I can’t help but think of this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    I tend to always read these, both when I sign up and when there are changes. Idk if I ever felt that it changed significantly at all from what I expected originally. They are “updated” annually and when a new law passes so usually it is no change or something about the new law. Basically usually if you consented to the original privacy policy, updates are unlikely to have anything surprising and new to change your mind. I guess unless it went from none to some/a lot of shared data!

  • Karyoplasma
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    Just like those “we value your privacy” cookie banners that don’t give you the option to reject all. If they truly valued my privacy, they would give me that option instead of having me toggle off 500000 “partners” one by one in the hopes I accidentally skip one. Bastards.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Those aren’t compliant. The reject all needs to be as prominent as the accept all option without any additional clicks. So many sites get it wrong it’s insane!

      • ඞmir
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        So many sites get it wrong

        If they get away with it, they very much got it right

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      I like the one that takes 30 seconds to deny all but accepts all instantly.

      Most transparent dark pattern

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I just decide that any site doing that doesn’t really have anything meaningful to provide and has mostly copy-pasted content from actual resource-providing websites, with added SEO.
        So I just close the site most of the time.

        So far it has paid off. I tend to find more sites that give information that was actually written by someone knowledgable about the field.
        Thinking I should start making my own list, considering search engines are probably never going to make those easier to find.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Are they required by law or something to send those out? It is almost like needing to reconfirm your cookie in the webbrowser

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      It is honestly disgusting when they list the number of parties, especially when you see 100+ vendors on the “Legitimate purpose” toggle. Fuck off you have a legitimate purpose to my browsing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Ive gotten 4 notifications from sammy sung advising me they have updated their TOS. never used to get those

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know this bathroom, they have the stalls, you sit down and your head peeks over the top of the walls. I guess they expected everyone to be very short? I’m not even six foot so I don’t know. I think of it as the social shitter.

    If I remember, it’s pink.

    • WashedOver
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      There’s public washrooms like this in a mall in Seattle, or at least there was a few years back. Half height stalls. When one is sitting the walls only come up to your elbows. One of the most bizarre setups for a public bathroom I’ve seen in my travels.

  • J3K
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    “We value our customers’ privacy - it’s our main revenue stream!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re right, that’s unrealistic.

      If those stall dividers were fully opaque with a one-way mirror acting as the wall behind them all, that would be more like it.

  • Altima NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Lately, all Ive been getting are changes involving arbitration. Shit, I even got one from a fucking grocery store app.