• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1010 months ago

    I wonder how long it will be before they start giving discounts on tickets for interacting with the ads a certain number of times during the flight.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      Never. The whole ad craze is there to milk profits on top of the things you already paid for.

      What you are suggesting would actually be a more fair system.

      Free with ads or paid with no ads.

      Asshole corporations want paid and ads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    Most people will be too busy with their laptops, tablets, and phones to pay any attention to whatever ads they put on those screens.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        It certainly wouldn’t be OK for anyone that actually wants to use the in flight entertainment. I watch whatever TV shows and movies that I downloaded ad free and never turn on the seat back screens.

  • hopesdead
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I already dislike the experience of being with other passengers on United. Nothing negative occurred on my part, just noticed how badly behaved other passengers were compared to every other airline I’ve flown.

    My point is, I wouldn’t pick United to fly as my first choice.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    60
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    fuck with the algorithm make it show ads for porno and then they’ll stop doing it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2910 months ago

      I assume they won’t allow porns in ads, but you can still get worse stuff than porn, like erectile dysfunction medication ads which causes people around your seat to look at you with sorry eyes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah, this is going to be hell for flight attendants having to deal with rightfully upset passengers.

  • Brownian Motion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2410 months ago

    Nothing that some Self Adhesive Vinyl can’t fix. They’ll have to deal with getting it off the screen afterwards too. Want to fine me for it? Then tell me where you got the data, because I didn’t consent to you having my data.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1610 months ago

      Calling into United:

      Hey I see you charged me $400 for a replacement screen? Tell me, where did you buy the targeted ad data you used to display ads on that screen? Oh, an agency that I signed terms and conditions for at some point? Shit, alright then.

      I mean, fuck United tho and they will not be getting and damn money from me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        In david and goliath, david won. In the tortoise and the hare, the tortoise won. Rey Mysterio vs the 2006 Royal Rumble, Rey Mysterio won.

        Hmmmm, you may be onto something!

  • ME5SENGER_24
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5310 months ago

    More to consider when selecting an airline. Greedy fuckers, I hope their stock takes a nosedive thanks to this

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2810 months ago

      It’ll probably take a small dip and then rise quite a bit once profits from implementing it start rolling in

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        And if it succesful, or at least passenger doesn’t boycott them over it, it is just a question of time until other airlines adds it as well

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Part of the problem is that UA is such a massive airline, odds are any alternatives would involve quite a bit of sacrifice. Not many people would be willing or can afford to take an extra 2 layovers or 50%+ extra travel time or cost in order to get to where they want to go 🫤 That’s not to say I won’t try my best to avoid UA though, I was already sick of them after my last trip and now I find this news.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        Seriously. It’s nearly a sure thing. I should buy on Monday and see how it goes. People are sleepwalking about adtech shit so they’ll continue to fly United. There’s already a dude in this thread telling people to chill and just don’t fly if they don’t like it. The ad revenue should be pretty juicy, too. They have a bored captive audience identified by full name and credit card number.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8310 months ago

    Targeted, individualized, advertising should be illegal. This will gut a lot of the motivations for the privacy invasions and data harvesting. This is how advertising worked for thousands of years. I think it could continue to be just fine.

    The amount of resources humanity is spending on targeted advertising is extremely depressing when you consider the opportunity cost. There are thousands of engineers and product managers that spend all day on this stuff instead of anything useful.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1510 months ago

      Their seats did that for me. I’m 5’11", not a giant, and my knees were straight up jammed into the seat in front of me. Completely insane that they’re even legally allowed to sell those to people as seats. They might fit a child.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        What did it for me was a long delay that got me landed at my destination after car rental was closed

        Not so much the delay itself; that upset me, but I get that things happen

        It was the reason for the delay: a simple maintenance thing with the plane had them taking the engine further and further apart while we watched from the terminal, ultimately deciding they weren’t getting this thing back up and running again anytime soon and having to get us another plane (which we had to wait for to fly to us)

        Why couldn’t they figure it out? Because they didn’t have anyone who knew how to work on that plane model available

        There are so many ways that pisses me off and makes me never want to trust them again

        Also, every flight I had with them, including the return trip that I’d already booked from that trip, was miserable

        Say what you will about Southwest but they know their damned planes inside and out and overall run their fleet efficiently and consistently. It’s like riding a bus that flies

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The median age for an A&P licensed plane tech is 55. We’ll welcome you to the ranks anytime.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            I have no idea what it is you’re trying to say here or how it relates to an airline running planes without having maintenance crews that can actually do the work on them… And that they worked on it anyway without apparently having the required training for it…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              This comment directly speaks to your lack of understanding of how airline maintenance works. The point though is there are a shortage of maintenance personnel in the industry. People are retiring all the time and nobody is filling those billets once they leave. And airlines don’t just have a maintenance crew at every airport because there’s not enough, and it wouldn’t be cost effective. Be as angry as you want that airlines are running on such terrible margins that they can’t have a backup plane. But do understand that this is not the fault of the maintenance personnel.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                710 months ago

                Who’s blaming the maintenance personnel? I’m expecting the airlines to actually have their maintenance crews trained for the planes they fly.

                I don’t think this is a particularly unrealistic expectation.

                Nor do I think the expectation that crews without enough training on a plane to tear its engine apart and put it back together not be tasked with something that will have them tearing the engine apart.

                I don’t need to understand how the maintenance works to expect it be done correctly for something that’s going to be moving my ass at hundreds of miles per hour, thousands of feet in the air.

                I don’t blame the maintenance personnel for not giving themselves adequate training on the machines they’ll be servicing; that’s on the airlines to ensure they get that before telling them to work on those planes. I don’t blame the maintenance personnel for being ordered to then work on planes they don’t have training on.

                And if “that’s just how the industry is”, that doesn’t make it any better.

                Either way, flying with an airline that runs basically one model and can ensure every maintenance person knows that plane and every pilot knows that plane seems a good way to avoid the issue, so I’ll stick with what I’ve got for now, thanks.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Did it ever occur to you that they don’t just have maintenance personnel at every airport? Because what I’m saying is that no airline in the world has maintenance personnel at every airport.

                  Spirit, Frontier and Allegiant are Airbus only and would require an Airbus tech. Airbus planes are pretty decent on that the A19-A321 planes are pretty much exactly the same in parts and configuration except that some are longer and or wider than others. On the other side of things Southwest has only Boeing planes, mostly 737 and 747.

                  Pretty much every other airline has a mix of different planes (Boeing, Airbus, and Bombardier, Embraer). To do what you’re talking about every airline that flies more than one plane would have to have a technician for each of those plane types on the ground at every airport they fly to. That’s 5000 airports, with at least two technicians per airport (assuming they only have one flight in and out of there at a time which is ludicrous). The average number of flights going in and out of any one airport at a time. Daily there are about 45,000 flights per day per FAA statistics not including private flights.

                  At Delta’s hub in Atlanta, there are around 2100-2700 flights per day. Delta says they have about 6,400 AMT’s worldwide One singular airport out of 242 airports that Delta flies to. 24 hours a day for most airports. They would be required to keep at least 8 people per airport per average number of flights leaving or arriving per at the same time. Let’s say that at their hub they only have 5 planes on the ground at any given time ( a gross miscalculation of how many planes fly into their hub, but the math is cleaner). Delta has 4 different plane manufacturers’s planes in their fleet. That’s 4 mechanics on an 8 or 12 hour shift multiplied by 5 planes let’s say per average turn around time of 30 minutes. You’d need 20 techs At every single solitary airport Delta flies to. Per shift. Supplied by the airline. It’s a logistical nightmare and this number balloons when you realise just how.many departures and arrivals there are and at what intervals at pretty much any major airport. 9,640 AMT’s assuming 12 hour shifts. Just for domestic USA flights, not including planes that are down for maintenance outside regular maintenance schedule. When the fleet only emplyes 6,400 AMT’s world wide.

                  I cannot stress this enough, but you’re making a lot of assumptions here. And you don’t think it’s an unrealistic expectation specifically because you have no idea how any of this works.

  • MushuChupacabra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22310 months ago

    For those of you contemplating ways of covering up the ads:

    This is the same airline that beat the shit out of that doctor because the airline overbooked the flight. For your own safety, do not cross this airline.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1910 months ago

      I got screeched at for covering up a super bright blinking light on a red eye. Their FAs are next level stupid.

    • -☂️-
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2910 months ago

      i think we should make them afraid to cross us

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1910 months ago

          Holy shit what a ride that was.

          It’s clear from a lot of stories like this (severe customer mistreatment) that United employees are miserable people who hate their jobs but this is nuts. I hope Dr. Dao got a huge settlement from United.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1010 months ago

            Is United Express actually United? I thought those tended to be a regional carrier using the name under license.

            I’d expect the labour friction to be still worse; I was peripherally involved with such a firm 20 years ago and know they had terrible problems with staff retention, mostly because they wouldn’t pay enough to retain people after they got fed up with the free-standby-flight privileges.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Wow. Even Trump thought they went too far. Damn.

          And the CEO who brushed that assault off ‘suffered’ a ‘delayed promotion’. Poor thing. For saying that stuff about anyone, let alone a customer, he should have been fired, no golden parachute.

          I think the doctor’s patients should have sued the airline too, since no doubt having their doctor pounded to a pulp caused them to miss their appointments.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8510 months ago

          “The incident is widely characterized by critics as an example of mishandled customer service.”

          Made me laugh, that’s putting it lightly…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1610 months ago

            “The incident is widely characterized by critics as an example of mishandled manhandled customer service.”

            Just a typo.

      • SkaveRat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4710 months ago

        he wasn’t white, so they didn’t assume he was a doctor

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “If you don’t like it don’t fly”

        Seriously just shut up.

        Edit: LMAO just saw your other comment where you actually said this sincerely. You’re a parody of yourself.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          You can, there’s a button combo. It changes sometimes but if you spam a few things I can always black it out

          But that’s not the point, it still sucks

      • Drusas
        link
        fedilink
        2910 months ago

        Have you ever turned a screen off on one of these planes? They turn back on. So you turn them off again. Sooner or later, they turn back on. And repeat.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2010 months ago

            People like you constantly give corporations an inch because “it’s not a big deal” and here we are.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            510 months ago

            Depends on the plane and system it has. Last United flight I was on it stayed off the entire flight. I use my phone and generally don’t look at it anyway but it was nicer I suppose.

          • Drusas
            link
            fedilink
            1710 months ago

            I don’t think you’re being beaten up for it. I certainly am not beating you up for it. But usually, yeah, the screen does come back on during the flight. I think they turn it back on automatically every time there’s an announcement. As somebody who finds screens like that very distracting and even migraine-inducing (the “busyness” of that sort of thing is a big trigger), it’s really frustrating.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            I honestly couldn’t care less how many adverts they show me, they can have a constant stream of adverts the whole flight if it means that some shitty corporation is paying a portion of my travel coats.

            People really need to grow up about stuff like this, if you don’t want adverts then pay for a premium service - I’m poor, I’ll accept the adverts.

            • wagoner
              link
              fedilink
              English
              910 months ago

              That money isn’t subsidizing your flight cost, it’s increasing corporate profits.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              610 months ago

              Here’s the thing: companies have learned they can add ads to make additional money without passing any of that on to their customers.

              If you think you’re going to get a better rate for having ads, you’re fooling yourself. They’ll always charge as much as they can get people to pay and that amount isn’t affected by ads most of the time.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                This is thinking based on emotion not reality, most of the internet is free because of adverts so your belief that it’s not used to lower prices is clearly silly. Yes companies love profit but they often increase profits by lowering prices to attract more business, it’s a perfectly valid business model to use adverts to reduce the cost to the customer and increase customer volume.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 months ago

      Overbooking should be a mandatory minimum compensation of the greater of 1000x the ticket price or $20k. It’s a truly fucked up practice to disrespect people’s time like that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5410 months ago

      The Chicago Department of Aviation did that. The same way if the police ends up killing someone, it was not the person calling the police.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1010 months ago

        it was not the person calling the police.

        At this point anyone calling the police in the US is a necessary accomplice, and guilty of conspiracy to commit murder, aggravated battery, and probably several other crimes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        United was booting passengers to make room for employee transfers though, the situation was shit before dept of aviation even got the call.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1310 months ago

          Those employees could have stood. Frontier and Spirit give vouchers out when they intentionally overbook…which before the pandemic was everyday. If nobody takes the bait, they up the voucher value. For them it’s essentially monopoly money.

          If United couldn’t get anybody to bite at the vouchers, then the employees should have stood the whole flight. Instead, they beat a man who was not fighting back physically. He only insisted that he get to his patient. They LITERALLY dragged him off the plane. By his ankle, as he tried to grab onto anything he could.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1010 months ago

            If United couldn’t get anybody to bite at the vouchers, then the employees should have stood the whole flight.

            Yeah, that is not a solution. The FAA is salivating at the thought of this. Everyone must have a seat for takeoff and landing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          Sure, but telling someone to leave their plane for some oddball reason is “only bad” not outright crazy like what happened then.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2510 months ago

    “weird, yeah I got here and this screen just had all this sharpie over it, i dunno how it happened”

  • Cosmo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3110 months ago

    The thing I hate is that all these airline screens usually default to “on”, and people tend to leave defaults. I’m a tall person, and can usually see a large number of the screens in front of me. So if I’m on a night flight, even if I don’t intend to sleep, the only way to not be blinded by dozens of ads for a few hours is to bring a sleep mask.

    • Boozilla
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2710 months ago

      I feel so bad for tall people on planes. It’s uncomfortable AF for all of us, but you guys have to become human origami just to sit. It’s insane that this shit is legal. I avoid flying as much as possible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        It’s uncomfortable AF for all of us

        Idk, I’m pretty comfortable on planes, and I’m around 5’8 lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        I’m tall and fat it’s a double whammy. Granted one I’ve done to myself, luckily I generally only fly with my wife so I can get the isle seat to stretch

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Also, ths taller you are, the more likely you are to be seriously injured in severe turbulence, malfunctions, minor crashes and major crashes.

    • Drusas
      link
      fedilink
      710 months ago

      They also automatically turn the screens back on repeatedly after you turn them off.