I would like to hear if any of you are using different app for API testing than Postman.
I’m not telling that Postman is bad, but maybe there’s all that I should check out. Recently I tried RapidApi and even tho the app is kinda cool I missed few options and went back to Postman for now.
xh and tiny shell scripts.
Example: sign-up-forbidden-username.req
#!/bin/bash xh POST http://0.0.0.0:2884/sign-up usename=admin password=pw
to run
./sign-up-forbidden-username.req
This returns 403 and “Username is unavailable”
xh is a rust implementation of httpie. They’re going for full parity, and works really well for what I need it for so far You can also read input from a file. Which IMO makes GUI API testing seem silly.
Maybe try Swagger
Surprised how little love this option is getting in the comments. Not only will swagger be generated for you from your openapi spec, it has a clean fast UI and shared auth.
I’m using the vscode extension called Thunderclient
Same. I like this so I don’t need to open a second app. Only used PostMan and ThunderClient, so can’t comment on others.
This. Is the best GUI, via vs code extension
Hoppscotch is pretty cool
Insomnia user here too, I’ve found it to be simple,clean and to my taste.
Insomnia.kong
I just started using Insomnia and I really like it, highly recommended!
If you’re on a Mac, I recommend the RapidAPI native HTTP client. It used to be called Paw and it recently got acquired by the RapidAPI team but it hasn’t changed much and still works pretty well IMO. I’ve been using it for years to test out APIs and i like it better than Postman.
Another vote for Insomnia here. I used to use Insomnia primarily until a lot of my work switched over to gRPC and I’ve found that Postman works a lot better for that. I still prefer Insomnia for the simple UX and speed, just wish it had better gRPC support.
Yeah it’s called curl lol
No joke, I use curlie, .curlrc and a bunch of scripts
can you elaborate a bit on that ? I’ve only used curl from cli and never used .curlrc. and what’s curlie ?
Curlie is a wrapper on curl that makes more ergonomic to use. I set path to cookie jar in .curlrc. I sync cookies from the browser.
This is the way.
deleted by creator
I stopped using postman in favor of just writing Python scripts to test what I was testing. 🤷♂️
(I’m getting tired of learning new tools when I only end up needing some surface level functionality that I can quickly write myself. Maybe that’s just me.)
I use Hurl. Everything is just a text file:
POST https://example.org/api/tests { "id": "4568", "evaluate": true } HTTP 200 [Asserts] header "X-Frame-Options" == "SAMEORIGIN" jsonpath "$.status" == "RUNNING" # Check the status code jsonpath "$.tests" count == 25 # Check the number of items jsonpath "$.id" matches /\d{4}/ # Check the format of the id
is it based on the http file standard? https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/exploring-http-syntax.html
it seems like even jetbrains has a cli you can use https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/http-client-cli.html#environment-variables
It’s very similar to what JetBrains has and you can easily translate between the two (assuming you aren’t using assertions or any Hurl-specific features), but not exactly the same syntax.
I tend to go with Hurl because it’s self contained and you can do things like throw it in your CI builds.
I am alternating between Postman and https://hoppscotch.io, it’s open source (https://github.com/hoppscotch/hoppscotch) and has great feature set.
As it’s a web app, and a minor downside is that you have to have to install a browser extension (open-source as well) or use a proxy in order to aviod CORS issues.
I recommend Visual Studio Code and one of the following two extensions:
Either one isn’t really the full picture - you’ll ned to combine it with other extensions - such as a good JSON language extension (which will give you syntax highlighting, error checking, code folding/etc.
The most important extension is CoPilot. That’s the killer feature which makes Visual Studio Code vastly better than Postman.
Thunder is very similar to Postman. Not much to say other than it works well, it’s free, millions of people use it.
It’s not really my cup of tea, but I do think it’s better than Postman because you can use your own version control servers to collaborate with colleagues, which is generally better (and cheaper) than Postman’s collaboration service in my opinion (you get diffs, code review, pull requests, history, etc etc for all your most important API tests).
Personally I prefer REST Client (also free, and has even more users than Thunder).
REST Client is really simple. It adds a new “HTTP” text file type. You simply type a HTTP request into the file and hit a hotkey (or click a button) to execute the request. And it shows you the response. Easy.
HTTP requests and responses are just plain text, and you can simply save those as files in your project. REST Client also has basic support for variables, API credentials, etc. Not quite as user friendly as Postman or Thunder Client, but it makes up for that by being straightforward and flexible.
CoPilot Chat, works with both, but having everything in plain text gives it more control over REST Client than Thunder Clinet you can write (and edit) your requests with a series of simple plain english prompts. E.g. “JSON request with a blog post body” will give you:
POST https://example.com/blog/posts Content-Type: application/json { "title": "My First Blog Post", "body": "This is the content of my first blog post. It's not very long, but it's a start!", "author": "John Doe", "tags": ["blogging", "first post"] }
You might follow that up with “Add a UUID” or “Add a JWT auth header”.
Copilot can answer questions too - e.g. “How do I unsubscribe a user with the Mailchimp API?” They use the “HTTP PATCH” request type - WTF.