• TimeSquirrel
      link
      fedilink
      37
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Me, an American, to my German cousin:

      “So, yeah, I’m changing email addresses, here’s my new one.”

      “Email? Are you using WhatsApp?”

      “Er, no, how about text?”

      “We all have WhatsApp.”

      “Okay, maybe Google Chat?”

      “WhatsApp? WhatsApp.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Here’s the trick (maybe): “Don’t you know that WhatsApp is owned by Meta and collecting information on your chat metadata (who you chat to, when, your contacts, their contacts).”

        Tell them to get Signal. If there’s any country on this planet where convincing people to use Signal is easier, it must be Germany. GMaps streetview was banned there until recently, everyone uses fake names on Facebook, if they even made one in the first place.

        Surely they must be amenable to Signal

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 months ago

        I’ve had basically the same conversation with my sister who lives in Albania. I just want to use something encrypted like signal but she just refuses and says it’s either WhatsApp or Facebook messenger. Cause of that I barely talk to her.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    597 months ago

    If they said or implied anything else, they would lose all leverage. The public couldn’t care less about who owns tiktok, so they need people to think they’ll lose it to have any public support.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 months ago

    while i’m obviously sure it’s a bluff, pulling out instead of selling would be the clearest admittance that tiktok is (or at that point: was) not about the profit, but about Chinese influence in the US. the message being “we rather leave a hudred billion dollars on the table than give away our surveillance technology to some US company.”

    but yeah, they will def. sell if they need to.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      It’s more like their US profits are no match for their Chinese profits. Social media use in China and other Asian countries dwarfs US use.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 months ago

      There are valid commercial reasons not to go through a forced sale with a ticking time limit, which will inevitably carry a steeply discounted price. Rather than getting robbed, it makes sense to hang on to the company and take profits from the rest of the world.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
    link
    fedilink
    English
    237 months ago

    If the Chinese government is behind this, it’s a great play. Having Joe Biden be “the guy who banned tik tok” would severely undermine his election chances.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    46
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    US should call their bluff. If Tiktok gets banned, people will complain for a little bit until people forget and move on to what’s next. Why doesn’t an American company make something that’s practically identical? People will be all desperate for their 5 second dopamine rush that they will download anything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87 months ago

      They can’t, the algorithm is the best part about tiktok and none of the competitors come close.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          If you have to ask that question you definitely don’t use Tiktok it’s far far superior algorithmically than Reels and YT Shorts which are both absolute garbage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          107 months ago

          If I remember correctly from my rabbit hole, it tracks your viewing habits by a far wider list of variables and on a micromanaged scale. It can be annoying if you have someone sending you content you don’t like because viewing them will slot them into your feed immediately, but it’s just as quick to discard those things. I found it very easy to train for my interests in cooking, goblincore, and irrational humor.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              Personally I’ve not tried shorts, I don’t have any issues with it but I’ve only ever used YouTube for long form educational videos or horror fiction so it never has anything to offer me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      YouTube and Instagram already have identical features. Most US creators who post on Tik Tok also use those platforms already

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      187 months ago

      India did this and Instagram reels is the main one that benefited. Probably be the same for US if it pulls through on this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    187 months ago

    Y’all are dumb as hell for supporting this bill. It doesn’t just ban tiktok, it applies to any app with 20% or more ownership by any person/entity from a country that is a “foreign adversary”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Im not making a stance on it but I read more to it.

      It seems very focused on “social media” as in software that is about users sharing their own content with other users with 1,000,000 monthly active users.

      Those that support it on tiktok likely would for other similar services.

      The part that stands out to me is it mentions real time communication. So Telegram probably counts.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      A lot of the users here are just butthurt anti social media people, not actually principled free speech or rule of law advocates. This ban is arguably unconstitutional and TikTok is being targeted for purely political reasons, not because of any credible threat to “national security.” This is some Patriot Act level overreach bullshit, but the clueless mainstream just clamors for it because CNN/Fox spends hours of airtime decrying the dangers of TikTok, and a fraction doing the same for Meta/X/Reddit.

      • impure9435
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        TikTok is literally controlled directly by the Chinese government, which is officially considered a foreign adversary (for a good reason)

          • impure9435
            link
            fedilink
            37 months ago

            There are more than enough sources, just google “TikTok Chinese government influence”. Just a few examples:

            https://www.forbes.com/sites/iainmartin/2023/07/26/tiktok-chinese-propaganda-ads-europe/

            https://www.axios.com/2024/03/11/tiktok-china-us-elections-influence

            https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/11/china-is-using-tiktok-for-influence-campaigns-odni-says-00146336

            Also, just think about it: The CCP loves spreading propaganda. There’s a massive social media platform controlled by China, which is used by young people in foreign adversary nations. Why wouldn’t they leverage this platform to spread their lies and influence people? It’s literally the perfect opportunity.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              57 months ago

              That’s all platform agnostic. You think they didn’t have accounts and ads on every major service?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Wow. How predictable. Nothing you posted has anything to do with the Chinese government “literally directly controlling” TikTok, despite those being the exact words you chose and used.

              Instead, you posted one story about TikTok in Europe running ads by the CCP, and two about the CCP using accounts on TikTok.

              It’s a well known fact that the CCP runs accounts on Reddit and other socials. TikTok accepting and running ads from the CCP in Europe is a European problem. Could be addressed by updated regulations around ads, idk, I’m not European. Meta could run ads from the CCP or Russia in Europe, perhaps? Or maybe TikTok broke European advertising regulations. Still, has nothing to do with the USA.

              So again, you people are repeating US intelligence propaganda about the Chinese government “owning and controlling” TikTok and then posting “proof” that proves nothing.

              Try again?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                47 months ago

                It’s painfully apparent you have a fundamental lack of understanding of how the CCP works in relation to companies in China. Or how they behave on the world stage outside of your ech chamber. If they operate in a critical sector, they are controlled by the CCP. I mean, you do accept that the CCP is an oppressive, authoritarian regime, right? If you don’t accept that, then we can’t carry on because you’re not in the same reality or arguing in bad faith.

                And before the defense: “but they’re really capitalists” - yeah, so what? Errybody greedy. Still doesn’t change that the CCP is an authoritarian regime. I have the feeling that no matter what, you’re going to move the goalposts because, I dunno, America bad? (and yeah, we’ve got a lot to account for and I’m no 'merica cheerleader). And no amount of evidence will sway you.

                May you have the day you deserve.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      127 months ago

      Not sure if you’ve been paying attention but citizens have no say over stuff like this. 99% of the politicians in office were placed there by rich people - they have the only true votes. The bill included money to Ukraine (great), and Israel (WTF), and Taiwan, and TikTok. It shouldn’t be legal to package all that stuff together, but it’s pretty standard. Anyway not sure who you’re talking to - there are like a few hundred politicians who supported this bill, most of them probably for other reasons, and none of them are on Lemmy.