• True. But I did mention that they were also friendly. I had no issue getting into all sorts of activities with them. From playing the Shamisen to practicing Sadō. I had lots of friends who would help me out in all sorts of things, such as the University entrance exam, moving stuff, and translation.

          I’m speaking of my experiences of course. I come from a different cultural background (Arab). I lived in both the US and Japan, and in almost all aspects except employment and income, I prefer Japan. Your mileage may vary.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Welcome, though? They pretty famously don’t like foreigners around them, even if they’re not going to say it directly to you.

        • Have you lived there? Not my experience. I felt like I was welcomed. I was welcomed into their cultural activities, I was welcomed into their homes. I did put effort into learning the language and the culture, and followed their norms to the best I can.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, but a lot of other people have and you’re a definite minority saying that, so, X to doubt basically.

            It’s not just people who don’t bother trying, either. BBC’s long term Japan correspondent wrote an article about it when he finally left, and I’m pretty sure he’s fluent.

            • मुक्त
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              … BBC’s long term Japan correspondent wrote an article about it when he finally left, and I’m pretty sure he’s fluent.

              I wouldn’y be too sure about being fluent part. I am an Indian and I have seen bulk of so called indologists (professors in American and European academia) unable to pronounce common sanskrit words - despite writing bestsellers on the subject.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        241 year ago

        I shared that experience. I also was actively excluded from all sorts of things (including essential services) because I was a foreigner. Whenever a group of expats got together, at some point in the night, the conversation would be about how everyone got discriminated against recently.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    I mean he’s not wrong, but where does he expect China to get immigrants from? They’re 20% of the world.

    • livus
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He’s also cherry picking data. It’s a weird flex.

      The proportion of immigrants in the US isn’t exactly high compared to somewhere like Canada.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean the US is 15% immigrants, or about 50 million people. I know we like to shit on the US but that’s a ridiculously big number.

        • livus
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In terms of raw numbers thee US has a huge population so it has more of everything, whether that’s immigrants or murderers or doctors or pedophiles.

          In perms of the percentage of its population tho, 15% is somewhere in the middle of the pack, well behind countries like Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Switzerland etc.

          Boasting that you have more immigration than random countries like Japan is just odd.

          • BolexForSoup
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            For the same reason we can’t take 15min without the context of the US’s size, smaller countries having larger percentages also need to be contextualized. The raw number does have some meaning here. It’s also about annual rate of immigration.

            • livus
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The US has been wavering between 16% and 15% for about a decade which is when I started taking an interest in this stuff. It’s a fairly steady state.

              My country has risen from 25% to 27% first generation migrants in that timeframe.

              Per capita is a much more useful for comparing effects on total workforce etc.

              It’s not necessarily good or bad per se. I think there are so many variables at play, everything from type of migration, underlying birth rate of host country through to effect on housing stock and whether taxes and infrastructure can keep pace.

              But yeah Biden’s speech was just strange given that context.

              • BolexForSoup
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It would be much more useful to look at it state-by-state as a few states are doing the heavy lifting. I say this as someone is decidedly pro-immigration. The logistics are no small matter

                I live in Louisiana. Our only major experience with immigration was hurricane Katrina and they basically rebuilt our communities. I am eternally grateful.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Boasting that you have more immigration than random countries like Japan is just odd.

            He’s not boasting; he’s saying that immigration would do a lot to solve their problems; and he’s correct. I hate Biden’s guts but he’s correct here. For context Japan is a notoriously xenophobic country and currently sits at a 2%. They’re not “a random country”.

            In perms of the percentage of its population tho, 15% is somewhere in the middle of the pack, well behind countries like Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Switzerland etc.

            I mean people deciding to come to your country isn’t proportional to your population, or really related at all. It’d be like expecting China to have the same 15% as the US (for context that’d be about 250 million people). That’s just not how that works.

            • livus
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I agree he specifically called out Japan to contrast with the US because its immigration was weaker.

              people deciding to come to your country isn’t proportional to your population

              Are you saying fewer people decide to come to the US than to those other countries?

              Seems unlikely. Pretty sure the US could let in a lot more immigrants if it wanted to.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                Pretty sure the US could let in a lot more immigrants if it wanted to.

                I mean yes that’s the case for everyone. I’m saying the number of people applying to immigration to the US isn’t four times that of Germany, for example, so even if they accept people according to the exact same criteria Germany will have a bigger percentage.

                • livus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Are you sure? I’d expect the number applying to the US would be hundreds of times higher than the number applying to New Zealand.

                  I don’t especially love or hate Biden btw, I mean I can’t stand US foriegn policy on the Gaza Genocide but it’s not like their other mainstream politicians wouldn’t have done more or less the same. It’s a real pity the US hadn’t been able to elect someone like Bernie Sanders.

  • swiftcasty
    link
    fedilink
    43
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why am I seeing multiple news reports today about Joe Biden where they remove context to polarize his comments further? This feels, to me, like a new media trend

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Every news article posted here and across all platforms is public relations, or propaganda. You need / must understand this. There are 1200 stories, graphics, and videos posted per day, just from the Wash. Post. source

              the number includes both staff-produced articles and wire stories, written elsewhere. The *Post *editorial staff itself produces about 500 stories per day, she said.

              Every story is curated in some way as it filters here. Users decide what they deem worthy of posting.

              It’s all propaganda, unless it’s my side. /s

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    Partly true about inviting foreigners. Japan has a trainee visa system that is abusive, as they always are, and is designed so that those employees (victims) never get citizenship. And it’s a single citizenship country, because of course it is. But hey, employers are very willing to bring in those laborers, since it’s cheaper than paying what the law requires.

    And you can’t fix demographics with people who only stay for a year or two.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Who cares what this genocidal fascist has to say. The sooner he kicks it the better it will be for everyone else.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    361 year ago

    He’s not wrong but also I believe there’s a saying in English about stones and glass houses.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Don’t let your stones hang out if you live in a glass house? /s

      I swear I’ve heard balls referred to as stones likely by a British person, but I don’t know if I’m making that up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Even the most bigoted parts of the US are nowhere near as xenophobic as Japan. Housing discrimination based on race is still perfectly acceptable over there, many people will refuse to rent to foreigners.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Do you think there isn’t housing discrimination happening in the US?

        Black families often have their homes appraised for less than white family homes.

        Housing applications often get denied if the person has a non white last name.

        Hell, the last time I was looking around for a room to rent I got asked multiple times over the phone. “You’re white right?”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        perfectly acceptable

        At least some governments in Japan appear to disagree:

        https://jobsinjapan.com/living-in-japan-guide/housing-discrimination-challenges-faced-by-foreigners-in-japan/

        Japan signed the “International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)” in 1996

        Tokyo Metropolitan Government educates real estate agents on the illegality of nationality-based rental refusals, considering them discriminatory

        And the article itself seems to contradict with those statements…

  • 𐕣 C M D R ░ NOVA 𐕣
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    As neat as Japan sounds and as much as I’d like to be there, I mean, he’s not wrong

    I watch YouTubers who moved to and live there talk about how they’re just indefinitely treated like a tourist

    • BNE
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Broken clocks and all that - but this one only has one hand working at this point. We’re always counting down to midnight, for some reason.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    791 year ago

    The president made the remark while arguing that Japan, along with Russia and China, would perform better economically if the countries embraced immigration more.

    Oh, well that’s true enough. Japan is crazy anti immigration despite that being a solution to their low birth rate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Pretty much every country in the world where citizenship, nationality, and ethnicity are the same thing you find xenophobia.

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    961 year ago

    Immigration absolutely helps the US economy, because it parasitically siphons all the skilled workers out of other countries that it underdevelops and hoards their labor for itself.

    People think remittances help underdeveloped countries, but labor is the superior of capital, losing that skilled labor is never worth the paltry sums that get sent back home. It’s just another shape that imperialism takes.

    • BarqsHasBite
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In Canada we heavily base immigration on education. So we’re siphoning off the best educated of other countries. I mean this is just fucking those countries.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I mean that’s the whole point of the US higher education system, excepting the Republicans (with the help of Democrats) broke the parts of our immigration system that is supposed to take advantage of educating the world.

      • Dessalines
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        That’s truly one of the worst things about brain drain / educated people moving to the imperial core countries for the high salaries. Global south countries really need educated young people helping to solve their own problems, and Canada and the US rip out their heart and soul.

        At least in tech / programming, a good chunk of us are devoting most of our labor time to not just wasteful things, but actively harmful things, like trying to get people to click on ads, or increasing viral engagement.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          I mean tbf (at least in my case as an Egyptian) it’s not just the high salaries. Maybe Egypt is an extreme case but this country just has no future. The regime isn’t just dictatorial; it’s also dumb. There’s almost no money going to scientific research, the system as a whole was outdated 50 years ago, the military is monopolizing everything and undercutting the market because they can use slave conscript labor and don’t pay taxes, etc etc. I’m firmly of the opinion that this is at least partially caused by Britain’s unwillingness to fully decolonize in the 1920s and their godawful decolonization in the 1950s, but the fact remains that these countries have a duty to their people that they’re not fulfilling, and that’s why brain drain happens.

          As a living example of said brain drain, salaries were near the bottom of my priority list when I made the decision. I was more concerned about living somewhere where I don’t need to worry about being arrested because I said my opinion on the internet (or even just complained about prices) or because I do my prayers at the mosque (I was actually told by my mother to not go to the mosque all the time because I might get arrested. It’s that bad). Below that were things like a sane administration that actually cares about things being even just barely functional, a decent education system and academia and the ability to have confidence that the country will actually exist in 20 years. Living in a wildly different country (especially as a Muslim in Japan as is my case (halal food is a pain to get here)) is such a pain you couldn’t pay me to do it, but it’s hard to turn down actually getting to have a future.

          What I wanna say is that it’s not just the Global South being undercut by the West; many Global South countries are failing at fulfilling their responsibility towards their constituents, and that’s why they’re leaving. Now how much the West was involved in creating this situation is another story, but you can’t reduce it to just high salaries. Global South governments, as a rule, aren’t interesting in solving their own problems. That’s why the problem solvers go solve Western rich people’s problems.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            Egypt is also a useful case study, because the US props up its shitty government. That’s also part of how the Global South is underdeveloped, it’s a multifaceted machine that sucks out everyone who can help make the country better and gives support and resources to the people making it worse. It’s not just legacy from the 20’s and 50’s, this is an ongoing problem that is created by imperialism.

            Also when a Global South government tries to solve its problems, such as through nationalizing resources or land reform, the US buries them under sanctions and attempts to make a regime change. This, too, is part of how imperialism underdevelops the Global South.

      • BolexForSoup
        link
        fedilink
        17
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I get what you two are saying, but this kind of removes agency from the people doing the moving.

        Also: Should people not be allowed to move to another country if they’re “too useful” or “skilled”?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s no agency in the market. That’s the entire point of markets - being independent of a single human’s whims and being an equalizing force, the “invisible hand”.

          And the entire point of communism is getting that agency, having production for the sake of humans rather than humans for the sake of production.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              No, migration is caused by economics, so it only makes sense to use economics to talk about it. In capitalism, migration follows the market laws, i.e. people migrating to where they expect to be paid more.

              • BolexForSoup
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I took basic Econ. My point is decisions are multi-faceted. We are not all slaves of the invisible hand 24/7 as it guides our every single decision.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Idk about everyone else, but I think the issue is something like the “oh so you hate capitalism but participate in it?” meme.

                  An argument for agency can be made either for or against, but for most it boils down to the reality of the society you’re trying to exist in. It’s just a huge distraction that you’ve created along with others for anecdotal conversations. This is a US sitting democratic president calling insults to allies during a time-period where conflict is on the rise, while completely negating any resolutions that could impede the death being caused.

                  We could talk about Biden’s own xenophobia with the immigration and border response. His past with the crime bill and other negative legislation. The fact that the entire Democratic Party is xenophobic to anyone outside of their party including the “poor” or progressive strangers they fear so much, like we saw with the recent condemnation of the protests against Palestinian genocide.

                  Instead you’ve made 10+ comments bringing up other countries to blame, links back to other comments in this thread, boasting about taking a basic Econ class and proclaiming you’ve won because a couple of people upvoted you. I understand your argument, it’s just not valid at this time or during this discussion and you’re trying to force it with hostility till people “get it”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          It also has a chicken-egg problem. What if the indicators of talent or skill aren’t apparent because of abysmally poor living and educational conditions? The lack of opportunity in many developing countries is such that people will be less successful and appear less talented simply because their country has limited ways for them to demonstrate it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Hi, one of the people that did the move: they are absolutely right. I got through uni and masters for free at federal universities, my education is amazing. My country gets nothing back because there is no industry there that’d take me and university positions are limited.

          I made the bese choice for myself and am aware of how bad my choice is for home

        • BarqsHasBite
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          People don’t have free agency to move to any country they want. In my view the free agency which you say is being removed never actually existed in the first place.

          But I do find it funny that “give me your poor” (yes I’m borrowing from the US) turned into “give me your elite”.

          • BolexForSoup
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I didn’t say people had free agency to go to any country they want. You are presenting a false dichotomy. There are different people with different access to different places with different senses of urgency and for different reasons. Many people make choices on whether or not to immigrate, as well as where to immigrate if they choose to. They have agency, they are not just pawns in this discussion to be shuffled around.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          People make their own history, but they do not make it as they please. Our material conditions limit our agency. We go where the jobs are, where the money is, where the possibilities for a better future are. Those are all choices.

          But you can’t ignore the material conditions that lead to those choices. We aren’t just free floating agents in a sea of possibilities.

          • BolexForSoup
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            People make their own history, but they do not make it as they please.

            Never said they or we do

            Our material conditions limit our agency.

            Totally agree

              • BolexForSoup
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Your phrasing of your first comment certainly read that way to me. I didn’t misspeak. If I did not understand your meaning/intention that’s a fair claim.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          That’s not it, but in many cases Western imperialism is involved in the conditions that made these people want to leave in the first place.

          • BolexForSoup
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not blaming them I am saying they still often make a decision. They are humans who have some control of their lives. That’s not mutually exclusive with saying they are also pressured externally.

            The way they were originally described made it sound like they are just pieces on a board incapable of deciding what they want and acting on it.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        Don’t misunderstand, the people moving to the US are blameless. Imperialism works by siphoning up all of the skilled labor around the world for itself in order to make life better for people within the imperial core, and this is part of how the imperial nations underdevelop other countries. People get educations in their home countries (often at the government’s expense) and then they take that education out of the country to put it to use in the US (or France or Canada etc). They’re just going where the jobs are, though, that’s not their fault at all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Except where there’s little opportunity to utilize the highly skilled labor. They are going abroad anyway to find job opportunities befitting of their skill set and the highest bidder. Doesn’t matter if the US or EU took them, they’re leaving because the local opportunity doesn’t exist.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        Yes, and the people who could develop that local opportunity aren’t there. They all leave as soon as they can.

        That’s why I said they’re underdeveloped countries. They’re not “developing” in truth, but are being kept from becoming developed. How do you think that happens? In part it happens because of the IMF giving predatory loans and then imposing austerity on the people when the government can’t pay their loans back, but it also happens because labor is the superior of capital and these countries are losing skilled labor.

        I am not blaming them for leaving their countries. I am blaming underdevelopment, which is a product of imperialism.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I think “extremely ethnocentric” is a more fair description/criticism of Japan. Close to 98% of their population is ethnically homogeneous, so it kinda makes sense.