When you connect a new device to a ‘smart’ tv, you must pay homage to the manufacturer with a ritualistic dance. Plugging and unplugging the device. Turning them on and off in the correct sequence like entering a konami code.

Every time you want to switch devices, the tv must scan for them. And god forbid you lose power, or unplug something. You are granted the delight experience of doing it all over again.

I have fond memories of the days of just plugging something in, and pressing the input button. Instant gratification. It was a simpler time.

What is some other tech that used to be better?

  • Stepos Venzny
    link
    fedilink
    English
    611 months ago

    I have a smart TV and, while I hate that fact with every fiber of my being, I’ve never been through any of the particular bullshit you’re describing. I absolutely can just plug a thing into it and it works when I switch to that input.

    I’m going to go with video game console disk trays. Back on the PS1 and GameCube, you just hit a button to release a lock and then a spring popped the lid open. Now, I’ll admit these newfangled interior conveyor belts we’ve had for checks calendar almost two decades have never actually broken on me, I resent the fact that if they were to break then I’d have no actual ability to get disks in and out of the machine.

    That is, of course, assuming your console has an option for physical media at all, which is a very troubling direction in itself.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 months ago

    Analog cable with a cable-ready TV was better than digital cable. No set-top box with bullshit rental fees, no weird lag waiting for it to “boot up” or change channels, no interactivity so they couldn’t easily try to upsell you, etc.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1511 months ago

    The physical aspect of laptops - the old ThinkPads were fucking amazing and while their specs may not be much to look at today they were equipped with adequate cooling and could take a fair amount of beating.

    I don’t want a light thin laptop that I could snap in two with one hand… I want a laptop that isn’t going to overheat and can survive a few tumbles when someone trips over the power cord.

    • Drusas
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      This is a funny one for me because I actually burned my lap on a ThinkPad back in something like 2003.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      That’s an interesting example. Around 2010, I had a MacBook Pro (granted, before they were super thin) and I’d regularly pick it up by the screen. I then had a thinkpad for work and did the same thing and it cracked in half.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    911 months ago

    Smart TVs and cae infotainnent systems, for sinilar reasons. Full of bloat, so many bugs and unreliable functioning.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      My old Panasonic TV had a fugly but extremely speedy OTA guide. It would load, display and start accepting (rapid) input in 0.2s when you clicked “Guide”.

      My new LG - I mean, for Darwin’s sake, it’s like no one gave two shits about OTA programming. The guide takes 1.5s to load, then each channel row loads in, sloooowly, and scrolling is like shuffling clay tablets.

      I’d take my old TV back if I could.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7011 months ago

    Instant messaging.

    20 years ago, there were half a dozen competing major platforms (AIM, Yahoo, ICQ, MSN, etc), like today.

    The difference is that you had your choice of half a dozen clients that could each talk to ALL of the platforms. Adium, Trillian, Kopete, etc.

    Today’s kids have no idea what we lost to the god of profit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      Text Messages killed instant message programs. Same “format”, but infinitely portable and won’t crash out your full screen game when you get a new message.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1011 months ago

      I feel like AIM was the de facto god-emperor of IM platforms and the rest were just also-rans.

      Maybe that was just my experience tho, but I feel like ICQ and IRC were older but more clunky, MSN and Yahoo were newer or contemporary but less dependable and had less buy in from the community.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1011 months ago

        Maybe it’s just my personal era, but MSN/Messenger was used solely in the group I grew up around. With maybe an addition of trillium eventually

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          In my bubble, MSN was the first messenger used by non-nerds. For me it was the third messenger after IRC and ICQ that i really used. Nerds were on IRC, Gamers on ICQ

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            really? opposite for me and my group back in the late 90s/early 00s. IRC was for gamers as it was easier to organize a group since most games at the time someone had to host and connect to their IP. ICQ was more for friends and nerd stuff.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            MSN was for your friends and friends of friends, ICQ was gamers and pre-MSN friends, IRC was for pretending you were a 17 year old girl from California.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        511 months ago

        ICQ and IRC were older and more popular just before AIM. I first got online in 96 or 97 and then it was all mIRC and ICQ (Hell I still remember my ICQ number off the top of my head, 18982172) then I’d say around 99/00 it transitioned primarily to AIM with a bit of ICQ and other random chatrooms that were “cooler” than IRC like “The Palace” which was essentially irc but with avatars.

        But then with Trillium or like Pigeon it all transitioned to that and in a weird way message boards circled back around and replaced chat rooms. Things just gradually got more and more isolated. Then Myspace and eventually Facebook replaced all of that and eventually discord just replaced everything.

        I don’t use Discord, I can’t stand it. I miss the days of IRC and ICQ.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2411 months ago

    I think radios the fact the digital ones use much more battery and just break all the time. I think FM was higher quality as well at least in the UK.

    • EleventhHour
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      well, radio was better back in the day. now it’s bland pop crap for the 5 minutes per hour that isn’t shitty ads

    • Palacegalleryratio [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      I had a crank powered am/fm radio, no bigger or heavier than a pack of cards, that used a pair of wired headphones as the antenna. About a minute of cranking got you about 20 mins of surprisingly decent quality radio. I used to use it all the time for years, until it got water damaged camping one time. No chance of doing that with digital radio (or Bluetooth headphones).

      FM > DAB

    • wuphysics87OP
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      They can pry the radio from my 15 year old car from my cold dead hands. I want analog controls not a touch screen! Tuning should be done with a knob. Nothing more.

      • darkdantedevil [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        I’d agree and broaden this to lots of controls. It’s nice to have physical inputs with tactile feedback. Especially in cars. I don’t want to use a fucking touchscreen to adjust the radio or the climate controls. And universally the touchscreens lag occasionally. Yeah. Don’t want that when adjusting volume or temp. Thanks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      My dad got and refurbished a vintage receiver and was showing it off to me. I asked if he was listening to a CD or a record because I’d never heard clearer audio. Nope, it was an FM station.

      Blew my mind.

  • mozz
    link
    fedilink
    1511 months ago

    Oh

    I for-real misread this, as asking what is an example of tech that actually has gotten better, because the general rule is that things become more shit over time, as capitalism gets its hands on them

    I was gonna say programming languages. Having come up in the time of C++ and Java, having Python and Go and Rust around is fuckin fantastic. Even Typescript is… well… it’s not JavaScript! See, things are getting better.

    Literally everything else is getting worse over time.

    • mesa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      Yeah developer tools have gotten easier and better. Never a better time to get into software. Even if its just to unlock your own devices. And repair things.

      • mozz
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Dude, it’s fuckin magic now

        I was used to emacs + gdb + valgrind. That’s actually pretty significantly powerful if you know how to use it, but I sort of bit the bullet really not that long ago and forced myself to learn VSCode, assuming that it would be a big over-feature-packed bunch of bullshit, and it’s gold. It can debug any language. I can edit and run and debug code that’s on the other side of an ssh connection in a git repo and all the different plugins and stuff just work (well, you know, for the most part, enough to be pretty massively useful).

        Plus I can have GPT spit out boilerplate for me and it does it all semi-instantly, and it can teach me libraries and idiomatic patterns in environments I’m unfamiliar with way faster than I could do it myself from the documentation.

        Fuckin magic man

        • mesa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Yep and with docker/other containers it’s easier to set up on new machines. Terraform and other like services also make provisioning potentially easier (depends on your setup).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1411 months ago

    I don’t know if it counts as tech per se, but phone calls. It used to be the case that many if not most phone calls people received were important, so they would have a good reason to answer the phone. These days most calls are spammers or scammers and a lot of people don’t answer the phone because of this. With spoofing, even calls that appear to be from a legitimate number can easily be a scam, and it’s hard to trust any calls these days.

  • The Bard in Green
    link
    fedilink
    43
    edit-2
    11 months ago
    • Facebook.
    • OKCupid.
    • Reddit
    • Netflix
    • Amazon Prime Video
    • iTunes
    • Twitter
    • Patreon
    • Everything Adobe
    • Google Voice
    • YouTube
    • Most search engines

    ALSO

    • MySQL
    • Redis

    ALSO

    • Wordpress

    ALSO

    • Vacuum cleaners
    • Refrigerators
    • Every power tool ever
    • Most cars
    • Airplanes (looking at you Boing)

    ALSO

    • Apple products

    ALSO

      • The Bard in Green
        link
        fedilink
        1111 months ago

        Sure, that was overly broad. But I’ve got a BUNCH of tools in my garage and they’re fine, but my dad’s got a bunch of the same tools in his workshop he had when I was a kid, and they still work just as well now as they did in the 80s (I think his drill press actually used to belong to HIS dad and it’s never failed me). Also, his table saw and band saw rock. I remember using them to cut things for silly projects when I was a kid and I just used the table saw the other day… same saw, great results.

        My take was all centered around “solid” and “built to last”. I don’t have any faith that the tools in my garage will outlast his tools. Don’t see it happening. I think me inheriting his tools is more likely than my tools outlasting them.

        • Domi
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          My dad has an old Makita cordless drill from 1995 which he used for everything from assembling Ikea furniture to drilling holes in cement walls. Complete metal innards, full metal case, battery that’s big and heavy enough to bludgeon somebody to death with.

          Until one day I bought a fancy new Bosch cordless screwdriver with Li-ion battery, brushless motor and 1/4 the size and weight of the Makita.

          At first he laughed at me for buying a toy, then he tried it. He ordered one as well the week after and uses it pretty much exclusively since then.

          Still keeps the Makita box and drill around purely for the retro look but even with fresh batteries the amount of torque they put out is not even in the same league.

          Obviously that is the exception rather than the rule and most technological advances went into making companies more profits instead of building better products, but there are some advancements that made power tools better. Li-ion batteries and brushless motors being two of the big ones.

            • Domi
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              And yet I do not think I will be using my Bosch in 25 years because some cheap internal plastic part will have broken down while the Makita would still run.

          • The Bard in Green
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You’re kind of an asshole for like completely no reason aren’t you? That’s now what this conversation is about. By all means, continue.

    • Turd Ferg
      link
      fedilink
      1711 months ago

      Pandora. I remember when it was a “music experiment”

      • FuzzyRedPanda
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Hey now, Pandora still pays 0.133 cents per play to the artists like they always have!

        Surprisingly, it’s more than Deezer pays (0.11 cents).

        So on a good month, 10 to 15 cents of my $5.00 subscription will go to the artists.

        …I think I just talked myself out of paying for this subscription any longer.

        • Turd Ferg
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Ive never paid for subscription on pandora. The ad version isnt that bad, but I also dont listen to it for more than an hour at a time. I would say on average I get 5 -15 second ads an hour.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      You really summed it up. So much good on that list gone poorly wrong. But hey, they made a few increments for the shareholders.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 months ago

    Yeah ok having both makes sense as it allows easier controls for the passenger to use or while being stopped

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    911 months ago

    Just don’t connect your TV to the internet and plug in a raspi. All the “smart” you could ever want without the bloat

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 months ago

      Is it possible to connect an Ethernet cable to my TV, but only have it connect the local network, not the Internet? I.e., just a LAN connection. I have very little desire to watch YouTube on my TV, but I do have a personal Emby server that is not connected to the wider net but is accessible locally.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        If your firewall can set outbound rules, and you can control DHCP on your network so that you can reliably know the TV’s IPv4 address, you can block the TV from reaching beyond the local network there with a “deny all from source address of TV” type rule.

        If your router/firewall is handling IPv6 though, it gets a lot more complicated, since the TV could have any number of addresses that change often.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          Okay, I checked, and as far as I can tell (which doesn’t mean much as I don’t know much about this stuff, mind you) it does seem like I can control outbound rules. However, I don’t know how to find out the IP address of the TV. Additionally, I don’t know if my router is IPv4 or IPv6 in this context, but according to the online spec sheet for my router model it supports both.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            There should be a section in the configuration about dhcp, which is how ipv4 addresses are given out on your network. What happens is when a device first connects to the network, it sends out a broadcast with its mac address - the dhcp server (in this case, your router/firewall) hears this, and sends back a reply allocating an address. You should be able to see a list of currently allocated addresses, and hopefully configure reservations to make those allocations permanent. To reserve an ipv4 address for a specific device, you need that device’s mac address.

            Each item on that current allocations list should have a hostname, a mac address, and an ipv4 address. If it’s not clear by the hostname which device is the tv, you can look up each mac address and deduce from there (the first part of each address is unique to a specific manufacturer).

            Once you have an ipv4 address reserved for the tv, you can set your outbound firewall rule to block it.

            Ipv6, as I mentioned, is much more complicated. It might be possible to disable it completely on your router, and that’s likely the only way to block the tv from using it, but then your whole network will lose ipv6 capability across that boundary (probably not a lot of downside to that, though).

            Good luck!

    • wuphysics87OP
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      That’s the thing though it isn’t. I don’t need my TV reporting back to the mother ship how often I slug on the couch

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Oh it’s fuckin nonsense. Which is why you run the pi and control what does and doesn’t phone home.

  • Dr. Wesker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    216
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The internet.

    The internet of the 90s was wild, creative, and not as accessible. We dreamed that as it grew and became more accessible, a utopia of information and creativity would flourish.

    Instead we got a bland, corporate wasteland, and free soapboxes for every shithead out there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      I disagree. There’s so much more creativity and information out there than there was in the 90’s.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1711 months ago

      All that chaos is still out there. Its just that its smaller and you have to not get stuck in the corporate bullshit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1311 months ago

        Finding it is almost impossible though. I’ve tried and tried but the search engines don’t show any of these cute little niche sites that are definitely out there.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          You know, you aren’t wrong.

          I’ve been noodling on an idea for a while:

          What about a… fediverse focused/ federated search engine?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1711 months ago

          Back then, you didn’t find them in search engines either. Your friends told you about them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            811 months ago

            I feel the bigger problem is that there just aren’t as many of them.

            Why host a webpage now when you can just set up a Facebook page for it?

            • Maeve
              link
              fedilink
              811 months ago

              I wish people would realize there are people from every generation who won’t touch Facebook, IG and other meta things. When we finally got s new mayor who actually said our town with soon have a real website, I nearly wept with joy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              “aren’t as many of them”

              I do not believe that. There is more of everything now than there was Internet before. The web used to be tiny.

              You are not going to find what you want by clicking on the “Mozilla Cool Site of the Day”. But they are out there.

              Not that I do not agree with the point the OP is making. The “cool site” story itself illustrates the overall story-arc of the Internet pretty well:

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cool_Site_of_the_Day

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5911 months ago

      Yup, most of the internet is now sadly an ad-infested monetized corporate hellhole, and as a bonus it’s now rapidly being filled to the brim with AI slop, because it clearly wasn’t bad enough just yet… :(