• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    All cars should cost 500k minimum and roads should stop being built, also cap all auto-industry salaries and annual shareholder payouts to 500k with the rest overflowing to the workers. Within 20years seeing a car in America will be rare, within 50years, we’ll have solved climate change.

    • MuchPineapples
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Cars are like 5% of co2 emmisions. Until they ban dirty ship oil and curb industry emissions (world wide), nothing will change.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Ah yes the old “ban living in rural America” strategy, that will play well. Reliance on cars was a mistake but its too late to just pretend a lot, if not most, Americans need a car to live.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Did you know that before cars, people lived in rural america and that most of rural america was served by trains.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Most of rural America wasn’t served at all, you had to travel to a town with a train station. For smaller towns, no lines were ever built. It’s a completely unrealistic idea. It also doesn’t address the issue of local transport.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      We will be long dead as China will have taken over the world if we implemented these policies and crippled our economy and military because of it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Sounds good. In the meantime I’ll be taking an electric train to a brewery that is currently a 2hr drive from me since I’m no longer slaving away so that MIC executives can build planes that don’t fly, for a war that isn’t going to happen.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          You certainly won’t be doing that in America lol. Unrealistic in the next 30 years at least.

          Have to keep going and ensure survival so that we can get to that point.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s the only system that works (if you ignore the planned economy that has built 45,000km of high speed rail and has a home ownership rate of 90%+, and has more green energy production than the rest of the world combined)!! That’s basic economics!!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Jokes on you, I can actually already take a train from Chicago to Kalamazoo and enjoy a beer from Bell’s Brewery. It’s not a high-speed train to get there, but that can be upgraded if there was ever the desire to do so.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Capitalism creates monopoly. The consumer’s needs can be manufactured. In a society organized around capital shareholder needs are paramount.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Same, but I fear the risk of the car getting hacked giving the hacker the control or an EMP attack causing the electric car to shutdown indefinitely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        ICE cars are just as reliant on computers. Have you seen the articles on “your car is spying on you” and BMWs heated seat monthly fee?

        Plus, when you consider all the emissions controls required by the government versus the car companies trying to make the cars exciting for the consumer, the whole thing ends up one big giant mess of computer and sensors.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        An EMP will brick any car from the past 3 decades. And also trigger ww3, so I’m not sure if you’ve got your priorities straight there.

  • The Uncanny Observer
    link
    fedilink
    451 year ago

    Well too fucking bad for the auto industry? Just because it’s an American industry doesn’t mean we should give a fuck about it. If they want our loyalty, make fucking better cars.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Oh the thing is we should totally care!

      Not for the “losses of expected revenue” of car industry shareholders, I don’t care about that.
      But for years already I hate that china, you know, the most hardcore surveillance state, is pumping Europe with their computerized automatic surveillance machines!
      At least they are not operating as automatized killing machines. Yet.

      And before anyone says. I feel the same about other, noon-chinese cars too that are filled with all kinds of external sensors. I hate Teslas with a passion, but in my opinion chinese cars are even worse, just as chinese, state sponsored apps on our phones.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      If they want our loyalty, make fucking better cars

      I mean, in the spirit of the post, make fucking cheaper cars

      Cars have been getting expensive AF

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Cars has been so poorly made dor 1 or 2 decades now, that I respect most people who drives late 90’s to early 00’s cars.

        Electric cars are a joke in terms of quality. How they don’t have self-dignity at all?

  • umami_wasabi
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If it pass safety standards without all those smart and data collection bs and being reliable for 7+ years with easy part sourcing I might give it a try.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Until they’re testing and pass NHTSA standards, fuckin nope.

    Maybe people will change their minds once they see the aftermath of high speed crashes in these things. Or crashes with a MUCH heavier vehicle. With the weight of EVs these days you NEED a car that’s designed around safety.

  • VodkaSolution
    link
    fedilink
    421 year ago

    80s: You wouldn’t buy a Japanese car!
    90s: you wouldn’t buy a Korean car!
    00s: you wouldn’t buy a small Italian car!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    10
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Even Xiaomi has released the SU7, a real Tesla killer and also way cheaper. But not for the US market, but for the EU.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    I’d rather walk than spend money on an ‘American’ car. Fuck, I’d rather walk period but you can catch my drift.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Even some domestic brands like Juiced go on sale for like, $1,200 for a Juiced Ripracer. Aventon appears to make good stuff too, if you want bike shop support. I’ve had my bike for a month and put 320 miles on it. Fun little bike :)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Oh I was making a joke, like you posted an ‘or’ comment & I replied Yes like it will do both. 😂 Good bike, blows your balls off.

          I’ve been looking at Super73 for years as a CLASSIC styling, really handsome ebike. YouTube search for things like Survival ebike, ebike for preppers. Because you’ll tap into a whole community of people that want good & tough ebikes, not flimsy crap, ebikes that should be good relatively long-term. I trust Canadian Prepper; this video is a little older but information & considerations tend to be relevant years later.

          I saw another prepper cheaping it with $700-800 ebikes, if I find it I’ll post name & link…

          Anyway jokes aside I hope that helps. Idk your situation but I’d almost be tempted to wait just a few more years; pandemic/oil prices have pushed so many ebikes into the wild & that has brought about soooooo much real-world testing & consumer feedback. I’m thinking the ebikes just a few years from now will be so much better, and possibly for cheaper or the same price.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            In my experience preppers buy things that sit in their storage space unused. I want something I can use hard (as a cargo bike) several times per day, every day, for decades.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              This is a valid criticism that we talk about…working through supply, using supply, and becoming familiar with it is actually the ideal we should all strive for. 🙂 Idk about any bike, electric or not, that can withstand hard use several times/day for decades. (o_O) But product design is getting better all the time!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Oh, I definitely know bikes that can survive hard use for decades. Of course you have to change wearing parts every X thousand km, but the bike should last generations.

                What I’m unsure about is the e-bikes. I really don’t want the battery to catch fire or explode. And the motor should last generations.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Some of the best bikes that last decades were built in the 1970s. There are some machines that don’t get more durable when you throw more R&D at it.

                Breakthroughs in product design for nonelectric bikes have been mostly optimizing weight, but very minor improvements that don’t apply steel cargo bikes built to last generations.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    117
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Everyone is broke as fuck we are open to cheap everything. People are living in literal sheds

    • htrayl
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      No, most of us are broke because we insist on ensuring that suburban mcmansions are the only places to really live. When you spend 30% on driving and 40% on housing, suddenly you are broke.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yeah that’s what I don’t get, people complain housing is unnafordable now, but their expectation for a house is way higher than previous generations, and squander their money on “necessities” that really aren’t that. Yes, the housing market IS fucked, but by less than people make it seem like

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        it’s like you’ve never heard of roommates. If you get a third job and find a couple people, i’m sure you could afford to rent a shed

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      It’s difficult to compete with Chinese companies that operate at a loss and are subsidized by the Chinese government.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            Subsidies are an incredible tool when used well, like when they funded a bunch of utility cooperatives that electrified rural US. Maybe you’re asking why we should because propping up the car industry when public transit and bike infrastructure should be subsidized instead, rather than challenging subsidies, though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          221 year ago

          We do. They just send the windfall to exec salary and shareholders rather than to tax paying customers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        281 year ago

        Fucking lol. Good thing we don’t subsidize ANYTHING AT ALL and never export anything either. Boy. You’d have to be EVIL to want your country to have AFFORDABLE CARS. What’s next, AFFORDABLE HOUSING?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      561 year ago

      “We hear you, American consumer! You say you want a sub-$40k, small, basic EV. So here’s another luxury SUV/pickup truck/yacht crossover starting at $90,000.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Nooooo, you have to buy local, get our new Chevro-laid Mountain Dew 16x16 for only 250k (Tips not included)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      351 year ago

      They’ll just ban them from being imported. Far cheaper to pay off some politicians than it is to compete or whatever. Kinda like the tariffs on the solar panels ‘flooding the market’ they just announced.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    761 year ago

    Don’t cram touchscreens and smart features into every fucking aspect of your car. Keep your costs low, keep prices low, and believe it or not, you’ll tap into the “bottom” 60% of the market that has been forced to buy used for the last 10 years. I don’t want a base trim 10 year old Honda Accord with 150k miles, but it’s all I can find for under $20k.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I keep getting shit on for wanting an EV with manual roll-up windows where you have to use your hands, a super basic FM stereo kit, and a dash clock being the most advanced shit inside. I don’t need rear-view cameras and sensors and other shit that complicates and increases repair and insurance costs. I don’t get it. Give me dead simple, please and thank you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        40
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Back up cameras are mandatory in the US, and apparently Automatic Emergency Braking will be mandatory starting in 2029, so you’ll be stuck with some sensors whether you like it or not.

        But otherwise I agree that buttons and dials are better for controlling AC and radio than a touchscreen ever will be.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Backup cameras are useless for many people. I can either wear glasses so that I can see where I’m driving, or I can take them off to see the fisheyed backup screen. Not both.

          • desktop_user [they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            the backup camera is useful when the rear window is obstructed (such as from mud/dust) and for comically large vehicles where a short pole wouldn’t be visible if it was less than 3ft behind it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Good thing glasses are permanently superglued to your face and thus it’s impossible to swap between having them on and off when swapping between going backwards and forwards…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Except for those of us who, you know, like to see where we’re going rather than relying on a limited FOV camera. Of course, if I could learn to remove and replace them while keeping both hands engaged in actually, you know, steering the damn car, that’d be great.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                I better have both hands on the wheel for all those times I’m mid turn and shift while still moving into reverse……

                It’s… for when you’re backing up. You’ve come to a complete stop. You’re going to stop before you start moving forward again. It’s not hard to tilt glasses onto the top of your head while you stop or flip them back down when you stop.

                A MUCH bigger issue would be the rear view mirrors which are just cameras and screens.

                Are you mixing the two up?

            • Les Orchard (at SDF)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              That’s not a reasonable thing to expect to have to do while driving. Sounds like the “you’re holding it wrong” of cars

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Backup cameras are pretty good imo because they let you see the small things you wouldn’t be able to see out of a mirror. Helps prevent needless accidents. If you don’t wanna use it, just don’t look at it. Most cars should still have rear view mirrors

        • Snot Flickerman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Yeesh. I’m still driving a vehicle from 1999. Guess I’m out of the loop on the backup camera thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Wut? I bought a brand new car for €11k three years ago. Right enough the same car is 15k now but still

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Touch screens in cars are a massive safety issue. I’m not saying they don’t have some benefits but the fact that many newer cars have basically no physical buttons to perform basic functions is a problem. I can feel for the dial to adjust the volume or change the radio station. But a touch screen encourages the driver to take their focus off the road. That’s a serious problem.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      fedilink
      351 year ago

      Touchscreens and “smart” features don’t add enough cost to justify the premium you pay for them.