Image is of Cuba’s National People’s Power Assembly.


The most recent geopolitical news around Cuba is the arrival this week of four Russian vessels, including a nuclear submarine - not carrying any nukes, (un)fortunately - to Havana. This will, in Putin’s words, merely be a visit celebrating historical ties and no laws are being broken. Nonetheless, it’s not hard to imagine how American politicians and analysts are taking the news, especially as it comes shortly after Russia promised an “asymmetrical” response to further NATO involvement in Ukraine (notably, officially allowing the use of US weapons such as missiles in Russia, albeit in a small part of Russian territory, near the border).

Meanwhile, China has been increasingly co-operating with Cuba to overcome the economic hardship created by American sanctions. China has recently re-allowed direct flights to Cuba and has recently donated some small photovoltaic plants as part of an initiative to eventually boost the Cuban energy grid by 1000 MW - and any electrical expansion helps as Cuba is plagued by blackouts which last most of the day. Additionally, the EU has made meaningful contributions to Cuba’s energy situation too, with large solar installations. Hopefully, the Belt and Road Initiative will help preserve the Cuban revolution against reactionary forces as the power of US sanctions wanes. The proximity of Cuba to the United States makes this much more challenging than it would be for countries elsewhere, however. Similarly to the situation in Mexico, it seems unlikely that the US’s influence over Cuba will massively diminish for decades to come unless there is a catastrophic internal collapse in the American authoritarian regime.

The Havana Syndrome will continue until American morale declines.


The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you’ve wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don’t worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.

The Country of the Week is Cuba! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • Greenleaf [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    731 year ago

    The War is Costing the Israeli Economy $600M a Week Due to Absences of Palestinian Workers

    The ongoing war between Israel and Hamas has laid bare the Israeli economy’s heavy reliance on Palestinian labor, with the absence of these workers costing the Israeli economy an estimated $600 million per week, equivalent to about 6% of its weekly GDP.

    Prior to the outbreak of hostilities on October 7, 2023, around 100,000 Palestinians from the West Bank held permits to work in Israel, primarily in construction and agriculture. However, shortly after the initial Hamas attacks, Israel restricted entry for these Palestinian employees.

    To fill the gaps, Israel has recruited workers from India and Sri Lanka, but the labor shortages have still taken a major toll. In Q4 2023, the Israeli economy contracted by 19.4% compared to the same period in 2022, the biggest drop in nearly four years. Private consumption plunged 26.9%, business investment fell 67.8%, and exports declined 18.3%

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    In Ukraine - Russia war news:

    The Ukrainians seem to be committing to their asymmetric strategy, they know that they can’t beat Russia on the frontlines, so Ukraine is launching an increased amount of attacks against high value targets within Russia. One of the most significant of these is the loss of a Russian Su-57 5th generation stealth fighter jet while it was on the ground, as confirmed by Russian telegrams. It is the first combat loss of a 5th generation fighter aircraft in history, and Russia currently only has a handful of Su-57s that are operational, so a very costly loss. It was unprotected on a runway, and not in a concrete hangar, which is a major oversight from Russia.

    In general Russian aviation has lost quite a few high value aircraft throughout the war, both to friendly and enemy fire, including an Su-34 NVO to friendly fire at the beginning of the war (one of only 10, and one of the few fully capable SEAD and EW aircraft at Russia’s disposal), and the suspected loss of various AWACS jets both to enemy and friendly fire, and the loss of the Mach 3 capable MIG 31 aircraft, which were also on the ground and unprotected while they were bombed. The Su-57 loss has a tactical impact, as Russia has made extensive use recently of the stealth kh-69 cruise missiles, which the stealthy Su-57 can carry deep into Ukrainian territory to extend their effective range, due to it’s own stealth capabilities, to enable strikes on power infrastructure deep in Western Ukraine. A double stealth 1-2 punch. However multiple fighter jets in the Russian Air Force can carry the kh-69. The recent MIG 31 losses also have an impact, it is the only normal sized fighter plane/non bomber that can carry the Kinzhal, and flies to high and fast for most Ukrainian air defences to shoot down.

    All in all these losses will not change the trajectory of the war or the reality of the frontlines where Ukraine has no answer to Russia, and losses are to be expected, but it does show that Russian aviation’s doctrine is well behind battlefield realities. The lack of proper SEAD/EW aircraft and outdated SEAD/DEAD doctrine, the failure to build protective hangars to protect high value aircraft, and friendly fire incidents are not things an air force of Russia’s size should struggle with. It’s almost as if there has been no modernisation since the end of the cold war.

    • rio [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      It was unprotected on a runway, and not in a concrete hangar, which is a major oversight from Russia.

      Outright insane that this is true.

      Even in peacetime, why not put it in a shed?

      If you owned a $30 million car, you wouldn’t park it outside no matter how nice the neighborhood.

      Insane.

      • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        281 year ago

        I mean it’s publicly available satellite and drone imagery, sadly we don’t have access to the super spy satellites China, Russia and the USA have that can take a photograph of a pimple from space.

        • RyanGosling [none/use name]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          lol Washington isn’t providing Ukraine with their satellite imagery? Or are they prohibiting it from being shown publicly? I know Trump got a bunch of heat from liberals because he exposed some satellite photo

      • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        30
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean leaving such valuable aircraft out in the open is just terrible tactics from Russian aviation. Surely a concrete hangar would be much cheaper than an Su-57.

        • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]OPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          the more demonstrative kicks up the ass Russia gets before a potential conflict with NATO, the better. Russia seems to be much better at learning how to solve problems once they’ve already happened and less good at coming up with preemptive solutions, so you get one big costly failure and then it rarely happens again. seems to me that it indicates a fairly rigid military structure where advice doesn’t percolate upwards quickly, but it functions well enough on the day-to-day. at least it’s better than the West, which experiences a dozen big costly failures and then designs a quadrillion dollar missile which is meant to solve that problem forever and then it turns out that missile can’t even get off the ground or whatever and then there’s a dozen more big costly failures and then a withdrawal

          some doctrines have to be written in blood

          • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            191 year ago

            When you really boil it down, the Russian military’s purpose is to do military actions, whereas the US military’s purpose is to funnel money into the military industrial complex

            • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]OPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              absolutely

              for example: while I do think the line of “NATO isn’t a defensive alliance, it’s an offensive alliance” is relatively effective and isn’t strictly wrong, I do think it’s a little misleading to portray NATO like that.

              it’s a little like being critical of US imperialism and wars in the Middle East, but framing that in terms of “we didn’t invade Iraq and Afghanistan for democracy and freedom, we did it for oil/mineral wealth!” again, there might indeed have been some corporations that really wanted that oil and minerals, and framing it like the US is evil for wanting loot and plunder rather than a moral global order is more or less how US imperialism functions on the day-to-day basis of exploitation of underdeveloped countries, but like - the US already has a shitload of fossil fuels and minerals.

              rather, I think it’s worth stressing that NATO’s primary purpose (post-USSR, at least) is to provide an exclusive market for the American military-industrial complex, and it being, y’know, an actual military alliance is really its secondary role. because flipping the primary and secondary purposes around, while sounding principled and anti-militarist and anti-imperialist, fails to really get at the heart of the engine of American imperialism and how the empire truly functions, because the US isn’t at war with everybody, all the time, nor threatening to be. 98% of the time, it’s just the grinding gears of exploitation and capital accumulation and striking down any reforms. the US has done an awful lot of warring over the last century or so, but the wars are not the empire. the enforced dollar currency and the debt and the capitalists backed by soft power and intelligence agencies are the empire. the wars are just what happens when a country refuses to accept that empire.

              and in the “US invading the Middle East for oil” case, I similarly think it’s much more complete and explanatory to frame it as “the US invaded the Middle East to disrupt any potential anti-hegemonic power forming in the region, and invaded Afghanistan especially due to its proximity to Russia and China, as well as more general military-industrial complex profiteering.” but obviously the reason why libs would be unable to accept this framing is because they agree that China and Russia are bad and must be stopped by any means, but still want to be regarded as pseudo-anti-imperialists against the Bush administration. so “it wasn’t freedom and democracy, it was just oil! haha funny joke about how I spilled some oil in my kitchen and now America wants to invade me!” remains the prevailing narrative to comfort the libs.

              • RyanGosling [none/use name]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                and invaded Afghanistan especially due to its proximity to Russia and China

                I remember reading one of the reports post-9/11, either from the investigation report or some report justifying the subsequent invasions, that they specifically cited China’s proximity to the Middle East as being a valuable asset to take advantage of even though nominally they’re trying to fight Osama lol

              • SoyViking [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                Good post. There’s also some good agitation potential in that realisation. “The West is evil” is a true statement but it is hard to swallow for soft squishy liberals. “Taxpayer dollars is being wasted to buy overpriced junk that doesn’t even work that well” is a message that has a wider audience and that can prepare listeners to accepting the message about imperialism.

                • RyanGosling [none/use name]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  is a message that has a wider audience and that can prepare listeners to accepting the message about imperialism.

                  Perhaps. But it can also naturally lead to the conclusion of “you’re right. We need to make more effective weapons and impose austerity to lower government spending”

              • ziggurter [he/him, comrade/them]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Hmm. Well, I think the synthesis is that there’s no conflict between oil and hegemony. Really the oil is a major mechanism of hegemony. As we are seeing play out in Europe right now, and saw in Ukraine with the separation from Russian fossil fuels (esp. gas) prior.

                The problem when people say “it’s JUST about oil” is that they don’t know what “oil” really means and refuse to look deeper.

                I kinda disagree with the notion that NATO isn’t at war/threatening everyone, at least to some degree. The thousand or so U.S. military bases around the world (plus all the “guest” U.S. military presence in bases which aren’t technically owned by the U.S./NATO) are absolutely a threat; a constant reminder that if the “hosting” (or a nearby) country thinks it can step out of line, it is a very, very short “hard power” leash they are on. Glen Ford of Black Agenda Report has done some really good talks/articles about this.

  • Al_Sham [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1031 year ago

    Decades-Long Conspiracy Unveiled: Sabotage of Yemen’s Agriculture

    Yemen has the highest rate of food insecurity of any country in the world. And the US and UK have been using biological weapons to sabotage their agricultural industry under the guise of “Aid.”

    CIA-linked members confessed to orchestrating these actions, with involvement from British and Dutch embassies. Key actors like the US Department of Agriculture and the FAO were implicated, with USAID’s pivotal role dating back to the late 1980s.

    Local USAID operatives outside Yemen continue gathering intel, obstructing advancements in agricultural practices. A Seed Center for Seed Inspection facilitated the entry of inferior seeds, some infected with pests, while spiny weeds were spread instead of vegetable seeds.

    USAID targeted fertile soil with contaminated seeds, aiming to render it unsuitable for cultivation, alongside spreading scale insects to hinder wheat production. Spy Shayef al-Hamdani confirmed USAID’s role in spreading epidemics among agricultural crops under the pretext of pest control. USAID’s interventions were carried out through implementing partners, including international organizations, spreading epidemics in specific crops under the guise of controlling pests. USAID played a pivotal role in executing these plans through its operatives both within and outside Yemen.

  • mushroom [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    461 year ago

    Armed conflicts hit post-WWII record in 2023

    More armed conflicts took place in 2023 than in any other year since the end of World War II, a new study has found. The Peace Research Institute of Oslo (PRIO) said 59 armed conflicts took place worldwide last year, led by the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. Twenty-eight of the conflicts were in Africa, followed by Asia with 17 and the Middle East with 10. Just three conflicts were recorded in Europe and a single example in the Americas. Although the number of conflicts grew last year, the number of countries that experienced conflicts declined from 39 in 2022 to 34.

    Peace Research Institute of Oslo sounds like a typical western scam NGO but i haven’t actually looked into them. even if it isn’t 100% accurate it does feel like the amount of violence around the globe has been increasing, and with climate change and declining capitalism/american imperial position i worry it’s gonna get worse before it gets better

  • Zodiark [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    781 year ago

    I kind of noticed that westerners treat the oppressed as non existent entities, or ghosts.

  • rio [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wild speculation time:

    Something about Macron’s troop deployments seems very performative.

    Perhaps performative in the more obvious sense that he wants to boil the frog and sending in “trainers and advisers” is the thin end of the wedge before sending in troops to make NATO intervention in Ukraine a fait accompli.

    But what if it’s performative in another way?

    We all know what the outcome of this war looks like. Russia takes the eastern provinces and maybe more, perhaps up to the Dnieper in the south but probably not that far in the north, probably also takes Cherson but probably not Odessa, and maybe Kharkiv maybe not, depending on how good a resistance Ukraine puts up before the negotiations really start. Ukraine won’t be allowed to join NATO and no NATO bases but probably will be allowed to have some security guarantees with the major western players and perhaps even a relationship with NATO that stops short of allowing forward deployments.

    So a few significant uncertainties, sure, but the broad shape of it is clear now.

    Zelenskyy probably needs to go before this deal can really happen, and there would need to be some force that the Ukrainian public trusts that can prevent the Nazi faction from simply installing another Zelenskyy.

    France is in conflict with Russia and has lost out big in Africa and is being poked in the eye in New Caledonia, but is also hitting back to some extent in Armenia.

    The UK is a wreckage and Germany is not very strong. Poland is already taking an antagonistic posture towards Ukraine that will probably only get worse especially after the conflict is over and Ukraine has a settlement with Russia.

    We don’t need to talk about Italy or Spain or anyone else in Europe.

    Leaving France.

    They are hostile to Russia and engaged in an active “great game”.

    But this great game has at least some ground rules and operates mostly as a struggle over spheres of influence while respecting national borders. It’s constrained great power shit between two second tier military powers.

    Germany would continue to be the US’s most loyal dog in Europe and will lead the Central European & Baltic alliance, funding strong defensive works but also putting the brakes on the more rabid Russophobia because Germany even today is against actually getting directly involved in shit and definitely against doing anything that isn’t preapproved by Washington.

    France as the regional power delegated control of the rump Ukrainian state would be advantageous to the US by keeping Europe still split between two deeply linked but identifiably distinct power blocs, it would place a power hostile to Russia as the designated subhegemon in southern Eastern Europe and would complement French influence in Armenia to a degree by inserting France into the Black Sea making it the obvious choice for Georgia if Georgia decides to throw down again or in the event of another color revolution. And France has at least historical links with the general region, having recently been a colonial power in the area and having shoved its Gallic nose into the Middle East again and again since the crusades.

    France as subhegemon in a rump Ukraine would be an adversary to Russia, but still it would probably be acceptable to Russia to divide Ukraine into two spheres of control, assuming that Russia does not want or cannot occupy all of Ukraine - or both it doesn’t want and actually cannot occupy all of Ukraine which seems to be the case in fact.

    So assuming Russia will realpolitik this and accept it both cannot and strategically should not occupy all of Ukraine then it needs to accept that rump Ukraine will be within the western sphere of influence.

    And if they don’t want that sphere of influence to be NATO itself, and since they likely both cannot and don’t want to completely dominate Ukraine militarily, then they need to accept some kind of western presence / sphere of influence that stops short of NATO.

    What’s more while France is definitely a dog of the US empire, it’s a bit of a Husky. It doesn’t like to do what it’s told. It’s not Germany and will prioritize French interests over US interests, which makes it a good compromise position for Russia since a French presence is Ukraine is actually very different to a NATO presence in Ukraine while still being a western anchor. It also doesn’t hurt that Macron does the same macho bullshit that Putin does and they speak a similar language.

    French “advisers” in Ukraine could fairly quickly gain key influence over the military and promote the more pragmatic military faction to force the hard nationalists to accept a compromise and they would be a friend of Ukraine while doing it.

    Escalation from “just a few dozen advisers” to actual boots on the ground is a process that will take at least the rest of this year and into next, which is also when the new round of western military aid will start to run out, meaning this is the window for Ukraine to cut a deal.

    6-12 months to cut a deal, a suitable western subhegemon that will reliably maintain hostility to Russia while still playing the “great game” and accepting realist compromise in a rules-of-the-jungle based world order.

    Acceptable to Russia as preferable to nato, acceptable to the US, acceptable to Ukraine as saviors. Choreographed.

    • mkultrawide [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Zelenskyy probably needs to go before this deal can really happen, and there would need to be some force that the Ukrainian public trusts that can prevent the Nazi faction from simply installing another Zelenskyy.

      My reading is the opposite: someone is going to have to deal with those Nazis before a peace deal gets signed. I think you could get Zelenskyy to the table today if he wasn’t probably scared of getting domed by Banderites for making peace and “stabbing Ukraine in the back”.

  • take_five_seconds [he/him, any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    omg joe frenchmiddlename corncob butass hugged his (alleged) son who is a FELON and also maybe didnt’ fill out paperwork correctly! press like if ur a real patriot who smokes crack every 20 minutes (the objective correct amount of time between crack smoking sessions)

    edit: i’ve edited this like 7 times just adding more unhinged shit don’t mind me who knows whats real anymore

  • Redcuban1959 [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    531 year ago

    To stop the far right, France’s leftist parties come to agreement for legislative elections and announce union: “Popular Front”. “A page in the history of France is being written with the New Popular Front”, say the parties in a joint statement.

    François Hollande, former president of France, celebrates unity of the left in the legislative elections: “To prevent the far right from coming to power, there comes a time when we must go beyond our differences.”

  • Greenleaf [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    521 year ago

    Gaza aid leader faces backlash over Labour Party run

    Melanie Ward, CEO of the Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) charity, faces major backlash from volunteers and workers after deciding to run as a Labour Party candidate in Scotland. Some 2,250 healthcare workers, medical volunteers, supporters, and donors signed a letter expressing concern.

    On June 5, a protest letter was filed by workers and volunteers at MAP, expressing their dismay to the board over Ward’s candidacy with the UK Labour Party. To run for the position of MP in Scotland’s Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath constituency, Ward has taken a leave of absence but has not stepped down from her position.

    Despite Ward’s pledge to make real progress for the Palestinian people if elected to Parliament, MAP is currently without an acting CEO during a healthcare collapse in Gaza. Some fear her actions could jeopardize the aid organization’s efforts on the ground, leading to threats of referring MAP to the Charity Commission.

    Ward has a history of affiliations with pro-Israel lobby groups, starting with her first trip to Palestine, organized by the Israeli Embassy-funded Union of Jewish Students (UJS). She blogged about meeting Israeli politicians and visiting settlements but shifted her perspective after a second visit to the West Bank. However, her relationship with UJS continued, including participating in a 2017 UJS panel called “Bridges Not Boycotts,” opposing boycotts of Israel.

    Ward also supported the anti-Semitism “witch hunt” during Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, which purged much of Labour’s pro-Palestinian base, including many Jewish anti-Zionists. She tweeted, “Farewell to Jeremy Corbyn, who really was a truly terrible Labour Party Leader. He will be missed not one little bit by those of us who want to see Labour in government again.”

    In 2016, she signed a letter calling for Corbyn’s resignation, shared an article urging the public not to vote for him and tweeted the former Labour leader in 2015, “Corbyn unable to think of situation where he’d commit Forces to military action. Should think a bit harder if he wants to be PM,” in response to his anti-war stance.

    I always thought MAP was a pretty good org (and it’s possible/probable they are, just bad leadership) but no reason to give them money so long as Ward is in charge and good orgs like PCRF exist.