• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    810 months ago

    Like the far right in my country before the elections “We have the solution to fix the economy, vote for us” - without of course saying what they’re going to do.

    Unfortunately, majority of people believed them

    Populism works, people like to vote for someone that says what they want to listen even if it’s obvious that they’re not going to do that

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      Generally their playbook is open, it just doesn’t work. Their strategy is to let rich people do whatever they want and hoard as much wealth as they can, and that prosperity obviously will trickle down to everyone.

      However when taxes are relatively higher on the rich and regulations do things like punish them for poisoning a water source, they spend their resources gaslighting the populace into thinking economy is just terrible and if your personal experience does not bear that out, well your just lucky and you’ll be out on the streets in a few months unless you vote right.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1010 months ago

    Everyone is saying his plan is to give Ukraine to Russia, but his actual plan is to try to give all of Europe to Russia by pulling out of NATO.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        I’ve been digging into the whole rape thing, correct me if I’m wrong but it looks a lot like a smear campaign than anything else, that is which to say, there is zero evidence he did this and yet the mainstream media has been instructed to go hard with it lately to perhaps persuade the public to vote against him… thoughts?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          It’s virtually impossible to smear Trump, because what could you come to with that’s worse than the truth?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          “As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr. Trump, in fact, did ‘rape’ Ms. Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.” - Lewis A. Kaplan: Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              510 months ago

              Pretty much, except it may be more appropriate to replace “implies” with “determined there was sufficient evidence to conclude”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                310 months ago

                Listen, I’m not a lawyer, I’m not trying to say I am.

                It’s widely understood that civil litigation is held to a lower level of scrutiny than criminal proceedings are.

                It’s widely accepted that jury trials are more prone to error than other types of hearings.

                The legal meaning of the word “implicit” in that sentence is something close to “we didn’t ask the jury about this, but something they did rule on could be interpreted as implying it”.

                I’m not making an excuse for trump or normalizing rape when I say the following:

                That is paper fucking thin.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 months ago

          You have been corrected because you are very obviously wrong. Are you going to integrate this correction into your espoused views going forward or are you just going to repeat the same brain dead bullshit again and again?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Angry vitriol to a stranger on the internet for holding a opposing view, Let it all out there buddy!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          By “digging into” do you mean “reading about it on truth social”? Because that is the only way in which someone might look into this situation and conclude trump isn’t guilty

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            I use twitter because it has the community notes thing and tends to allow both sides of the spectrum to state their views

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1010 months ago

          He’s been on Epsteins plane 7 times. He was his friend.

          Trump also knew Epstein liked “younger girls”.

          It’s all in court documents

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2310 months ago

      Everyone knows this, but it’s difficult to point out how dogshit Trump’s “plan” is if he refuses to state what his actual plan is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      And when Putin asks Trump to accept the end of Ukraine and no longer accept the Ukrainian language as separate from Russian, he will immediately do some executive orders.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3310 months ago

      I, too, love when I get to prevent an entire country from invasion by an evil force, but only when I get to take credit for it. Someone else stealing my idea for peace is just as bad as someone else stealing a joke I said first, if not worse.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        You’re talking to someone who agreed with SCOTUS’ decision allowing Trump to commit crimes, just so you know where they’re coming from.

    • TooManyFoods
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      We had this conversation in 2016 about beating isis in 30 days. Turned out he lied about the plan. Besides if biden had to follow trumps plan that would mean that it was trumps plan right? It would be a better argument for trump to get into office. It would mean that biden has to do what trump says to get things done.

      The truth is, Trump is lying about having a plan like in 2016. I didn’t fall for it then. I won’t fall for it now. If you’re falling for it again, it’s pathetic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        It’s really telling that they care more about clout than actually doing the things that might make the world a little less shitty. Shameless fraudsters can’t be bothered to do anything useful unless there’s a material reward in it for them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Trump did what he said he was going to do, Biden can’t even remember what he said he was going to do. Anyone who thinks Biden should be running things in the US is just living in denial at this point

        • TooManyFoods
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          Weird. He said isis wouldn’t exist 30 days into his presidency almost 8 years ago. Isis still exist. Anyone who says Trump did what he said he was going to do is delusional.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6510 months ago

      His plan will be to “give Putin everything he wants”

      And then he’ll be like “aren’t I the greatest negotiator?!?”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Which time?

        Edit: oh dammit. I now see someone else already made this joke. Ok, to make it up to you, I’ll tell a different joke.

        So a woman in her Chicago high rise apartment was beating a rug with a broom on her balcony. Suddenly a big burst of wind blew her over the railing.

        Now she’s falling from the 30th floor.

        A man on the 25th floor sees this, catches her, and says “Wow, it must be my lucky day! A beautiful woman falls out of the sky and into my arms! Tell me young miss, do you suck dick?”

        Outraged by this she screams “NO I DON’T SUCK DICK!!!”

        So he drops her.

        A man on the 20th floor sees her falling, and catches her. He says: Wow, it must be my lucky day! A beautiful woman falls out of the sky and into my arms! Tell me young miss, would you be willing to fuck me?"

        Insulted by the idea she screams “NO I DON’T FUCK STRANGERS!!!”

        So he drops her.

        As she’s falling, she realizes she’s going to die, and in her final moments she prays. “Please god, just let ONE more person catch me! I promise to do any revolting thing they ask!”

        And on the 15th floor, a woman catches her. Before her rescuer can say a word, the woman screams “I SUCK! I FUCK! I’LL DO ANYTHING YOU WANT!!!”

        Revolted by this, the woman holding her says “Slut!”

        And drops her.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7410 months ago

    Same plan he made in Syria and Afghanistan. Abandon US allies in the region, hand over all local assets to hostile forces and leak intel like damn spaghetti strainer.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if he ordered the DoD to hanf over all the intel we have about Ukraine to Russia and withdraw all other support and recon in the area.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Trump didn’t withdraw from Afghanistan. Biden followed the timeline trump set (with a slight delay, maybe?) and got no end of shit for it.

        Trump negotiated with the Taliban without inviting the Afghan government, and released a bunch of them from prison.

        For fuck’s sake, if you want to shit on liberals at least try and get your talking points right.

        Blue MAGA

        Further proof that you’re an unserious clown.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          My talking points are from reality not from liberal propaganda. Trump retreated the majority of the troops already. Biden finished the retreat. It most definitely started with Trump.

          As part of the United States–Taliban deal, the Trump administration agreed to an initial reduction of US forces from 13,000 to 8,600 troops by July 2020, followed by a complete withdrawal by 1 May 2021, if the Taliban kept its commitments. At the start of the Biden administration, there were 2,500 US soldiers remaining in Afghanistan

          I’m not sure what “Afghan government” you are talking about. The puppets we put in power which were rampantly raping children because we backed them up? As soon as the money was gone the “Afghan government” dissolved within a day. Literally. Those people were not ideologically driven they were just a bunch of corrupt druggies that got a free pass to rape children as long as they obeyed us.

          If you want to dunk on Trump bring up January 6, his Muslim ban or any other of the million stupid things he did, not him retreating from Afghanistan. Talk about talking points…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1810 months ago

      The USA, Iran and Russia are responsible for syrian civil war. None should have got involved in it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4810 months ago

        Be as that may be, Trump absolutely selling out the Kurdish Militia that was a long time US ally in the region was not acceptable.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          810 months ago

          Trump absolutely selling out the Kurdish Militia

          Shhh, the MSM isn’t saying anything negative about the orange felon.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Imperial powers created Syria. Modern Syria anyway. The entire Middle East has been an Imperial project since colonialism. Pretty much only the Saudis and Israel (and Iran, if you want to count it as Middle Eastern) aren’t on board.

            • Pelicanen
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 months ago

              I mean, not for lack of trying, they did stage a coup and plant the Shah of Iran as the leader for a while

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            810 months ago

            Of course it had nothing to do with the repressive authoritarian regime killing its own people because they had the temerity to protest.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              710 months ago

              Of course the usa support rebels because they care about syrians and human life and not because they only cares about their own interest. The usa representing democracy is the number one supported of coups over the world, the country who represent human rights ignores the crimes commited by israel and is allying with saudi arabia. The countries who had revolutions without imperialist powers didn’t fell into a civil war inlike all other revolutions with russia or usa interference.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        The start of the Syrian civil war had nothing to do with anyone except the Syrian people being pissed off at living under the most restrictive police state in the Arab world. There were protests after a mass arrest and subsequent torture of 15 teenage boys who had spay-painted some anti-government graffiti on some walls around the city.

        Assad cracked down on the protests hard, which led to people saying, “fuck this shit, time for a revolution”.

        Iran started helping Assad, and then the US started helping the rebels. And yeah it’s a shit show now. But no, it would have kicked off without outside help.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          A lot of people would still have died without outside intervention and syrian had the right to kick of the revolution against asad. I don’t disagree with that but outaide intervation definitely made it a lot worse. Ben ali wasalso very brutal but due to the lack of interests from major powers the revolution in tunisia was relatively very peaceful

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Again, the context is important. Mostly that the Tunisian military refused to step in and support Wasalo, eventually forcing him to flee.

            Asad on the other hand, is still very popular with his own ethnic group, and draws heavily from them to staff his military. Iran’s help just made things worse.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Liberals will criticize ending a pointless 20 year war and somehow still not realize that they’re jingos.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        The criticisms are universally about how he “ended” it. I have seen no one that was in favor of staying. Likewise, Trump gets criticism on betraying our allies because he knowingly and intentionally ratfucked the kurds, or have you totally forgotten about that?

        • OBJECTION!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          And that criticism was always bullshit. There’s no “right” way to retreat, it was always going to play out the way it did. Journalists criticized it in bad faith, because it generated clicks and because they never actually opposed the war, because again, war is great for clicks. In reality, what happened when the US pulled out was the culmination of 20 years spent doing nothing to stabilize the country and only making the Taliban stronger.

          But go ahead then, armchair strategist, and describe to me what specifically could’ve been done differently about the withdrawal that would not have resulted in things playing out the way they did.

          Opposing the withdrawal is the same as supporting the war. The withdrawal was one of the only good things Biden did in his whole career and liberals will never forgive him for it. Worse yet, you want to allow Trump to claim credit for it when Biden’s the one who actually saw it through and had to deal with the flak from it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          Trump didn’t end the war in Afghanistan. Biden did. The President who determined how that happened was Joe Biden.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            “The Trump administration in February 2020 negotiated a withdrawal agreement with the Taliban that excluded the Afghan government, freed 5,000 imprisoned Taliban soldiers and set a date certain of May 1, 2021, for the final withdrawal.”

            “And the Trump administration kept to the pact, reducing U.S. troop levels from about 13,000 to 2,500, even though the Taliban continued to attack Afghan government forces and welcomed al-Qaeda terrorists into the Taliban leadership.”

            • OBJECTION!
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              “And the Trump administration kept to the pact, reducing U.S. troop levels from about 13,000 to 2,500, even though the Taliban continued to attack Afghan government forces and welcomed al-Qaeda terrorists into the Taliban leadership.”

              So should the withdrawal have been stopped at that point? Exactly how much longer do you think we should’ve stayed in Afghanistan?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    210 months ago

    The entire military complex is milking the US taxpayer dollar from this war, if Trump were to stand in the way of the MIC and their income… given the presidential assassinations observed in recent history I would imagine that he would have multiple crosshairs on his forehead:.: it would take an incredible amount of patriotic duty to ignore that risk and pull funding anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2110 months ago

      “It would be so patriotic to let the Ukrainians get genocided by our long-time enemy bro”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        Putin has been on Tucker Carlson and remained fairly clear since the beginning that this war is not about killing Ukraine people (in a genocide as you word it)… in fact the genocide is really happening as a result of US influence, Russia has many legitimate reasons to seek unification of Ukraine with Russian interests, I don’t agree with them, but I disagree that it is a US interest to send US taxpayer money to Ukraine for weapons and arms to prolong this war.

        America simply cannot afford to forever siphon money out of the coffers to Ukraine which then purchase weapons and arms which then make the weapons and arms dealers more powerful and wealthy… it’s a wholesale scam, just as we saw in the Middle East… Orwell predicted this, long drawn out pointless wars that suddenly stop when a new war is created. Today we’re told Russia bad guy, tomorrow it might be palestines Hamas, in the future we may see a forever war with China…

        It doesn’t really matter at this point. America just like other allied nations should stay out of other people’s wars. Military tax money should be on a need to have basis only

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1510 months ago

          During the course of the entire war, the US has spent $175 billion helping Ukraine. This might sound like a lot until you realize that in just a single year, the US’ federal budget is $6.5 trillion. So even if we paid for everything all at once, there’s still $6.32 trillion left this year.

          Not to mention most of the money goes back into the American economy. We are spending money on weapons that are largely sitting in warehouses that we would otherwise need to be replaced. Weapons don’t last forever. So for pennies on the dollar we are saving Ukrainian cities from being “liberated” by our cold war enemy that never stopped being our cold war enemy. Sounds like a great investment to me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Yea the idea of “oh we get the money back” or “we have weapons lying around” isn’t selling it to me.

            Also, Russia has nukes… we shouldn’t be tempting WW3. The whole thing is eff’d