What is it with Nike and sexualized athletic uniforms these days (see MBA see-through pants)? Did PornHub invest without anyone noticing?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I glad to hear the use of the scientifically accurate term “Hoo Haa” to describe the aforementioned thingy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1231 year ago

    Maybe my ad blocker is working double time but how is there not a picture of the proposed outfit in the article?!?

    Here you go

    • strawberry
      link
      fedilink
      951 year ago

      fuck is that supposed to cover? half a coochie lol. one misstep and the cats out of the bag lol

        • strawberry
          link
          fedilink
          151 year ago

          mate what do h think it means? not sure were on the same page here

        • Clay_pidgin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          231 year ago

          It means to say something that can’t be unsaid, usually in the context of blabbing a secret. The origin is from the British Royal Navy in the age of sail. The “cat” is a Cat’o’ nine-tails a type of whip used for punishment. It was stored in a velvet bag, and once it came out there was no going back, it was going to be used on you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        551 year ago

        The deviant in me likes it, but man I don’t think women should have to wear stuff like this to work if they don’t want to.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t know how to be completely proper without diminishing the meaning of my statement all the time, but I agree with this statement’s substance and structure. I hope people can take comments like this without feeling degraded.

          Nobody should be forced to wear a uniform that diminishes their hard work and achievements that earned them the required uniform. Olympians are going to want high performance garb - generally tight-fitting and light weight. That doesn’t mean the team organizers should go hog wild on showing skin to boost ratings. It’s impressive, inspiring, and (for me) a bit depressing to see the peak human form without being creepy, but these folks have worked far too hard to be objectified.

          But if they’re down, I’m down

          *Edited afterthought: Do NCAA gymnasts have uniform issues? I don’t see their competitions often, but they tend to stay in place to my knowledge. I’m not trying to argue for the new uniforms - it just seems like those uniforms would be a relevant case study.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      That is absolutely degrading, why is it impossible to give women similar kinds of shorts as men gets?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Women’s butt muscles move differently than men’s do. So they need a higher cut to compensate for that.

        ;p

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure women’s anatomy is slightly different, but there are other ways to deal with that other than to just give them one tiny crotch strap.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is a shorts option for women as well, you can see it on the far right in the picture in the article.

        Sucks for women who do usually like wearing briefs but they aren’t being forced to wear this.

    • dditty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I am pretty aghast at how revealing that track outfit is. It’s already bad enough how short women’s running shorts are compared to mens; if you have even slightly thicker thighs they can chafe pretty badly!

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      571 year ago

      So the tops are nearly identical. But women clearly need massive lower ventilation…or something.

      Yeah this just shows Nike is being sexist as fuck. Swap these suits by gender and let’s see what happens.

  • JoYo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    why wouldn’t they use the other kits that aren’t skimpy? there’s all the rest of them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I hear Nike calls this their emperor line. They told the athletes it’s ultra lightweight performance wear. It doesn’t actually exist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Hey, some of us are only tolerant of degredation! /s

        Though really, my only problem is this isn’t what the athletes want (well, and the slew of other peoblems this situation is indicative of). I think it’d be hilarious if athletes could go traditional all the way to the nude. No sharkskin swimming suits, no state of the art track shoes, nada.

        Maybe then they’d stop breaking records every year just for getting technological assistance…

        Then we can make an “enhanced” Olympics with steroids and fancy suits and the works, and REALLY see what humans can do on their own with the juxtaposition.

  • Atelopus-zeteki
    link
    fedilink
    1171 year ago

    Not as much fun as the title, and more to the point: Lauren Fleshman, the US national champion in the 5000m in 2006 and 2010, shared even harsher criticism in an Instagram post, writing: “I’m sorry, but show me one WNBA or NWSL team who would enthusiastically support this kit. This is for Olympic Track and Field. Professional athletes should be able to compete without dedicating brain space to constant pube vigilance or the mental gymnastics of having every vulnerable piece of your body on display. Women’s kits should be in service to performance, mentally and physically. If this outfit was truly beneficial to physical performance, men would wear it.” She added: “This is not an elite athletic kit for track and field. This is a costume born of patriarchal forces that are no longer welcome or needed to get eyes on women’s sports. … Stop making it harder for half the population @nike @teamusa @usatf.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    Great, now viewing the Olympics will be banned in Texas with the governor’s war on porn with “christian” values.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can they wear some sort of bike shorts or compression shorts/half tights under it?

    That would at least cover their hoo haa properly…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      They can and theres is also a shorts option for women as well, you can see it on the far right in the picture in the article.

  • dohpaz42
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    They do it because ultimately, they get away with it. I understand athletes have worked their asses off to get to compete (especially in the Olympics), but at some point if they genuinely want change, they need to take a stand — either wear something less revealing, or boycott their events. Get enough people to do it, and maybe it’ll send the message.