an alternative energy source.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    321 year ago

    Sigh… Same energy as the following:

    We lost all that sunlight. Add this to the long list of reasons why “farming” food is unreliable.

  • DumbAceDragon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Another way to look at this: The solar infrastructure that is affected by the eclipse alone can generate roughly 30 GW

    • Atelopus-zeteki
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      On the vast majority of days, as compared to these particular 3 minutes of Solar Eclipse.