• @Truck_kun@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My typical recommendation would be:

    Normie: uBlock Origin

    Techie: uBlock Origin + uMatrix

    Security Critical/Paranoia/Just Hate Yourself: uBlock Origin + uMatrix + NoScript

    I use the last option at work, and the middle option at home, and the first option for my wife’s computer.

    For me, a lot of it isn’t about ads, it’s more about the security risk of cross site scripting. Typically, if I’m visiting a site, I probably trust it, but I have no trust for people they sell ads to. I don’t mind sites I trust having a few non-intrusive ads, but of course that’s not the reason I use blockers; if a site has so many ads it is unusable, I just don’t ever visit it again (plenty of 'don’t show articles from ’ flags in my google news feed for this very reason. I’ll never know if you redeem yourself, because I will just never visit your site again.).

    • @boatswain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      If XSS is your concern, check out Firefox’s Container Tabs. They allow you to set up tab groups that restrict access to cookies to only tabs in that group, so you can just, eg, set up a group for your bank and restrict it to just your bank’s site. Your session cookie etc are then not available to any other tab groups.

      I pair that with the Temporary Containers extension, so any random tab I open is in its own container. Everything is always separate.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      i still miss the original noscript from the xul days :(

  • Irdial
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I’ve been using AdBlock Plus for at least ten years. Never had an issue

  • boredsquirrel
    link
    fedilink
    67
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In short: all are Crap, use UBlockOrigin

    (ABP is worse, Adguard “intelligently shows ads”, Ghostery is spyware)

    • just another dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      471 year ago

      Besides it’s usefulness as an adblocker, I like how it allows you to disable javascript for a site with just 2 clicks. Closing a newsletter popup works for a visit, but no javascript works forever.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          There are also (somewhat hidden) “hard modes” where the only indicator that you’re in a different mode is that the badge number next to the uBlock icon changes color.

          You can have it block all third party scripts by default for every website, or even go all out and basically use it like noscript. Pretty much breaks every individual website though but you can choose individually what to let through and save it based on domain (I believe) so you really only need to do it once.

  • @mydude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    I don’t really trust these adblockers… Has anyone tried using Greasemonkey or any of the equivalent script environments for adblocking? I know it’s posdible, but I could not find any good scripts available? Has anyone found any good scripts on github (or other places) for this?

    • @ivn@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      Why would you trust Greasemonkey and some random script over uBlockOrigin?

      Also it might be possible to do it partly but performance would inevitably be worse and I’m not sure every functionality would be implementable.

    • @leopold@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Content blockers like uBlock use filter lists which list every single element that needs to be blocked across the entire web. I currently have nearly 700000 of these filters active. That is very far outside the scope of a simple script. Basically all ad blocking userscripts are site-specific and they still usually block significantly less than uBlock would on the same site. Also, userscripts are not safer than extensions.

  • @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    DNS blocking with DNS over TLS (DoT) with OpenBSD unwind + disabling javascript

    • userscripts where javascript is required and the site is cancer (youtube, twitch, other corpomedia)
    • disable/compile without DNS over HTTPS (DoH)
      • I’m not sending my DNS requests to cloudflare, and I want my DNS to be system-wide

    always disable DNS prefetch

    works in any browser (system-wide actually), not just in Firefox/Chromium

  • @Spooty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    uBlock Origin + NoScript + Toggle referrer (+ SponsorBlock for YT).

    NoScript can be a pain to manage occasionally but even on pemit-all-by-default mode you can block some of the more ubiquitous insidious trackers like Google and Facebook without impacting your functionality at all.

  • @Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Linux: firefox/waterfox + uBlock + UnboundVPN on OpnSense Router (via wireguard if not at home) + YouTube premium (1$ a month payed via india)

    iOS: safari + 1Blocker(lifetime) + UnboundVPN on OpnSense Router (via wireguard if not at home) + YT premium (1$/month)

  • @gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    431 year ago

    extension design and strong content filters make AdBlock for Firefox a solid choice for people who don’t necessarily despise all ads

    Do these people exist and if so, have they been checked for brainworms?

    The rest is also stupid, ublock origin can and does block trackers, and can be made to block more stuff if you want. It’s strictly better in every way than the competition, which lets through more stuff, and/or sells your info. The article would be very short though if they just said that.

    • The Doctor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Either the article’s author has an editor who made the change, or the author knows what side his bread’s buttered on.

    • Tlaloc_Temporal
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I’m not opposed to allowing ads, but until there are enforceable limits it’s too risky. If a service that serves a malware ad or a scam ad risks its entire system being blocked across all sites, then maybe we could get somewhere.

      We’d need something like ad server whitelists and fast-acting disqualifications. No ad server anonymity or rapid name changes, no adding backdoors for your friends. If your break the guidelines, you loose the ability to do business anywhere for at least a day.

  • Archaeopteryx
    link
    fedilink
    271 year ago

    I also would vote for uBlock Origins. This is by far the best solution on the market. It blocks more than just ads and trackers. uBlock blocks also malware sites, popups, miners and other annoyances. Or you can also use it as an URL shortener tool to get rid of the tracking parameters in the URLs.

    Something I’ve also been looking at more closely for a few days now is Arkenfox to hardening my Firefox more effective. Does anyone here has some experiences with Arkenfox?

  • foremanguy
    link
    fedilink
    341 year ago

    You should only use Unlock Origin in my opinion… But I’m open to other propositions