Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year ago

there is no rule

lemmy.world

message-square
98
fedilink
230

there is no rule

lemmy.world

@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year ago
message-square
98
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3•
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    5, and any multiple of 5.

    • Jojo, Lady of the West
      link
      fedilink
      1•1 year ago

      5+1=6, not 5?

  • neoman4426
    link
    fedilink
    29•1 year ago

    So you’re saying there is one? Because the line that’s replaced here is Tighten saying “There’s no Queen of England” with the point of the scene being showing he’s dumb for thinking something that does exist is like the other mythological things listed

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28•1 year ago

      There hasn’t been a Queen of England since the Acts of Union when the title was replaced with Queen of Great Britain.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5•1 year ago

      I’ve only seen the memes.

      I thought that character was a she.

      Huh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2•1 year ago

        You should watch the movie. It’s all kinds of fun.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8•1 year ago

        This is a good opportunity to go watch megamind

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34•1 year ago

      there’s no Queen of England though, Titan was just ahead of his time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        10•1 year ago

        Omg he predicted her death???

        • SeekPie
          link
          fedilink
          1•1 year ago

          proxy-image

  • LousyCornMuffins
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13•1 year ago

    33550336 is pretty odd. look at those pairs. they must be fuckin.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech
      link
      fedilink
      6•1 year ago

      Amicable with benefits

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12•1 year ago

    13

    🖐️

    🎤

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24•1 year ago

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8•
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      31521281 = 11 × 17 × 59 × 2857

      11 × 17 = 187

      11 × 59 = 649

      11 × 2857 = 31427

      17 × 59 = 10003

      17 × 2857 = 48569

      59 × 2857 = 168563

      17 × 59 × 2857 = 2865571

      11 × 59 × 2857 = 1854193

      11 × 17 × 2857 = 534259

      11 × 17 × 59 = 11033

      11+17+59+2857+11033+534259+1854193+2865571+168563+ 48569+10003+31427+649+187=5527398≠31521281

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1•1 year ago

        What about 2^31521281 - 1, I’m pretty sure that’s a perfect odd number

      • Arthur Besse
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6•
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        17 × 59 = 10003

        you’ve got an extra zero in there, and you forgot the 1, but the rest of your divisors match my crude brute-force approach:

        >>> n=31521281
        >>> d = [ x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x ]
        >>> d
        [1, 11, 17, 59, 187, 649, 1003, 2857, 11033, 31427, 48569, 168563, 534259, 1854193, 2865571]
        >>> yours=list(map(int,"11+17+59+2857+11033+534259+1854193+2865571+168563+48569+10003+31427+649+187".split("+")))
        >>> set(yours) - set(d)
        {10003}
        >>> set(d) - set(yours)
        {1, 1003}
        >>> sum(d)
        5518399
        

        same conclusion though: 5518399 also ≠ 31521281

        bonus nonsense
        >>> isperfect = lambda n: n == sum(x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x)
        >>> [n for n in range(1, 10000) if isperfect(n)]
        [6, 28, 496, 8128]
        

        (from https://oeis.org/A000396 i see the next perfect number after 8128 is 33550336 which is too big for me to wait for the naive approach above to test…)

        more bonus nonsense
        >>> divisors_if_perfect = lambda n: n == sum(d:=[x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x]) and d
        >>> print("\n".join(f"{n:>5} == sum{tuple(d)}" for n in range(10000) if (d:=divisors_if_perfect(n))))
            6 == sum(1, 2, 3)
           28 == sum(1, 2, 4, 7, 14)
          496 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248)
         8128 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 127, 254, 508, 1016, 2032, 4064)
        
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5•1 year ago

    Prove it, i’ll wait ^^

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech
      link
      fedilink
      3•1 year ago

      While you’re at it, solve the “all perfect numbers end with a 6 or 8” conjecture.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6•1 year ago

      I have a proof, but this comment box is too small to contain it.

  • tb_
    link
    fedilink
    15•1 year ago

    In number theory, a perfect number is a positive integer that is equal to the sum of its positive proper divisors, that is, divisors excluding the number itself. For instance, 6 has proper divisors 1, 2 and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, so 6 is a perfect number. The next perfect number is 28, since 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14 = 28.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_number

  • BigDaddySlim
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10•1 year ago

    69: “am I a joke to you?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3•1 year ago

      69 is a Nice number.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8•1 year ago

      It’s ok 69. You’re perfect just the way you are <3

    • Jojo, Lady of the West
      link
      fedilink
      1•1 year ago

      I mean… Yes? Yes. Yes, right?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1•1 year ago

    Ty for checking my work.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13•1 year ago

    There is noodd.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6•1 year ago

      Send nooddz

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5•1 year ago

    Numerology is so weird

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2•1 year ago

      Perfect numbers are number theory not numerology

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2•1 year ago

        I mean kinda? We’re assigning importance to a neat coincidence.

        • Jojo, Lady of the West
          link
          fedilink
          2•1 year ago

          On the one hand, sure.

          On the other hand, a lot of significant things in math and science came about because someone noticed and then studied a neat coincidence.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1•1 year ago

            Maybe it’s just a nomenclature thing for me. Calling it a perfect number makes me think of the dudes in Pi.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41•1 year ago

    5

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34•1 year ago

      The honorary even number.

    • Jojo, Lady of the West
      link
      fedilink
      1•1 year ago

      1+5=6 tho?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5•1 year ago

    noodd

    • LoudWaterHombre
      link
      fedilink
      1•1 year ago

      He probably nod his head a little to much

      https://piped.video/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA

      • LoudWaterHombre
        link
        fedilink
        1•1 year ago

        Here is an alternative YouTube link(s):

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA

        YouTube is a privacy-disrespecting closed-source alternative frontend to Piped.

        I’m a sack of flesh; check me out at kbin or [email protected]

        • @[email protected]B
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1•1 year ago

          Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

          https://www.piped.video/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA

          Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

          I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

          • LoudWaterHombre
            link
            fedilink
            1•1 year ago

            Here is an alternative YouTube link(s):

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA

            YouTube is a privacy-disrespecting closed-source alternative frontend to Piped.

            I’m a sack of flesh; check me out at kbin or [email protected]

            • @[email protected]B
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1•1 year ago

              Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

              https://www.piped.video/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA

              Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

              I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

              • LoudWaterHombre
                link
                fedilink
                1•1 year ago

                Here is an alternative YouTube link(s):

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA

                YouTube is a privacy-disrespecting closed-source alternative frontend to Piped.

                I’m a sack of flesh; check me out at kbin or [email protected]

                • @[email protected]B
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1•1 year ago

                  Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

                  https://www.piped.video/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA

                  Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

                  I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

        • Jojo, Lady of the West
          link
          fedilink
          1•1 year ago

          😂

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2•1 year ago

    https://youtu.be/Q53GmMCqmAM

    • @[email protected]B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1•1 year ago

      Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

      https://piped.video/Q53GmMCqmAM

      Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

      I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
  • No genocide denial
  • No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
  • No namecalling
  • Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
  • Other things seen as cleary bad

Posting rules:

  • No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
  • No advertisements
  • No gore / violence
  • Mutual aid posts are not allowed

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn’t adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196’s:

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • 2 users / day
  • 146 users / week
  • 556 users / month
  • 4.17K users / 6 months
  • 5 subscribers
  • 18.5K Posts
  • 223K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Moss
  • @[email protected]
  • moss
  • Queue
  • funky-rodent [he/him]
  • Peachy [they/she]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • Roflmasterbigpimp
  • @[email protected]
  • qaz
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • qaz
  • @[email protected]
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org