• Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    This is why most skepticism based programs don’t work, and Mythbusters did.

    They didn’t try to be smug about it, they didn’t belittle people who believed in the myths, they never brought religion and politics into it, and the biggest pitfall they avoided: They never pretended that the “science was settled” and that they “already knew everything”, they simply did the research and went where the data took them.

    Too many skepticism based programs seem to think the scientific method is running into a church, yelling “FAKE!”, and then running outside to hurl insults at passersby.

    Mythbusters didn’t do that, they skipped the dogma and went straight to the science.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Also, most of the myths weren’t “serious”- it wasn’t like they were debunking flat earth or something.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        it wasn’t like they were debunking flat earth or something

        Though you could do that. And with equipment and a type of experiment that would make sense on their show. The experiment conducted at the very end of the documentary Behind the Curve is perfect. Great big lasers, a simple and easy-to-visualise pass condition. If they had wanted to, they absolutely could have done it.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I mean, yes.

          but their myths generally didn’t piss surprisingly large segments of the population off. it was more… the urban legends that gave them an excuse to blow stuff up, shoot stuff, or otherwise crash stuff; all in slow motion.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Could’ve had an episode where they tried as many experiments as they could fit into a two-week production.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        I hate that debunking flat earth is now seen as serious rather than a 5th grade science experiment.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I actually got fired because I told a Flat Earther to leave the store I worked in, it was closing time and he was harassing people… But if you bitch enough to corporate you can get us to walk on water…

          Whatever, I’m a Janitor now, never doing retail again.

          It’s too easy to debunk flat earth, if it were flat cats would have knocked everything off by now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    I wish more people in general would be OK with being wrong. Noone ever learned something new without knowing they’d been wrong

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      You should checknout SMyths, fan edits that remove the cutting back and forth between stories so you get one myth at a time, and that cut out the repetitive narration meant for people joining mid-episode. Much nicer viewing

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1091 year ago

      It’s amazing to me that Discovery hasn’t tried to bring Mythbusters back. Instead they double down on Ancient Aliens and Pawnstars garbage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 year ago

        If you need you fix Adam savage is very active on YouTube and is just a wonder human being. It’s not MythBusters but Adam was a light during Covid and someone I put on regularly on YouTube.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          Yeah, I watch him. It’s not Mythbusters, but it’s still entertaining usually, even when he’s doing the most boring things. It really shows how good he was as an entertainer.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            My favorite thing about Adam’s videos is the way they are edited, they leave in some silence so you can see Adam’s head gears working as he’s solving a problem. It sorta feels like we’re solving the problem with him.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        561 year ago

        They did try to bring it back, but it was really a show that needed its core cast to be what it was.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        841 year ago

        I’m pretty sure they did try to bring it back but it wasn’t as popular because it wasn’t Adam and Jamie

        • Captain Aggravated
          link
          fedilink
          English
          301 year ago

          I remember during the run of Mythbusters either Discovery or History or one of those tried to launch another show to cash in on Mythbusters’ success, it was called Smash Lab, and it’s clear the creation of this show involved a pie chart titled “Elements of Mythbusters by screen time” and there was one pie wedge labelled “explosions.” It didn’t last long IIRC.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          From listening to podcasts done by people involved in those attempts to bring the show back, it seems the show runners/studios in charge didn’t understand what made the show good and tried to steer their recreations in bad directions. It does seem like most every host they brought on had good intentions and skillsets, but were held back in some way.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          391 year ago

          Adam and Jamie were awesome, but I’m certain there are some passionate makers or something out there who could fill the role. It wouldn’t be the same, but it could be it’s own thing. Whoever the new hosts were must have just been the wrong casting, but also I don’t know how much Discovery cared because I didn’t know about it and I was a huge Mythbusters fan. I guess I just didn’t pay attention because Discovery had already killed everything that was worth paying attention to them for by that point.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            341 year ago

            It’s been a while since I watched them but I recall feeling like the new hosts weren’t genuine. It felt more like a YouTube reaction video than an episode of Mythbusters.

            • Pennomi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              391 year ago

              Mythbusters fundamentally needs to capture the joy of engineering more than the joy of explosions. (Not that those aren’t fun too.)

        • idunnololz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          IIRC I read that the hosts hated one another and refuse to work with each other ever again.

          • PorkSoda
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            If you’re talking about Adam and Jamie, this is not true and has been repeatedly debunked by both of them.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Real Science attracts smart people who want to learn a thing or two about the world, Fake Science attracts the kind of gullible kooks you can sell snake oil and orgonite devices to… and I say this as someone who “wants to believe”

        Same reason why scam e-mails and telemarketers intentionally leave big gaping holes in their stories while using dozens of spelling errors. If you’re the kind of person who can notice things like that, you’re too smart to buy what they’re selling.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Yeah its a real monkeys paw situation too. Will they be able to catch that same lightning in a jar again without the same cast?

        • Tlaloc_Temporal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 year ago

          If they understood what made it great, maybe. They don’t though, and definitely won’t care to try.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    Sometimes there’s a twitch stream of random mythbusters episodes. It’s so fun.

    I wish they came back :/

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      We need less entertainment that runs forever and more that has a plan for how long it should be.

      In this case it ran as long as it was feasible, then a little longer and then they where done.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        I think Mythbusters is a little bit of a different case than something more narrative. There are always new myths to bust; every generation needs something that makes science cool. I guess now that’s a role mainly filled by various YouTubers.

  • The Picard Maneuver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    751 year ago

    Being able to separate your ego and desire to be right from the learning process is such an important skill.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 year ago

      I remember being stubborn, being proved wrong, continuing to be stubborn, and being proved wrong even harder, in front of others.

      It’s such a pathetic and embarrassing feeling to be that wrong.

      I don’t want to be wrong a moment longer than I need to be.

      There’s no shame in being corrected, but there is in holding on to shit ideas.

      • dohpaz42
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        This is the right attitude more people should have. But all too often, when people are proven wrong, they genuinely believe that it must be the other person/group, because they cannot accept the emotional consequences of being wrong.

        I know that I’ve had a hard time learning this because growing up I was never held to account for my actions on an emotional level. It was the 80s and 90s, and adults at that time would either shrug it off, or go straight to the nuclear punishment of corporal punishment. Never once would they sit down and talk to you about why what you did was wrong and how to do it better next time. I, anecdotally, believe that a lot of genx suffer this same way. They simply haven’t learned that there is a better way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s amazing how social norms have changed.

          I’ve got a two year old, who drives me absolutely insane sometimes. I think if I grew up in my parents culture, where it was acceptable to smack kids or shout at them, I probably would.

          That’s a horrible thing to say, but I’m glad I’m aware of the fact that it’s counter-productive. I’m almost jealous of my child, to know they’ve got someone like me as a father, as opposed to my father.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Well, talking to kids and explaining things to them takes time, and it’s basically work. How inconvenient.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Also, you have to know what a better way to handle a situation is. If someone’s the type of person who hits a kid for misbehavior, maybe they don’t know how to do better.

            My husband and I are in our mid thirties, and are actively holding off on kids until we feel like we’ve gotten better at managing our emotions. Our parents had kids much earlier, and ended up exercising their emotional dysfunction on small children

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              I could be completely wrong, but my life experience so far suggests that the best way to get better at something is to put yourself into situations where you have to actually practice the skill. I’ve been fostering cats and kittens for a few years, and I think it has really pushed me to learn how to manage my emotions better.

    • peto (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Or at least use classical conditioning to associate the I’m wrong feeling with the impending new cool facts feeling.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Plus being able to figure out a semilegitimate excuse to blow stuff up. “This could be very dangerous so we’re going to do several things to make it safer. That’s teaching safe lab techniques, so it’s educational!”

  • Atelopus-zeteki
    link
    fedilink
    251 year ago

    I would say escaping from quick sand and escaping from an alligator chasing me were two major concerns in my childhood. LoL, global climate change was maybe not even on the list, for which I will curse the petroleum industry.

  • booty [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    I just looked up the elephant vs mouse segment. The way the elephants reacted, I kinda feel like they’re being cautious because they recognize a harmless lil animal and don’t want to step on it. Like they behave pretty much exactly how I do when I see a little spider or frog or cricket or something. like “whoa there buddy, you dont wanna be under my feet”

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    871 year ago

    Quoth Adam Savage: “It’s not ‘my experiment failed’, it’s ‘my experiment yielded data!’”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    This is what conspiracy theorists don’t get. The world’s scientists are not skeptical of your claims that water has secret spiritual memory because they hate you, they are skeptical because the claim you make, if it were true, would be so important and world-changing that they want to be absolutely sure of it before they endorse it.

    The difference is that, to a scientist, “this would be amazing if it were true” is not a good reason to believe it anyway

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Yep, Electronic Frontier Foundation. Key players in Right To Repair in the US. With good history of “fighting for the user”.