Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • David GerardOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    https://bsky.app/profile/jonpennington.bsky.social/post/3kxqkmezcwe2o

    I went to college with him. Yarvin is curdled nerd rage personified. He also lies about his age. He’s older than me & claims a birth date that would make him younger than me.

    I was on a Quiz Bowl team with him & whenever he would buzz in for an answer, he would jerk his body spasmodically, which the other people on the team called “Yarvinating.”

    He’s the kind of player that other Quiz Bowl players hate, known in the subculture as a “pickoff lord.” That is to say, he’s the kind of guy who would pad his stats by diving in to buzz on easy questions, make wild guesses on intros so he could get more points than teammates, etc.

    Hand to God. If anybody disputes me, I’ve got at least one other person who would remember the “Yarvinating” anecdote. I’ve got legit Quiz Bowl cred. I used to play against Ken Jennings before he was even a Jeopardy! contestant, let alone host.

    I connected on Facebook with a former classmate, somebody else from that team who once appeared in a College Jeopardy! tournament. We’re both kind of just gobsmacked that we were there for somebody else’s Lex Luthor origin story.

    Another bit of tea… He lies about his age. He was an upperclassman at Brown when I was a freshman & he claims to be younger than me.

    see also https://www.qbwiki.com/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

    Yarvin played on the College Bowl-only team for Brown from 1989 to 1992. In 2021 he published a poem[2] stating that “No one can fucking touch me / In College Bowl.” Brown failed to advance out of the Region 1 tournament for all four years of Yarvin’s participation, making his lifetime record at intercollegiate tournaments 0-4 and demonstrating that, at a minimum, the Brandeis, MIT, and Williams teams were capable of “touching” his performance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I’d never looked into how old the clown is, but

      He also lies about his age. He’s older than me & claims a birth date that would make him younger than me.

      wait what? what does he claim? is the indicated year on wikipedia accurate? why the hell?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      He also lies about his age.

      I also knew somebody who did that, but it was done as a joke, he obv picked an age much much younger and everybody new he was older, it was just a funny joke. (With a small layer of disliking getting older, which is understandable) From the way this is written, it seems to me this isn’t like that at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        I like answering ludicrously old whenever this stupid shit comes up

        or picking timestamps that make devs wonder whether they had a value handling bug (such as 1/1/1970, the asp.net default 0, etc ec)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Just be careful you never pick very young. iirc Twitter permbans you if you ever pick a date which means you were under 13 when you registered.

  • Steve
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Jeremy Keith on the bullshit “privacy sandbox” in chrome and firefox: https://adactio.com/journal/21285

    I like Jeremy because he is an OG, but I think his requirement for proof that targeted advertising “works” before the browsers implement these features is off the mark for me. He’s an agency guy, a bit like Andy Budd, so they tend to have these really visceral takes about the state of the web but with this skewed perspective of best interests

      • Steve
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        We developed the Privacy Sandbox with the goal of finding innovative solutions that meaningfully improve online privacy while preserving an ad-supported internet that supports a vibrant ecosystem of publishers, connects businesses with customers, and offers all of us free access to a wide range of content.

        god, the opening paragraph made my head spin with tech pr copy

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          could you imagine what web development would be like in a world where browser standards, features, and sandboxes weren’t firmly in the grips of these marketing chucklefucks?

          like, I’ve mentioned to coworkers “hey isn’t the browser sandbox kind of bullshit? there’s so many parts of it that don’t do anything for security, but they make things harder for developers and easier for advertisers” and I don’t think a single one knew what I was talking about, because web development as a field has been captured by ad agencies. shit, find me one web development reference that isn’t owned by an ad agency.

          and now they’re secure enough in that control that they do this fully mask-off shit, confident they’ll get away with it, cause who’s gonna stop them? bets on Mozilla reversing course on blocking third-party cookies now that google’s gone in this direction

          • Brian David
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            @self @fasterandworse

            “And now they’re secure enough in that control that they do this fully mask-off shit …”

            That whole DRM-the-web attestation thing Google proposed last year was eye opening. Sure, they had been evil for a while, but the fact that they knew they could start proposing stuff like that at all is just so bleak. In a sane world, that behaviour would instantly result in serious antitrust lawsuits.

    • Sailor Sega Saturn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      There was no technical reason why we couldn’t have web fonts. The reason why we didn’t get web fonts for years and years was because browser makers were concerned about piracy and type foundries.

      I was a bit surprised when I learned fonts are CORSd at least party as a sort of primitive DRM so that font companies would buy into the webfont spec (that’s how I remember it anyway, it’s been awhile since I dug up the relevant mailing list messages)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      How do people do this without dying of anxiety?

      BTW, that last comment on RetractionWatch was grim:

      I recently saw a presentation by a job candidate (a PhD with many years experience) who used figures that were clearly AI-generated. They weren’t as funny as this example or the giant rat penis, but certainly fictional and unreal. In and of itself, troubling enough. Worse was that my colleagues involved in the interview didn’t care when I pointed it out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        it’s easier if you are a shameless fraud without a shred of integrity

        This is also probably why MBAs like it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      ai use case: you can pump out pseudoscience promoting fluff disguised as papers in predatory journals with less effort

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Okay but this is about alkaline water so it’s garbage even without the genAI imagery.

      It’s even by Wu et al., come on, low hanging fruit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just found out from a screenshot in a tweet that Marc Aandreesen considers Nick Land to be some kind of patron saint of “techno-optimism”. Setting aside Land’s ugly views about everything… I didn’t think optimism was what he was known for. More like grasping, desperate, disgusted embrace of the onward march of capital.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Nick Land (…) “techno-optimism”

      His thing is literally called DARK ENLIGHTENMENT, fucking Final Fantasy villain level of grandiose menacing naming, how on earth would that be “optimism”.

      Marcee do you even like know who your idols are?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I’m pretty sure that if the community “takes out the trash” (i.e. downvotes to dead status[1]) the mods won’t bother to ban the user.


      [1] I happen to believe thta this is not sufficient to get rid of bad actors

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Butters and Trump are ruining my ability to get anything done in town today. Not a big fan of this dumb shit inconveniencing me IRL.

    • Sailor Sega Saturn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here’s a tweet of Winklevoss feeling snubbed by VP Harris (twitter.com)

      The Biden-Harris Administration wages all-out war on the crypto industry for 4 years. Despite all of this, Kamala is still invited to the @TheBitcoinConf in Nashville and given a chance to speak to our industry and reset the relationship. What does she do? She declines. She can’t even take the first step and show up to start mending fences. Our industry won’t forget this. We will show no mercy in November.

      and another much longer one.

      My hope is that in the not-too-distant future there are no politicians at any Bitcoin or crypto conferences. Not because they are not welcome, but because crypto is so universally accepted that it is no longer a campaign issue and therefore would be a waste of their time. Like going to a conference on whether or not email or the Internet should be legal or allowed.

      Ooh, Like the internet! I got Bingo!

      Bitcoin bros: more of this self-aggrandizing rage please. It’s so entertaining to read.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Ooh, Like the internet!

        Considering the history of legislation and the internet (and the recent KOSA thing) being treated like the internet is the last thing you would want.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        They targeted gamers.

        Gamers.

        We’re a group of people who will sit for hours, days, even weeks on end performing some of the hardest, most mentally demanding tasks. Over, and over, and over all for nothing more than a little digital token saying we did.

        We’ll punish our selfs doing things others would consider torture, because we think it’s fun.

        We’ll spend most if not all of our free time min maxing the stats of a fictional character all to draw out a single extra point of damage per second.

        Many of us have made careers out of doing just these things: slogging through the grind, all day, the same quests over and over, hundreds of times to the point where we know evety little detail such that some have attained such gamer nirvana that they can literally play these games blindfolded.

        Do these people have any idea how many controllers have been smashed, systems over heated, disks and carts destroyed 8n frustration? All to latter be referred to as bragging rights?

        These people honestly think this is a battle they can win? They take our media? We’re already building a new one without them. They take our devs? Gamers aren’t shy about throwing their money else where, or even making the games our selves. They think calling us racist, mysoginistic, rape apologists is going to change us? We’ve been called worse things by prepubescent 10 year olds with a shitty head set. They picked a fight against a group that’s already grown desensitized to their strategies and methods. Who enjoy the battle of attrition they’ve threatened us with. Who take it as a challange when they tell us we no longer matter. Our obsession with proving we can after being told we can’t is so deeply ingrained from years of dealing with big brothers/sisters and friends laughing at how pathetic we used to be that proving you people wrong has become a very real need; a honed reflex.

        Gamers are competative, hard core, by nature. We love a challange. The worst thing you did in all of this was to challange us. You’re not special, you’re not original, you’re not the first; this is just another boss fight.

        • Sailor Sega Saturn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          None of you seem to understand. I’m not locked in here with you. You’re locked in here with multiple slurp juices on a single ape!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Regarding that claimed breakthrough about AI winning the International Mathematical Olympiad: a reminder that a proof which hangs together logically is not necessarily a proof that makes sense.

    Those formalized proofs are so incredibly ugly, it’s amazing. Of course it doesn’t much of a sensible indentation, but then there are single proof steps where I have no idea what it’s even doing. […] And then there are nonsense mathematical steps. The solution of problem 2 starts with induction, before introducing any variables. It applies induction to the number 12. And it write 12 as (10)+2. Then it proceeds to do the whole proof in the base case of the induction, and notices that the induction step is trivial, since the goal is the same as the induction hypothesis (but instead of the assumption tactic it uses congr 26).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        Spending an unknown but potentially long amount of time to maybe get a solution of potentially minimal legibility is definitely AI’s killer app.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          movie announcer voice aaaaaand now, from the org structures that brought you Teams Doing Standup Poker, an announcement!

          heeeeeeere’s Promptfondling!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            the org structures that brought you Teams Doing Standup Poker

            which must be destroyed. find me who’s responsible for this (it’s the Google OKR people, isn’t it?)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              listen buddy if you’re not arguing about the definition of done for design phase and overspending your meeting windows by 2 hours because of points quibbling, are you even SAFe

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Also, choice sneer in the comments:

      AlphaProof is more “AlphaZero doing self play against Lean” and less “Gemeni reading human proofs”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Libertarian nerds run straight into actual California, not the AI-generated dreamland they imagine

    Mercury news: “Billionaires’ utopia company California Forever scraps plan for ballot initiative in wake of damning report”

    https://archive.ph/UbdBw

    The report released late last week by Solano County said the proposed new city of 50,000 — possibly up to 400,000 decades from now — would likely cost the county billions of dollars and create substantial annual financial deficits, while slashing agricultural production, damaging climate-change resilience, and potentially threatening local water supplies. The project, according to the report, “may not be financially feasible.”

    HN shows what they think of the 3 people with actual thoughts on the issue by downvoting them to death

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41047746

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Who could have predicted this except for everybody ! There’s a reason none of these galt gulches ever get built.

    • David GerardOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      which spent more than $800 million buying more than 60,000 acres of mostly agricultural land near Fairfield

      Marc Andreessen and Reid Hoffman, just in case anyone thought there was a difference