• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    127
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Even if it was free, opening an app to get water is bullshit.

    Edit: Let the record show, I was referring to the chilled water.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        57
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It “clearly” says, “USE APP TO ACCESS”, so no, you can’t just push the button. It has to verify your subscription first.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            391 year ago

            @[email protected] said, “Even if it was free…” which implies he’s talking specifically about the paid button on the right and not the free button on the left.

            The implication being even if the chilled and filtered water was also free, having to open an app for the button to work would be bullshit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              101 year ago

              Put me down on team “even if it was free…”

              Keep fighting the good fight, it turns out words mean things.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              101 year ago

              Meh, he says, “opening an app to get water.” I think there’s some fudging going on here.

              Water is available with no app.

              Certain processed water is offered with an app.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    I would rather take the tap water than trust the maintenance of whatever filter they put in there.

      • Queue
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        In America, tap water is either “Fine, maybe a little odd if you’re used to bottle water, but probably fine.” to “It’s not safe to drink this shit.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Drinks water from gallon jugs because the faucet spews well water from limestone near an oil refinery

          I know people who can’t tell the difference between the well and spring water, they are not my homies.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I can tell the difference between my cities perfectly adequate and safe tap water, and water that’s from a Brita.

            There’s literally nothing wrong with my tap water at all. I use a Brita because I don’t like the taste of my tap water.

            I know exactly zero other people who can tell the difference.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I started using a water filter because my cities water reeked of chlorine. Funnily enough a few months later a job listing appeared for a new water facility person and the water has not since smelled nor tasted bad, and that was about 5 years ago now

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Yeah I grew up trusting my local tap water which I drank regularly, and then I saw what happened in Flint and I became a little more wary. I always filter my water at home now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            You can typically look up your city’s water test results and see what’s in there or do your own testing. The vast majority of municipal water is plenty safe, and most issues with stuff like elevated lead come from the home/building itself, not the municipality.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I live in the Phoenix area. Our tap water won’t kill you, but it tastes nasty. That’s because aside from the hardness, it’s so full of chlorine to kill the bacteria, amoebas, and fungus that might kill you otherwise, it’s like drinking swimming pool water. Anyone who can afford it has a reverse osmosis filter for drinking water. Anyone who can’t afford it buys bottled water, which is probably why they can’t afford the filter…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Oh I have RO, one of the first things I put in when I bought the house, and already had to replace it once, the last one took really obscure filters that were hard to find, it ended up being simpler to replace the thing with one that took more common replacement filters. And I’ve tried more ordinary filters, it makes it better, but it still tastes funky, I prefer RO.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Protip: if it’s only chlorine and not chloramine you can gas it off. Fill a jug in the fridge and let it sit. Chloramine won’t allow this to happen because ammonia has been bonded to the chloride to make it stable i.e last longer in transport to customers. If that still makes it taste bad, I guess a filter or Brita type device is all I can say. Bottled water is horrible for you.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Yeah, letting it gas out works for the chlorine taste, but it still tastes funky, likely due to minerals so I’m fine with my RO.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    911 year ago

    If this was downtown or at parks I can kinda see them providing something. Knowing this is likely at a university library or building its just removing access that was already there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      531 year ago

      https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=(specific+heat+of+water)*12.8K*(1+gallon+*+water+density)

      200kjoules of heat must be removed from a gallon of water to cool from 55F to 32F (out of the ground down to pleasant drinking temperature).

      Assuming a COP of 2 for your compressor (conservative), that’s 100kjoules or 1/36 of a kWh.

      High price for a kWh of electricity is $0.25 in the US. So for your $2 subscription, you can pay for 8kWh per month or enough to cool 288 gallons of water or roughly 9 gallons per day. More than anybody would rightly use.

      What a fucking ripoff.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Not to mention that, in a place like a public park, 55F water is totally fine. It isn’t the coolest most refreshing drink of all time but it’s damn good from a public fountain on a 90F day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I drink to hydrate anyway. The thing that’s satisfying to me is liquid going in. The temperature’s nice if it’s cool but if it’s cold I can’t drink the water fast.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        You’re also paying for the installation of a refrigeration system right at the point where you want water.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure, but if everyone drinks a half gallon a day (still a lot for a normal person), that’s still 95% revenue which will absorb the installation cost quickly, and maintenance is minuscule on something like this.

          Not to mention that since its subscription based, a broken dispenser is actually more profitable in the short term.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      No it’s providing new access. Used to be, you had to take refrigerated water. Now you can have room temperature water which is superior because you can actually just drink it instead of having to sip it ultra slow.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        The fact that it adds access to room temperature water doesn’t change the fact that it removes access to cold water

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1341 year ago

      Fuck that. If it’s downtown or at a park the fucking municipality can afford $1.99/mo

      We need more public facilities. This privatization bullshit can kick rocks

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The heart of what you’re saying is right, but it isn’t 1.99, it’s 1.99x whatever their expected ussage/power/maintenance metrics are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Realistically the cost of filtration is already covered by the municipal water system’s budget, and the power and maintenance is already covered by the cities parks/public infrastructure budgets. So there is a small cost, but it’s at a scale where it’s negligible

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Obviously it isn’t, if it was there wouldn’t be a user facing cost. The fact this is a private venture basically proves that wherever this is, the municipality or building owner is only committed to providing tap water (which we see here is “free”) the cost is for the extra, private, infrastructure that has been added in order to provide cold filtered water. If you aren’t US, I’ll note that municipal water treatment and filtering vs the more “Britta” level implied here are entirely different and very much a thing for some people.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
          link
          fedilink
          46
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, it’s just what the usage/power/maintenance is. It’s not $1.99 times anything. $1.99 doesn’t enter into it anywhere. $1.99 was made up out of the whole cloth.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            Right this is what I really mean. It’s a trivial cost in the grand scheme of things for a municipality to provide public drinking fountains. This shouldn’t be outsourced to a for profit private enterprise.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              I don’t think the thing costs only $2 to install? $2 price per liter of refrigeration on your water does not imply the the system costs $2

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              It’s going to sound like I’m defending them in some way, which I’m really not because the whole thing is stupid, but they’re not charging for the drinking fountain they’re charging for the cold filtered water, which is going to incur some kind of power and maintenance cost that’s while negligible at scale is beyond the norm. Room temperature tap water is still free here.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Sorry I really hate this line of thinking.

              I also hate privatising costs for social services so we’re in agreement on that…

              … but no cost faced by the municipality is trivial. They correct taxes to pay for it. You can go to the meetings and have your say in how it’s spent. More water fountains means more money.

              If it were up to me we would increase taxes so we could have all the fountains.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Refrigerant and filter systems need to be powered, replaced and maintained, that DOES cost money. What math, if any of substance, was applied on top of that cost to reach the subscription price is debatable. Though perhaps ironically, if they didn’t expect many people to actually bite, then the cost per user would end up being abnormally high.

            • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
              link
              fedilink
              121 year ago

              Refrigerated water fountains have been existing in parks, schools, libraries, and public buildings for decades with no on-demand cost to their end users. Our tax dollars paid for them easily and the cost is obviously trivial compared to everything else your local or state government spends money on.

              There is no valid justification for this. It’s just greed.

              • Promethiel
                link
                fedilink
                61 year ago

                Thank you for stating the obvious. I fucking hate this future where even the basics of the past are starting to seem unreal. Little gray cubes with a wide bar you push and out comes cold water from a spout at the top; used to be everywhere outdoors growing up.

  • Somewhiteguy
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    Is it still a thing? The website doesn’t go anywhere and I can’t find the app. All I can actually find are a few articles talking about how ridiculous it is to have a $2 subscription service on water fountains.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      All I could find were articles from 2017 and I haven’t heard of it before, so I’m gonna say it’s not a thing any more.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Oh that’s funny. I still see these things installed in some buildings but it’s not like I ever saw anyone bother with the “premium water” but also now sodastream is getting in on it for I think a higher cost actually…

        Ugh. Please let this whole concept of selling tap water die.

    • partial_accumen
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      I found this indiegogo link from 7 years ago which gives a little more background. Its not quite as horrible as the picture suggests, I think.

      There’s some FAQ and Comments that give some background, like this one:

      Rier Esor 7 years ago I’ve been asked by a few people: why do we need reefill water stations when there are water fountains around NYC (if you look hard enough!) and we >all have tap water at home? What’s my best answer?

      Patrick Connorton 7 years ago PROJECT OWNER We’re also working with New York City and the Port Authority to map free public bottle filling stations around town – these are usually in or near >parks but, unfortunately, need to be off six months a year to avoid freezing and can be challenging to maintain. Reefill is a natural complement to >these fountains, filling in the gaps in parts of town where it is impractical or cost-prohibitive to install a water fountain.

      So it doesn’t sound like these were replacing existing free water fountains, but instead offering free (and paid) water in places never offered before by generating revenue from the paid water to support the installation of any water (including new free water) in places that had none before.

      It also looks like the project died in 2019.

      • deweydecibel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        filling in the gaps in parts of town where it is impractical or cost-prohibitive to install a water fountain.

        As usual, if it’s a gap in our public services, the answer is not “let a private company do it” it’s “tax the fucking rich and use that money to improve our public services”.

        Those water fountains didn’t even need to be water fountains. This was basically just a bastardized version of what they do in the UK. There’s a program over there called Refill, that businesses and public places participate in. You use a free app that shows you the locations of participating places, and those places have refill points, all for free.

        This person probably saw that and thought “let’s ditch the free and the volunteer participation part, build unnecessary fountains in unsustainable areas, and try and make some money off that sweet public utility”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    441 year ago

    I’m not going to hate the company for trying, but if you’re a building admin using these instead of Oasis or Elkay fill stations you’re a huge fucking asshole.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I don’t see why this kind of behavior should be excused if exhibited by a company vs. an individual. Would you also not fault your friends “for trying” to be an asshole to you in day to day life? Are humans not making the strategic decisions for that company?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I mean people can develop and sell whatever product they want at the price they want. Usually I’d recommend voting with your wallet, but presumably this would be up to facility management to install these for a captive audience, who wouldn’t have much choice in the matter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But with all the money they’re saving, they’ll be able to renovate the admin building for the first time in two years, or have a nice dinner for the big donors, or give even more money to the football team.

      Edit: assuming this is a uni. If not: won’t someone please think of the investors?

  • arglebargle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I can’t say I really hate this. If a company is willing to maintain this so there is always free water alongside a purchase option, it doesnt seem so bad.

    Because frankly a portion of my world looks like this right now: The corporations squeeze to get everything out of me, and a good portion of the populous want to make sure I can’t have nice things by fucking everything up. A public fountain? Oh yeah that shit will get destroyed or stolen within a week.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Here’s something that could be provided for free. Instead of innovating, I’m going to invent a shit version of this thing, give you free access to that, and then charge for the original version.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Cooling and filtering water is hardly free, nor is the added maintenance. I don’t know the context here but it may be something the building should be paying for.