cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/37281970

Believe it or not, an unexpected conflict has arisen in the openSUSE community with its long-time supporter and namesake, the SUSE company.

At the heart of this tension lies a quiet request that has stirred not-so-quiet ripples across the open source landscape: SUSE has formally asked openSUSE to discontinue using its brand name.

Richard Brown, a key figure within the openSUSE project, shared insights into the discussions that have unfolded behind closed doors.

Despite SUSE’s request’s calm and respectful tone, the implications of not meeting it could be far-reaching, threatening the symbiotic relationship that has benefited both entities over the years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4011 months ago

      This is absurd

      Years ago, when there were talks about establishing an independent foundation, sane people already warned that relying on a trademark not owned by them is risky. That was batted away as a non-issue. Now here we are.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    4311 months ago

    wow. I had a good opinion of suse up to this point. what a silly request after all these years.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      From my own looking into this it looks like more of a suggestion than a request (for now at least), just a “this might be a good idea, we should look into it”.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        1011 months ago

        I just don’t get what they are thinking. opensuse is basically free advertising for them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          Yea, I only know suse from opensuse and of my company ever needs Linux support, I would go to suse because I know it from openSuse…

          And I would love to work for suse because I had such a good experience with openSuse

          I think a name change would be pretty dump…

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            this is how I feel. If I am involved in work decisions I will recommend the enterprise version because the support just makes sense and is incredibly cheap vs most software. It actually took me awhile to understand the whole fedora, centos, redhat connection.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s a strange suggestion after very recently working closely with openSUSE to ensure Leap can use the same binaries as SLE, though

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Strange is using and marketing someone else’s name without written permission.

      Why do you think linux distros and free software have such strange names? To avoid stepping on someone toes without expensive trademark research.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      When I hear openSUSE, I think of german engineering and resources from SUSE, with a history of innovating great infrastructure.
      With a new name, distanced from the SUSE part, I’ll probably feel more like if this is yet another random derivative created by a small group who might soon lose interest.

  • Hugh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    711 months ago

    If GeckOS doesn’t work out… SUSEbanthony, LazySUSE, SUSEsarandon, DrSUSE, uSUSEalsuspects, OkcanSUSE (must be sung)… #puns

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    Makes sense really.

    OpenSUSE is not the open version of SUSE ( SUSE Linux Enterprise - SLE ). If you compare to Red Hat, OpenSUSE is Fedora, not CentOS.

    I can see how people would get the wrong idea.

    It is a bit crappy that they waited so long though. On the desktop, OpenSUSE is quite an established brand.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3211 months ago

    This is a massive miss-play on Suse’s part. Essentially all the good will, and recognition I have for Suse is based on OpenSuse. It’s the reason many of the places I’ve worked at now run a Suse product instead of redhat. Seriously, when I think of OpenSuse and Suse as a whole I barely differentiate the toonunlike redhat and fedora. That’s likely the reason for the switch but I cannot see how-this does anything but benefit them.

    From the article too there are some concerns. Suse is, admittedly, trying to cause opensuse to change direction ans managment to further suit it’s buisness at threat of removing support. This is sad to see.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4011 months ago

    TIL SUSE exists and wouldn’t have found out if not for OpenSUSE and this news. It’s kinda weird to open their website and see this:

  • Brayd
    link
    fedilink
    2811 months ago

    The request was respectful and SUSEs support on OpenSUSE is very helping the project so I’d personally be fine with fulfilling that request

  • Handles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6411 months ago

    Just rename it jeSUSE, because nobody fucks with the jeSUSE.