5, and any multiple of 5.
5+1=6, not 5?
So you’re saying there is one? Because the line that’s replaced here is Tighten saying “There’s no Queen of England” with the point of the scene being showing he’s dumb for thinking something that does exist is like the other mythological things listed
There hasn’t been a Queen of England since the Acts of Union when the title was replaced with Queen of Great Britain.
I’ve only seen the memes.
I thought that character was a she.
Huh.
You should watch the movie. It’s all kinds of fun.
This is a good opportunity to go watch megamind
there’s no Queen of England though, Titan was just ahead of his time.
Omg he predicted her death???
33550336 is pretty odd. look at those pairs. they must be fuckin.
Amicable with benefits
13
🖐️
🎤
31521281 = 11 × 17 × 59 × 2857
11 × 17 = 187
11 × 59 = 649
11 × 2857 = 31427
17 × 59 = 10003
17 × 2857 = 48569
59 × 2857 = 168563
17 × 59 × 2857 = 2865571
11 × 59 × 2857 = 1854193
11 × 17 × 2857 = 534259
11 × 17 × 59 = 11033
11+17+59+2857+11033+534259+1854193+2865571+168563+ 48569+10003+31427+649+187=5527398≠31521281
What about 2^31521281 - 1, I’m pretty sure that’s a perfect odd number
17 × 59 = 10003
you’ve got an extra zero in there, and you forgot the 1, but the rest of your divisors match my crude brute-force approach:
>>> n=31521281 >>> d = [ x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x ] >>> d [1, 11, 17, 59, 187, 649, 1003, 2857, 11033, 31427, 48569, 168563, 534259, 1854193, 2865571] >>> yours=list(map(int,"11+17+59+2857+11033+534259+1854193+2865571+168563+48569+10003+31427+649+187".split("+"))) >>> set(yours) - set(d) {10003} >>> set(d) - set(yours) {1, 1003} >>> sum(d) 5518399same conclusion though: 5518399 also ≠ 31521281
bonus nonsense
>>> isperfect = lambda n: n == sum(x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x) >>> [n for n in range(1, 10000) if isperfect(n)] [6, 28, 496, 8128](from https://oeis.org/A000396 i see the next perfect number after 8128 is 33550336 which is too big for me to wait for the naive approach above to test…)
more bonus nonsense
>>> divisors_if_perfect = lambda n: n == sum(d:=[x for x in range(1,n//2+1) if not n%x]) and d >>> print("\n".join(f"{n:>5} == sum{tuple(d)}" for n in range(10000) if (d:=divisors_if_perfect(n)))) 6 == sum(1, 2, 3) 28 == sum(1, 2, 4, 7, 14) 496 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 31, 62, 124, 248) 8128 == sum(1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 127, 254, 508, 1016, 2032, 4064)
Prove it, i’ll wait ^^
While you’re at it, solve the “all perfect numbers end with a 6 or 8” conjecture.
I have a proof, but this comment box is too small to contain it.
In number theory, a perfect number is a positive integer that is equal to the sum of its positive proper divisors, that is, divisors excluding the number itself. For instance, 6 has proper divisors 1, 2 and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, so 6 is a perfect number. The next perfect number is 28, since 1 + 2 + 4 + 7 + 14 = 28.
69: “am I a joke to you?”
69 is a Nice number.
It’s ok 69. You’re perfect just the way you are <3
I mean… Yes? Yes. Yes, right?
Ty for checking my work.
There is noodd.
Send nooddz
Numerology is so weird
Perfect numbers are number theory not numerology
I mean kinda? We’re assigning importance to a neat coincidence.
On the one hand, sure.
On the other hand, a lot of significant things in math and science came about because someone noticed and then studied a neat coincidence.
Maybe it’s just a nomenclature thing for me. Calling it a perfect number makes me think of the dudes in Pi.
5
The honorary even number.
1+5=6 tho?
noodd
He probably nod his head a little to much
Here is an alternative YouTube link(s):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA
YouTube is a privacy-disrespecting closed-source alternative frontend to Piped.
I’m a sack of flesh; check me out at kbin or [email protected]
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Here is an alternative YouTube link(s):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA
YouTube is a privacy-disrespecting closed-source alternative frontend to Piped.
I’m a sack of flesh; check me out at kbin or [email protected]
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Here is an alternative YouTube link(s):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA
YouTube is a privacy-disrespecting closed-source alternative frontend to Piped.
I’m a sack of flesh; check me out at kbin or [email protected]
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=1RVRCd6J2NA
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
😂
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/Q53GmMCqmAM
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
