Back in the day the best way to find cool sites when you were on a cool site was to click next in the webring. In this age of ailing search engines and confidently incorrect AI, it is time for the webring to make a comeback.

This person has given his the code to get started: Webring

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    I can’t believe anyone did this. It’s totally random (within pool of participants). There’s a reason it went away. Is the equivalent of “I’m feeling lucky” but with a smaller pool. I guess I’d you like random it’s fine I guess?

    • Dave.
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Webrings were themed though, so if your interest was cars, or cats, or ham radio, you could get on a webring for one of those topics and cycle through them.

      And it wasn’t all random, you could move left or right on the ring , or jump randomly. So a good webring manager could group sites together as you went around the ring as well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      You didn’t have a good experience with it, many of us did have some food experiences with it.

      But it made going out on the Internet interesting. Today I’m not sure if its less or more risky to view a sketchy site, is it more risky now with ransom ware, data scraypers, and such.

      Ide consider viruses to be less of a risk today, but my results probably vary

      My experience was that those webrings often worth checking out if you didnt have something specific you were looking for today.

      Its not the same at all, but theres a sense of my experience when i suddenly realize im on wikipedia and have opened 50+ tabs after I’ve finished what i was reading. Then just going through the tabs you have open

  • Last
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    This is a great idea. I didn’t see a Linux subway yet, but the process for requesting new lines seems pretty simple.

  • Pope Bob
    link
    fedilink
    421 year ago

    @mrpalmer16 one of my favorite things back in the day was the old-school “StumbleUpon” which was like webrings on crack.

    Unfortunately, advertising and profit-seeking happened.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Stumbleupon was great. I remember having a browser plug in for it. Then I stopped using it for a little while and never went back to it.

      Does it still exist?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          FTA

          eBay announced that it had agreed to acquire StumbleUpon for a whopping $75 million. The acquisition ultimately went through on May 30th, 2007. One of the major reasons why the team decided to sell to eBay was that it was promised complete autonomy and independence from its mother company

          …sad trombone

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          my go to was Fark. I know it still exits and maybe I’ll start using it again but man that site was great.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Ah man, those times were great. Bored? Just push the button and you’ll see something new. No scrolling, just a new website with random interesting stuff to explore.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        That sounds amazing, I somehow missed it. Some of the other sites posted abovr seem to be trying to bring back the magic.

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      It will happen out of necessity once LLMs make search engines useless. Bookmarks and human-curated content will be the only way to find stuff.

      It’s already affecting small businesses worldwide, who aren’t being discovered anymore by searches in their local area.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      So would people having webpages instead of social media accounts

      And there’s your problem… (in the voice of Jamie Hyneman, Mythbusters). To see a real return of webrings, people would need to have (make) their own pages and curate some links.

      Thinking about it, with the rise of selfhosted, it’s actually really viable, cobble together a docker stack with a WYSIWYG HTML editor somewhat oriented to the task (pretty sure something out there can be repurposed), a web server, proxy, and that’s about it (probably missing a fair bit, not my bailiwick, still, once the stack is made and solid, I’m guessing many would host, I would). Set a threshold of how many people you’re willing to host, say 50 or whatever so you’re able to check for CSAM or other legal minefields, and Bob’s your uncle, stir in some solid security to keep it isolated if you’re using it at home (or VPS) and it’s golden.

      OK, more complicated than I initially thought, and it’s way less friction to use something like faceplant, which is entirely their point. Still, I think, if given the opportunity, and functional tools, and low enough friction, many would prefer to have a hand curated presence on the web above a facebook page.

      I’ll stop, but thanks for the interesting thought seed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        There has to be a cultural shift as well. It’s not the early 2000s anymore where a substantial portion of internet users could tinker around their desktop computers. I recently got fiber at home and we’re locked behind CGNAT. I could look for a solution for myself since I grew up opening ports on my router, but imagine someone who grew up with bubble-wrapped smartphones trying to navigate their way through that bs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I also just got fiber from AT&T. I’m pretty grateful that their gateway/router can just offload all traffic to my own router and a t as just a dumb gateway. Right now I use duckdns to just public host a subsonic server for when I’m in the car or out and about but it’s been very pain free.

          I read up a little on cgnat but can you tell me what issues you face? I’m curious.

          Never mind… read up on it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT

          I guess the alternative would be routing everything through a static ip providing vpn

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Website hosting is still a thing. Not everything needs to be self hosted.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          You’re not wrong, but here we are, talking open source and GPL licences. If you can make a game portal work, or the web in general, it’s viable, your ISP is a choke point though, agreed. Was more talking about an easy stack like the 'arrs, but for webrings, just an idea…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            At least now we have options like Pikapods where you can just throw a containerized server up cheap. Even people who might be overwhelmed by a VM can do that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Yeah! StumbleUpon was cool. Something about how it tried to engender serendipity.

      Such a pity that so many other good recommendation engines died or succumbed to enshittification.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Yeah I remember very clearly — they introduced advertising and the whole thing went immediately to shit 🤷

  • maegul (he/they)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    The idea comes up again and again on the fediverse. It feels ripe for some app/platform to kinda nail it.

    I’m not sure this is it or even something that does exactly the old web ring thing. I think a simple enough system for the human curation of web pages in a standardised way that can easily be consumed and aggregated would go a long way though. The fediverse feels like its close to something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Man, their website is pretty off-putting. Where’s the get-started/dive-in type page? How do I use the thing?

      • maegul (he/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        I’m aware of it (and while not being super enthused about it, I can my personal interest growing over time as the internet keeps tracking the way it is).

        But how does it help with a page recommendation system? Is there a strong culture of that sort of thing on Gemini?

        • china🇨🇳
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          in gemini you typically find pages using Antenna (gemini://warmedal.se/~antenna/) here you would find different blog all across gemini. also you could go to bbs(gemini://bbs.geminispace.org/) to discuss stuff of variety of range.

      • calm.like.a.bomb
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Oh, man!! This looks so much like one of my old blogs!!! The layout, the colors! Brings back great memories.

      • maegul (he/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        That seems interesting!

        In the end, I’m wondering if all the pieces are here on something like the fediverse but just need to be connected. I haven’t thought about this at all until now (so I’m just riffing here) … but the essence of such a system seems to me:

        1. Recommendations are human curated
        2. Recommendations come from a single human (or well defined collective)
        3. Reccommendations are organised in a navigable structure

        Point 3 seems to be the unclear part. A “ring” is obviously a bunch of connections (not unlike a linked list). But other structures probably have a lot to provide here, especially if they’re amenable to some basic search facility.

        • Handles
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          other structures probably have a lot to provide here, especially if they’re amenable to some basic search facility

          I got real excited about the webring returning. This… not so much. Keep it simple.

          • maegul (he/they)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I mean, the search doesn’t have to be centralised at all … basic search facilities could include the text search in the browser for any page, but made more user friendly and just for the webring you’re navigating or something.

            • Handles
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              So, classic webring navigation consists of arrows to the next and previous ring instances, as well as a link to the ring index. By their nature, webrings are manageable-sized communities by nature. I don’t see how that can be improved upon by a search function?

              • maegul (he/they)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                well the central site of the web ring could be searched for any particular page that’s part of the ring, and that search could be surfaced on any page that’s part of the ring.

                The full set of pages could be decentralised and cached across all members for robustness, and even include each page’s own description and recommendations for every other page if they like.

                And then, of course … rings of webrings with as many levels of aggregation as people are interested in maintaining, again with decentralised caches of pages, their links and descriptions (all human curated of course) that can all be searched whenever a member page or aggregating page opts into it.

                Tech capabilities have advanced since the 90s enough now that basic text search in a web page over a small data set is not hard or too much to ask.

                And nested rings of rings of rings are scalable because at each level the data will just be links (and descriptions or names if available) while it would be on the user to navigate the various layers however they wish until they find something they’re interested in.

        • Dr. Wesker
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          You might be overthinking it, or I might be underthinking it.

          When I hear “webring” I think of a simple list of sites, curated by the ring creator. And all members have a badge on their site, complete with a few nav buttons.

          It was never broke, why fix it?

          • maegul (he/they)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            It was never broke, why fix it?

            Totally fair! I don’t claim to know what I’m talking about! I’m just riffing on what I suspect would work for me, but also motivated by what I feel is a relatively urgent need to create some robust and diverse human curation of the internet. So in a way I’m not really interested in remaking web rings, but more coming from the perspective of what else can be done with the same general idea along side webrings.