For me it’s Open Source AGI not controlled by the enshittifying power of capital

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      He said “technological” advancement, not “political”. I think the greed and slow politics is what is holding us back here, not technology.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    • Find proof of extraterrestrial life
    • Find out what causes gravity and learn to use it (just imagine a world in which we could create gravity)
    • Master matter and build Replicators
    • Get a grasp of what time is and why we don’t have a real perception of it
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    devils advocate: if the technology is not […or quickly become] affordable. then sometimes, some of these hopes, are unrealistic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    Room temperature superconductors. Not for any of the particular uses per se, but just because the world would go nuts and it would be interesting to see.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Flexible, plug-n-play solar energy capture methods with more versatile applications than inside aluminum frames glued to huge hunks of glass.

    Like, a paint. I could just paint the south side of my house with the stuff and it handles my electricity demand.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    First colony in space.

    we’ve all got a finite time and my dream is that mankind figures out how to spread throughout the stars.

    a first colony is that step

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Fully augmented reality. Travel anywhere you can read the signs, and understand the language through subtitles and or earbuds.

    Non-fixed precision robotics. Basically give a pair of robot arms a piece of wood and a dremel and it can make whatever shape, but for any tool/material.

    A decentralized currency that is actually useful as currency.

    A rental car that picks me up at the airport, and that I can just abandon when I’m done. I don’t mind driving I just don’t want to bother with the shuttles and parking.

    Food delivery drones owned by the restaurant.

    Cellular data everywhere (like starlink is working on). Ability to order an air drop of like 10 kg of food/supplies anywhere within ~200 miles of a city.

  • SavvyWolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    531 year ago

    I’d like to see fusion power (or some other good power source) become a thing. It’d be nice to live in a society where energy usage was basically safe and free.

    If we’re being unrealistic, easy access to ftl spacecraft for everyone would be nice. Exploring the galaxy sounds fun.

    • Cruxifux
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Sure it’ll be safe, but free is a pipe dream under our current system

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What’s funny is that we DO have access to fairly clean energy already! Nuclear and renewables (not as much solar, until we solve the rare earth metals problem) are pretty darn clean. I mean… have you looked up Thoroum reactors? Those things are really neat, much safer and better for the environment, etc., but came just a bit too late combined with the nuclear scare.

        • gregorum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, that was mostly right— until we actually built one. Now we’ve built 3 fusion reactors. It’s no longer theoretical.

          Now comes the phase of overcoming certain limitations wrt scaling up the tech to make commercially-viable reactors, and estimating that at about another 15-20 years (considering the rapid advances of the last few years) isn’t unrealistic.

          Before it was a question of, “can we even do this?” We’re finally past that milestone. Now it just a matter of the very achievable goal of scaling up the reactors. The timeline for that is much more predictable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            Those scaling issues have always been the issues. We’ve had working reactors for over 65 years.

            “The first experiment to achieve controlled thermonuclear fusion was accomplished using Scylla at LANL in 1958.”

            And don’t think that the NIF ignition results are the kind of breakthrough that headlines make it out to be - that project is weapons research, and is not designed to produce power, nor is it anywhere close to doing so when the power to the lasers is measured and not just what the pellet absorbs.

            However, what’s new in the last few years is commercial investment in fusion, and I do think that it will make the difference that the last 65 years haven’t. Maybe even in the next 20 years™

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                You’ve been taken in by intentionally deceptive headlines.
                The energy absorbed by the pellet (what they are measuring as the “input”) is something like 1/20th or worse of the energy used to power the lasers. The output is greater than that “input” by a little, but again, nowhere near the actual energy used, and it won’t ever be at that experiment because it’s not designed for it, it’s designed so we can simulate H-bombs without setting off real ones.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            The next major goal is still overall energy-positive output, right? We’ve only breached the threshold of output > input naively, without considering any external energy costs. I hope we get there though, it would be very neat!

            • gregorum
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Oh, no, we’ve managed net positive! That was the most critical achievement, and we finally did it last year! Not a whole lot, but we have. The problems we’re encountering now is dealing with the massive heat produced. But we just hit a new milestone in dealing with that, too!

              Progress is being made, and that’s (the heat) is one of the biggest factors now in scaling up. But it’s an achievable goal. The more heat we can handle during the reaction, the bigger reactors we can build.