Loss in terms of money or efforts. Could be recent or ancient.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    822 years ago

    When the Spanish were raping the New World in the 1500s for gold, they dumped enormous quantities of platinum into the ocean because it was the wrong kind of shiny metal. Nobody in Europe had any clue how valuable the stuff was, only that it was often used to counterfeit gold. But since it wasn’t gold, or even silver, everyone thought it was worthless. This was exasperated by the fact that nobody could melt the stuff until the 1800s. But mostly it was just not yellow enough for the idiots at the time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        162 years ago

        I hope the Redditors that didn’t care about the whole thing never find their way here. I can’t imagine being that apathetic about something you use daily.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Eh. I wouldn’t hold that against them. Reddit or Lemmy is just social media. Just one small aspect in people’s lives. Pretty hard to care about something like Reddit taking away API access when you’ve got much more important things like a job, a social life and a family to care for. Even harder when you only use the official apps.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      I wish it had the same effect as version 4 of digg. He is probably still over there, editing posts he doesn’t like.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Nobody cared. Only reddit addicts and power tripping jannies, who all seem to have migrated here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        The thing to remember with these examples is that those companies would have royally fucked up their purchases. Big companies always impose a culture and a mindset.

        AT&T would definately have crushed the internet with a monopoly - we would have had to use AT&T approved internet devices, and they would have brought long distance type charges to it. Oh so your email is going overseas? That’s an extra 10c.

        Same with Google and Netflix. They were all able to continue with the founders vision and create something special.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That one really wasn’t as obvious at the time. Netflix was in huge debt and hadn’t really built their streaming platform yet. In fact streaming was barely possible. Blockbuster should have been able to out-compete Netflix at both dvd by mail and streaming but they screwed it up. Netflix won, but may now end up getting killed by the big studios.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            That one really wasn’t as obvious at the time.

            It never is, that’s how the investment market works. Blockbuster thought it was still ludicrously high for an ailing niche competitor. That’s arguable, but I don’t think anyone could guarantee Netflix was actually going to achieve their (at the time very sci-fi) vision.

  • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
    link
    fedilink
    62
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Elon acquiring Twitter for $44B in the first place, not taking into account the subsequent blunders. He not only overpaid too much for a social media company without even understanding it, he also wrecked Tesla’s stock price as investors saw he was clearly spending too much time on Twitter and he had to panic sell Tesla shares to fund his Twitter adventure. He easily wiped out hundreds of billions from Tesla’s market cap during that time.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    772 years ago

    Knight Capital - They were biggest equities trader in 2012. They manually deployed code and didn’t get configuration right and it reactivated “Powder Peg”. They lost $460 M in 45 minutes and went bankrupt.

    • BadyOP
      link
      fedilink
      242 years ago

      I agree, but unlike usual blunders this was very much planned!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Once the campaigns were underway, yes. But the opportunity came from a huge blunder by David Cameron. He called the referendum expecting an easy win for the remain side that would silence the anti-EU faction in his party and shore up his position as PM. Instead, the anti-EU faction won, prompting his own resignation and causing damage to the UK’s economy, a loss of global influence, the loss of British people’s right to live and work in the EU, and reopening difficult issues in Northern Ireland that had been laid to rest for years. It also arguably sped up the Conservative Party’s lurch to the right and its embrace of UKIP-like policies, disempowering Conservative moderates and leading to the spiral of ever less competent governments we have seen since then. In particular, Boris Johnson’s rise was a direct result of post-referendum power games among Conservative politicians.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          So what’s David Cameron up to these days? I’m sure such a massive and unnecessary screw-up has landed him in dire personal straights. /s

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          I didn’t keep up with this at all (I’m from across the pond) and I wondered why Brexit was even thought up in the first place.

          It’s so sad to see conservatives fucking things up over there too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            Well, I’m in Canada and our Conservatives are pretty active in making this a worse place to live too. Currently they run almost all of the provincial governments, but they may take the federal government after the next election. Not something to look forward to.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              82 years ago

              It’s heartbreaking to see happen with y’all. We’re a mess, PLEASE LEARN FROM US!

              religious right wingers are dangerous AF. Don’t let religious folk skate by on some “we’re persecuted” shit.

              They know what they’re doing, don’t treat them with kid gloves like we did in the US

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              As long as Truedu isn’t running the party has a chance. Conservatives are split 4 ways and liberals only 2.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1792 years ago

    China’s Four Pests campaign is a great example. As the campaign says, China had a bit of a pest problem. One of these particular pests was the sparrow. The government decided it would be a great idea to launch an “exterminate sparrows” campaign. The only problem was sparrows ate other pests such as bedbugs and locusts.

    In short, they sucessfully curbed the “sparrow problem” and replaced it with a “locusts and bedbugs problem”. This ultimately upset the ecological balance and further lowered the rice yields. It was a complete disaster

    • Tippon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      I vaguely remember reading about that when I was younger. I don’t know if it’s true, but this is what I read.

      The peasants and farmers were made to stand in the fields throwing stones at the sparrows, preventing them from landing. The thinking was that the sparrows would die from exhaustion, if they weren’t killed by the stones.

      What actually happened was that the existing crops were either trampled or broken by the stones, and as the farmers weren’t working the fields, nothing grew the following year either.

      Like I say, I have no idea whether it’s true, or if it was just 80’s anti communist propaganda, but it’s stuck in my head ever since.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’d be shocked if they could actually throw that many rocks, but the basic idea is that the policy didn’t work as intended, and that’s correct.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      30
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The great leap forward was such a colossal clusterfuck that you can’t blame it on any one thing (although most of them would be prevented without the authoritarianism). Literally everything was wrong. Sparrows, lysenkoism, forced collectivization (basically, and perhaps ironically, farmers not owning the means of production), Mao just being evil, backyard burners, rigid chain of command that gave the chairman absolute authority but at the same prevented him from knowing what was going on, everything.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Oil spills, wars, Hiroshima/Nagasaki, not counting for 2 decimal places in employee cheques by a large firm in Metropolis

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Hiroshima and Nagasaki were deliberate atrocities, not sure how you’d list them as blunders.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        How about neither atrocity nor blunder? It was the right thing to do and saved lives on both sides by ending the war in the Pacific. Wars still happen but we’ve gone nearly 80 years without making the world wars into a trilogy since nobody sane wants to invite that level of destruction again.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          The first bomb could be argued as saving lives. The second was just to test another type of nuclear bomb.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Not this again. Just because you can end a war faster by intentionally targeting civilians doesn’t mean it’s ever going to be moral or ethical. The U.S. government considers that act terrorism by definition.

          I’m not going to relitigate the whole argument again. The U.S. government knew women and children were in the cities and the military proceeded to nuke the cities instead of an uninhabited because they wanted to show off the power of the weapon and observe the level of urban damage it could do.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            And remind me the estimated casualty counts of operation downfall, along with the civilian casualties and damage. Not to mention a North Japan and South Japan like germany.

            You won’t. But consider a pragmatic view and not an idealistic view, so be it if you need a show of force for an enemy who refuses to surrender and would rather destroy themselves and all who would try to make them yield utterly and totally.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Could do a show of force in an area where people don’t live, and then threaten to use it in cities or something. Like other countries with nukes do…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Are you kidding? Not to say we didn’t exactly have that luxury in 1945, but we didn’t.

                We had enough uranium and plutonium for the 3 bombs, and that was it. Our bluff was that we would keep doing it. And the nuke hadn’t been displayed before that point either, so what good is a threat when it hasn’t been shown before? We did exactly that and they didn’t care.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            No need, they were both among a set of legitimate targets. It wasn’t terrorism and the only people complaining about it slept through all their history classes.

  • U de Recife
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Any history book will be filled with such stories. Depending on the outlook, I’d say all history is like that.

    Take any one event. Let’s pick any decisive moment in history. Say, the battle of Salamis. Now flip it to the side of the Persians and you have the kind of blunder you’re looking for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Very true when talking historical events. Say the USA lost the American Revolution and it’s now a land mass of Brits that can’t believe how foolish the revolutionaries were. (Although if other colonies are any indication independence may have eventually happened anyways)

      • WtfEvenIsExistence3️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Difference being canada still sings “God save the Queen/King” and it would be a parliamentary government instead of the 3 branches. Maybe things would be less deadlocked and more democratic if the American Revolution failed. (Ironic, I know)

        • Vlaxtocia [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Although ww1 would have looked very different if the UK had America’s resources from day 1

  • Call me Lenny/Leni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    582 years ago

    The Gunpowder Plot. Guy Fawkes and his friends were about to blow up parliament, and on the week it was supposed to happen, one of his accomplices sent a letter to a noble. In what was probably the worst example of “asking for a friend” in history, it asked “hypothetically, what would happen if someone went into the basement and blew up parliament”. The noble did what nobody expected he would do and, get this, responded to the letter. People searched the palace basement and found Guy Fawkes, he was arrested and killed, and we have Guy Fawkes Day. The reason this led to a loss is because the king of England at the time used it as an excuse to persecute Catholics and make the holiday which is used as a taunt.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      Guy Fawkes wasn’t just killed though. He and his fellow conspirators suffered greatly before they died, and even after death their executioners inflicted torment on the corpses.

      "They were to be “put to death halfway between heaven and earth as unworthy of both”. Their genitals would be cut off and burnt before their eyes, and their bowels and hearts removed. They would then be decapitated, and the dismembered parts of their bodies displayed so that they might become “prey for the fowls of the air”.

  • Didros
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    Okay, I listen to a fair amount of history podcasts, so let’s see what I can pull out of my head for fun:

    There was Rainbow Man, who famously went to sports games across America, holding up a sign that read “John 3:16” in an attempt to convert people to Christianity. He later died in a hotel shoot out where he took a maid hostage in his hotel room full of guns.

    There was the time the President of America secretly went on a trip to Panama on one of two ships. While trying to show off to the president doing drills, the other ship accidentally shot a torpedo at the presidents ship. He pulled a pistol and attempted to shoot the torpedo with it.

    The settlement at Roanoke, which was one of the earliest attempts by Europeans to settle in America and by the time ships got back with supplies (I believe years after they said they would be back) the settlement was empty. Still unsolved to this day.

    America has dropped at least two nuclear warheads on itself accidentally, which have all failed to detonate.

    Benedict Arnold was one of the best military minds ever born in America. He paid for his own troops for years, and when he asked for repayment or even his own salary, the Republicans claimed he actually owed the government money. They gave him tje reputation of only caring about money and refused to ever pay him until he finally took money from Britan to make ends meet.

    George Bush senior crashed into German electrical lines and flew the plane back to base causing an international incident. He never received punishment for this and continued to fly for the military. He also did a bunch of drug smuggling and no one cared.

    Look into pretty much any time people wanted to explore an area for the first time and there was most likely a massive loss of life and money. Australia and America seem to have the funniest stories of people’s attempts to name every river and mountain they see.

    That’s what I got off the top of my head. :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      There was Rainbow Man, who famously went to sports games across America, holding up a sign that read “John 3:16” in an attempt to convert people to Christianity. He later died in a hotel shoot out where he took a maid hostage in his hotel room full of guns.

      ^ Emphasis mine. I was curious about this and did a search. Turns out he’s still alive.

    • Malgas
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      The settlement at Roanoke […] Still unsolved to this day.

      The word “CROATOAN” was carved on one of the buildings in the colony. The colonists had had friendly interactions with the native people living on Croatoan Island, which was nearby. There were later reports of native people with fair skin and beards on Croatoan Island.

      So mysterious! Where could the colonists possibly have gone?

      • Didros
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        They were not the only white people to have ever been there though. The colonists could have been slaughtered and those were French decendents or something though. There is no way to prove what happened.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          172 years ago

          Historian here. Prove? No. Draw a highly likely conclusion that should accompany every telling as the most likely explanation? Yes.

    • bermuda
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      America has dropped at least two nuclear warheads on itself accidentally, which have all failed to detonate.

      These are known as “Broken Arrow” incidents, and at least 32 have been officially recognized by the government. Some of them were accidental releases of the bombs, others were plane (or other vehicle) crashes that contained bombs. There’s likely more that haven’t been recognized by the government. almost all of them happened between 1950 and 1980. Now that the cold war has died down, we haven’t been moving around our nuclear warheads as often and so haven’t had a new one. At least, not an official new one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s pretty hard to have an accidental detonation at this point, though. Prompt criticality is tricky to achieve and easy to deliberately not achieve. Word is the newest bombs require a specific electronic sequence of fuse activations that’s stored encrypted, and would require being a superpower to reproduce, so it’s actually impossible to set them off as designed even if one was stolen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      None of these resulted in losses. In fact the nuclear bomb example is notable precisely because there were no losses. They’re amusing failures or errors, but nothing was lost.

      • Didros
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        A nuke costs something like $80,000,000 to produce. It takes time and effort from multiple groups of people. What is an example of losses if this doesn’t count?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    Scotland trying to colonize the Darien gap It bankrupted Scotland and forced the union of England and Scotland to be the UK.