I need some help finding a distro for a very old machine.

It’s my family’s old desktop with 2001 components (bought in 2004) and a Pentium CPU that is NOT i686. I checked the exact model and architecture once but I don’t remember it now. The only thing I remember is that it’s not i686 so 99% of modern 32 bit distros don’t work on it (stuck right after grub).

The machine has 1 Gb of DDR1 RAM though so I think it may be useful or at least fun to play around with.

Now it’s on Windows XP that runs quite well but doesn’t support modern SSL certificates so it can’t browse the internet (idk how to fix it ok?).

A long time ago I tried to run multiple distros in live mode on it and got only one (Puppy) to work. Display, sound, ethernet and pretty much everything worked fine. GPU seemed to be an issue though because NVidia and I couldn’t install the driver (it was skill issue and I think it’s possible to do). But now it doesn’t work for some reason.

Are there any Linux distros or other operating systems (preferably not deprecated) that I can install on it? And btw it does have bootable USB support.

EDIT: There are way too many answers and a lot of ones that don’t mind the architecture limitations. I’m grateful to everyone who replied but I have to close this discussion now and I will not reply to further answers. I have received enough information and I cannot physically read so many replies.

  • CocoLopez
    link
    fedilink
    211 months ago

    Void with Xfce has done wonders to my atom cpu with 2 GB of ram. Also iceWM has seen a new release that might worth checking

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    811 months ago

    A long time ago I tried to run multiple distros in live mode on it and got only one (Puppy) to work. Display, sound, ethernet and pretty much everything worked fine. GPU seemed to be an issue though because NVidia and I couldn’t install the driver (it was skill issue and I think it’s possible to do). But now it doesn’t work for some reason.

    Puppy linux has 3 versions, based on different distros. Maybe you tried one version back then, and now a different one?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        511 months ago

        Puppy was going to me my suggestion too, before I read that you’d already used it. Maybe try some of the other versions? If you used a Debian- or Ubuntu-based Puppy, you could try a Slack-based one, or vice-versa. Puppy’s organization is a little confusing, in my opinion, but it does give a user some options. You also might try some of the “puplets” that aren’t official Puppy distros but are part of the Puppy family.

        https://puppylinux-woof-ce.github.io/family-tree.html

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 months ago

    Boot to BIOS. That should show you either CPU arch. or an exact model that you can check on Intel’s website. It may be an issue entirely unrelated to the architecture.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Now it’s on Windows XP that runs quite well but doesn’t support modern SSL certificates so it can’t browse the internet (idk how to fix it ok?).

    Yes there are modernized versions of Windows XP with updated certificates and whatnot.

    The only thing I remember is that it’s not i686 so 99% of modern 32 bit distros don’t work on it (stuck right after grub).

    Debian has images for i386: https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/i386/

    But… frankly the power consumption of that thing will be just crazy. Take for example this example, a more modern Pentium D vs a Pi:

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/compare/6390478?baseline=5583060

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    911 months ago

    Are you sure it’s not a 686? Because apparently the Pentium Pro from 1995 is already a 686, by 2001 the Pentium 4 was already out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        We really need to see info from the BIOS — exact CPU model, RAM speed, etc.

        As others have pointed out, this is a pretty anachronistic build — i586 with DDR1 is just weird, so it’s possible there’s some really niche hardware and you may need an exotic kernel (or kernel options) to get anything to boot.

        That said: have you just tried running a standard live or install CD from that time period? You could try booting a 2001 Slackware installer to see what happens.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        I’m still skeptical. At the time of the original Pentium (the last 586 from Intel, the fastest of which was 300 MHz), the usual amount of RAM was something like 16 or 32 MB. A 586 with 1 GB of RAM is extremely weird and probably impossible unless it’s some sort of high-end server. This does not check out.

        Oh and DDR is also from around the time of the Pentium 4. I don’t think there exists a machine that has both DDR and an original Pentium (aka 586). Again, this does not check out and is probably impossible.

        There could be another reason it won’t boot.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Yeah, I’m with you. 2001 and DDR… there’s something else going on with the failure to boot. I don’t think the Pentium 3 ever supported DDR, so this is probably a Pentium 4. If truly a model released in 2001, it would be Willamette, but that required RDRAM. DDR support was introduced with Northwood in 2002. On the other hand, it could be the P4 that was new in 2004, Prescott, and the 2001 statement comes from the first year the P4 was released.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Ya, that’s exactly my thought. I had Penitum 1 and Pentium 3/4 during those years. Pretty sure they are 686 and beyond.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Could even be Cryix or a VIA or something from back then. VIA lacked cmov and will not boot i686.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    Technically, Ubuntu supports it’s LTS versions for something like 12 years I think?

    Anyway, you can get Ubuntu 14.04 LTS still with the i386 32bit ISO.

    https://www.releases.ubuntu.com/14.04/

    I personally would install that and install something like FVWM95 or Blackbox WM or some other ancien desktop environment.

  • TeddyKila [comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    511 months ago

    Is a cheap ARM SBC an option? You’d save like $80 per year just on power consumption, and could run a modern kernel.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 months ago

    I’ll throw Alpine Linux into the mix. Not sure how well it supports older hardware, but it’s really small.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1511 months ago

    There’s gentoo options for a lot of older architectures. I even got it running on a 32bit power machine.

    Back in the day gentoo meant compiling everything from source, but nowadays there’s precompiled binaries.

    If you’re doing the evanescence routine on older hardware, check to see if there’s cheap ram and ssds available that work with its interfaces. Usually the trick with pata is to use old cf to sata adapters because cf is pin compatible with the little pata interfaces they’d put on laptops.

    Consider cleaning and reapplying thermal paste to the cpu. You won’t even need to take it out of the socket, just don’t dump isopropyl all over the board while cleaning.

    If your old computer has a cool old sound card there’s never been a better time to use a tracker that takes advantage of its built in synthesizer!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      I agree that Gentoo will probably work, as it still has functional i486 support. Be aware that you may be spending a lot of time compiling if you go that route and don’t have a second, faster machine to use for distcc or the like.

      As for the nvidia card, the proprietary driver won’t work for something of that age. Check the supported cards in Nouveau (and maybe even the really old drivers for prehistoric cards). In a pinch, the vesa driver should work. Good luck.

    • d-RLY?
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      doing the evanescence routine on older hardware

      That was one of the best deep-cut comments I have read in a while! The helpful advise to OP was also nice. lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1911 months ago

    Just reading through the comments, and your post. You’d honestly have a much better time getting a Pi of some sort and just running that. This is antiquated hardware that is going to have all sorts of headaches even if you do get it running.