I really enjoy archlinux so I was thinking on downloading garuda gaming but I’m unsure if that’s the way to go. What distro do you guys use? Have you encontered many problems with it?
Any of them. I’ve gamed on Debian, Pop, Arch, Nix, Fedora, etc. Pick a DE you like, a package manager you like, a release cycle you like, an init system you like, etc and find the distro that matches. If you like Arch then use Arch. It’s perfectly suitable for gaming.
I use Mint for my main gaming PC. Most things worked out of the box.
On my previous laptop everything worked out of the box, I jus had to install the nvidia driver. On my newest one the GPU required a newer driver than what was available for my kernel, so I had to experiment with various combinations of kernel and driver combinations before I found something that worked well.
I settled for kernel 6.0.0-1018 + nvidia 535.40.03 for my rtx4060.
deleted by creator
Why flatpak Steam?
Flatpak includes all the libraries Steam, proton, and games need to run, sandboxed and without having to mess with the ones installed more generally on your system. Can help prevent headaches and compatibility issues.
deleted by creator
doesnt matter at all
I’ve had really good luck with Pop!_OS. AMD CPU and NVIDIA GPU, so having the NVIDIA drivers bundled is nice.
Most games in my Steam library work out of the box with no tinkering of Proton. I’ve lucked out in that the games that do require tinkering work with Proton Experimental or Glorious Eggroll’s releases. Lutris is the same, though I just default to the latest Glorious Eggroll release.
I prefer Linux Mint, but I don’t believe there is a “best” for gaming; simply select the one with which you are most familiar.
It doesn’t really matter as long as you’re on something with recentish packages.
I’ve been on Arch for the past year or so and it’s been working pretty well.
I’ve used openSUSE, Void, Fedora, Debian, and Ubuntu in the past for gaming and they’ve all been decent.
I’m just on Arch because I wanted a newer kernel and graphics drivers than Debian.
I found Garuda to be bloated when I tried it out, but I didn’t try it on a beefy gaming rig, so maybe my system was just underpowered? I use Pop!_OS on my gaming rig and have had very few problems with it (most problems I’ve had are because I use a(n?) Nvidia GPU) and those problems have been easily solved.
Nobara is a great gaming focused distro, it’s a fork of Fedora by a well-known Red Hat employee.
@shreddy_scientist @alehc Well, not just for gaming, but for beginners, or people who like the simplicity of the desktop environment, Linux Mint. I used it for quite a long time, and altough is has some quirks (as any linux distros do), it is a decent all-rounder, for everyday use and for gaming too.
That’s what makes Nobara so rad, it works great for gaming because it has a number of the most downloaded packages built in!
It’s by the GloriousEggroll guys, and I really liked it a lot. I would still be using it if it worked better with my laptop’s hybrid Nvidia graphics setup. When I get around to swapping my desktop to linux, I’ll almost certainly go with Nobara first.
FWIW, Pop!_OS is where I landed for great hybrid graphics support.
You enjoy Arch but you’re thinking of getting another distro based on Arch for gaming?
I enjoy Arch on my laptop but I am getting a new gaming PC pretty soon and I am wondering what distro to install there. Hope that makes sense.
When I bought a PC I just
dd-ed the Arch from my notebook. Works just fine.@alehc
of course #Arch! What else? 🤔
@avidamoeba
Plain arch is great for gaming, no need for a gaming specific distro
+1 most differences between the common distros are package manager, de, and some defaults only so in theory they are all the same (yes I know some use musl or no systemd but that’s besides the point).
I use Mint for gaming with a 6.1 oem kernel and kisak-mesa drivers. Works great, super stable with no issues. Most stuff has an Ubuntu LTS release, for everything else I use Flatpak.
I’ve used arch for 7-8 years. I’m currently using Garuda for gaming, on year 2 or 3.
My recommendation is that if arch is working for you just fine, then don’t bother switching. I only switched because I had a breakage and it seemed time to switch (only 2 significant breakages in those 7or 8 years)
If you hadn’t started with arch I would in fact recommend Garuda first because the initial setup is much more hands free, start it and install stuff and it just works. Also Garuda comes preconfigured with an AUR setup and installers for that and for the glorious egg roll proton.
That is all crap you can simply set up yourself on arch, so there’s no need for you to switch, if you’re fine with the arch and slightly more manual configuration then you’re all set with arch and have no real reason to change that.
Seconding this. Garuda has been great, all of the advantages of aur and bleeding edge with some fool proofing and ease of use features. It’s like pop_os for folks who don’t want to jump on the Ubuntu train.
Regular Fedora Workstation is a good compromise between stability and new kernels etc.
Personally I like the KDE spin best: https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/
deleted by creator
+1 from me. Fedora is a nice middle ground - stable, polished, yet adopting new things fast.
I built my Linux gaming PC with 23.04 Ubuntu. It has kernel 6.2. Easy to install. Uses my Xbox and PS5 controller. Runs great with my Nvidia graphics card.
But you may want to try a few different distro and see which one you like.
